334 replies to this topic

[Lyner]

Simplest explanation best explanation

 

 

Vote: Kitkat

[Kitkat16]

Simplest explanation best explanation

 

 

Vote: Kitkat

 

Rhizo himself retracted his vote and said that he found it unlikely I was scum.

[Lyner]

Then who is our suspect?

[Kitkat16]

Then who is our suspect?

 

I have an assignment due tomorrow, and don't have time for a proper reply at the moment. But my answer is: not me! Lynching someone whom Rhizo himself said was probably not scum simply because you don't have any better ideas is an absolute waste of time. I can assure you that all you will end up doing is killing off another VT, while also allowing the mafia another night kill.

[SeaBeeGipson]

I think it's worth noting that Rhizo may have been killed to destroy all leads. Essentially everyone was on those two wagons, and were back to where we were yesterday with just the knowledge that they both were town and Isocialism was scum. I'll have to look over the chat but I think checking into Isocialisms posts may be another route to take. Scum could've killed anyone to frame someone as well. Tomorrow I should be around my work computer and it'll be easier to read over the chats from yesterday

[The Warrior]

Read isoc's thoughts on all players in the game. I highlighted his thoughts about KitKat above in my last post. I think it's worth looking at further.

[Kitkat16]

I don't have time irl to defend myself properly right now. But if you want to lynch me, go right ahead. It won't do any good. I'm VT, the mafia will kill someone again overnight, and you'll find yourself no better off than you are now in the morning. Believe me or don't. I just have other things (as in, a LOT of other things) on my mind right now. (I'm barely able to juggle everything irl, let alone this.) It doesn't really matter if you lynch me because it's just one more townie dead.. if this were likely to influence the outcome of the game more, I'd be more inclined to try and find the time to defend myself, but I really don't have /any/ time.

[Lord MK]

Vote Count

Kitkat16 (2): The Warrior, Lyner
SeaBeeGipson (0):
Rafay (0):
King Cankles (0):
Lyner (0)
The Warrior (0):

No Lynch (0):

Not Voting: Rafay, SeaBeeGipson, King Cankles, Kitkat16

With 6 alive it takes 4 to lynch or 3 at deadline.
Deadline is Thursday, September 21 at 5:30 pm GMT

Vote Count

Kitkat16: 4
The Warrior: 2
Lyner: 2
Rafay: 1
SeaBeeGipson: 1
King Cankles: 1

[Lyner]

Nobody jumping in or voting someone else?

[The Warrior]

Does anyone else have any thoughts? Deadline is in two days..

[SeaBeeGipson]

Deadline seems to be fast approaching with almost everyone below the 4 post limit. I can't tell whether Isocialism was mentioning Kit Kat to defend him or frame him with his posts regarding him. It's a grey area when dealing with decoding scum posts.

If Kit Kat is scum, that's 3 dead and we win.
If he isn't, and no one is voting anyone else; we're going to be in a pretty information empty spot tomorrow.

With that being said, I imagine scum would try staying quiet and out of sight if KitKat isn't the scum. I don't see a sole surviving scum trying to draw any attention to themselves.

With that being said. I think this is the best course of action.

Vote KitKat

FOS KC and Rafay

[Kitkat16]

OK so let's set aside the fact that Rhizo said I was unlikely to be scum, and go off his reasoning, which was sound. Who the *heck* would draw attention to themselves so spectacularly by having a feud with Rhizo when, if I were a scum, I could sit back and make mundane posts and stay out of the spotlight? I wasn't in any great danger of being lynched at the time.

 

Neither is it as if my reasoning were poor. As Kevin (who is now dead) acknowledged, voting for Rhizo was the best choice at the time for a townie given his last minute voting change. It now transpires that he was a townie but I stand by my statement that he was the best choice available. Kevin agreed, and he was an unbiased townie without any agenda. I had nothing better to go on. Given that I was making the best vote I could in the circumstances, I think you should reconsider lynching me.

Incidentally, there's something I wish I could say here, but can't for strategic reasons because it might interfere with scum's strategy. But that in itself (the fact that it might affect scum gameplay) is a hint about what I'm referring to. I hope I'm not being too blatant, hopefully it'll be slightly more clear in retrospect. When I flip town tonight, bear it in mind.

[Lord MK]

Rafay and King Cankles has been pinged to check in. Hopefully, they check in soon.


Vote Count

Kitkat16 (3): The Warrior, Lyner, SeaBeeGipson
SeaBeeGipson (0):
Rafay (0):
King Cankles (0):
Lyner (0)
The Warrior (0):

No Lynch (0):

Not Voting: Rafay, King Cankles, Kitkat16

With 6 alive it takes 4 to lynch or 3 at deadline.
Deadline is Thursday, September 21 at 5:30 pm GMT

Vote Count

Kitkat16: 5
The Warrior: 3
Lyner: 3
SeaBeeGipson: 2
Rafay: 1
King Cankles: 1

[SeaBeeGipson]

OK so let's set aside the fact that Rhizo said I was unlikely to be scum, and go off his reasoning, which was sound. Who the *heck* would draw attention to themselves so spectacularly by having a feud with Rhizo when, if I were a scum, I could sit back and make mundane posts and stay out of the spotlight? I wasn't in any great danger of being lynched at the time.

 

Neither is it as if my reasoning were poor. As Kevin (who is now dead) acknowledged, voting for Rhizo was the best choice at the time for a townie given his last minute voting change. It now transpires that he was a townie but I stand by my statement that he was the best choice available. Kevin agreed, and he was an unbiased townie without any agenda. I had nothing better to go on. Given that I was making the best vote I could in the circumstances, I think you should reconsider lynching me.

Incidentally, there's something I wish I could say here, but can't for strategic reasons because it might interfere with scum's strategy. But that in itself (the fact that it might affect scum gameplay) is a hint about what I'm referring to. I hope I'm not being too blatant, hopefully it'll be slightly more clear in retrospect. When I flip town tonight, bear it in mind.

My attention isn't with anything Rhizo did. Beyond that, both wagons yesterday were townies. SO, essentially almost everyone was on a townie wagon. My concerns is more how Isocialism interacted with you in TW's copied quote. Small thing to go off of, but I don't see anything better we have ATM. Except for KC and Rafay's inactivity, but hopefully with the ping, they can answer to why they are so silent.

 

Please keep in mind KitKat is at L-1 before adding any other votes before KC and Rafay can talk.

[King Cankles]

Sorry guys, I'm here.

I'm sticking with my suspicion of KitKat atm.

You keep saying that Rhizo said he wasn't suspicious of you, but it's not like Rhiz knew everyone's role unless he was a Mason.

TW SBG and Lyner are all on your wagon. With 1 scum left I think we can learn from your lynch and who targeted you, even if you are town.

I'd like to politely ask that nobody end the day, It would be a waste of a good game.

[Rafay]

Vote: KitKat

[SeaBeeGipson]

Vote: KitKat

Well, there goes today..

[King Cankles]

So if the day ends via vote, do people still get mod killed? If so then its game over.

[Kitkat16]

OK, I'm dead then. As you will find out soon enough, I was VT, which frankly anyone with half a brain should have known. FoS Rafay for ending the day early.

[SeaBeeGipson]

Being that yesterday also ended with a vote and a mod kill was still done, I assume another mod kill will happen. Well, we asked today didn't end early. Let's cross our fingers and hope for the best