Seems more like congress needs to step in and actually legislate, pendulum court rulings happen when they got nothing directly to go from.
Also don't make the "it's out there anyway, let it be free" argument, thats just stupid.
Seems more like congress needs to step in and actually legislate, pendulum court rulings happen when they got nothing directly to go from.
Also don't make the "it's out there anyway, let it be free" argument, thats just stupid.
Emperor of the Benelux
Founder of the Commonwealth of Planets
Founder and CEO of JF
Seems more like congress needs to step in and actually legislate, pendulum court rulings happen when they got nothing directly to go from.
Also don't make the "it's out there anyway, let it be free" argument, thats just stupid.
Things don't work the same here. Agreed that "Congress needs to step in and actually legislate", but they cannot pass any legislation that will infringe on the Constitutional right to bear arms, or the Constitutional right to freedom of speech. Anything they do that hits in those areas with be shot down by the Supremes, and the DOJ knows this... that's why they killed the prohibition to begin with.
The states need to revisit their own laws, enforce education on firearms, and crack down with severe punishment when firearms are used to commit crimes. That's Constitutional. This would create an open and knowing environment in all states that the proper use of firearms is fine... but if you use them the wrong way, the results will end with the most uncomfortable existence in a very short life.
Woke (adj.)
A state of awareness only achieved by those dumb enough
to find injustice in everything except their own behavior.
Still would require Congress to "broaden" the rules and regulations to also include these weapons then. I would work them into the present legal framework, something that still needs to be done no?
Emperor of the Benelux
Founder of the Commonwealth of Planets
Founder and CEO of JF
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users