I was checking for a possible inconsistency, but it seems to check out.
But does it really? Let me elaborate on this.
Let's all assume The Warrior is telling the truth in these scenarios and I'm scum for sake of argument and compare it with what we know.
Scenario 1: I'm Scum, Velocity is my scum partner (This is more for Rafay, and CM. Velocity I know is town at this point.)
In this scenario, it implied that not only Velocity, but myself both voted for MK during D3. Not only that, it implies that MK and Velocity started lynch wagons on each other, and when Velocity's picked up, I (the other scum), tried to draw attention to MK by joining his wagon. Basically, this implies the scum were all trying to kill each other and they didn't even bother to look for another target. In fact, at the time I voted the wagons were as follows:
Velocity: KevinH, Lord MK, Col Med
Lord Mk: Velocity, SBG
Robert: Rafay
If I was scum, why did I 1) Not join Robert's town wagon? 2) wait to see if another wagon formed, or 3) try to start another wagon. Instead this idea implies I placed the other scum in 2nd place, while Velocity (scum in this scenario) in first and doing nothing to draw attention away from the scum team. If I was trying to earn brownie points as a scum lynching a fellow scum, wouldn't it make more sense to kill Velocity who had the easier wagon?
Scenario 2: I'm Scum and Col Med is my scum partner. (This is more for Rafay and Velocity)
This implies that D4 started with KevinH setting a FoS on Velocity. Not only in this scenario are both of them town, but I would have nothing to gain by defending them. In this scenario, it implies I jumped out of the gate to defend Velocity, fake claim (without knowing what other roles were out there), and targetted KevinH. Instead of letting them form wagons on each other. What do I have to gain here except making myself a target? Why would I put myself in the spotlight when I could've let Velocity and Kevin put the spotlight on each other. I don't even think I have to explain how this scenario makes no sense.
Scenario 3: I'm the only scum left/I'm the SK
This would be a horrible mistake on my part to fake claim this early. What would I have to gain? In this scenario, I fake claim to get Kevin lynched? and then what. When he appears town, I'd be dead tomorrow. As the only scum, I wouldn't hold a majority to win. Even with Kevin dead, and a night kill completed. I'd hope you guys wouldn't think so low of me to make this mistake.
Those all seems like some pretty big inconsistencies with me being scum in my opinion.
Scenario 4
The only, real scenario is that I'm telling the truth and Kevin and The Warrior are the two remaining scum. When I discovered Kevin as scum, Warrior fake claimed to counter my claim and cast doubt to defend his scum buddy. In this scenario, TW lies to save Kevin and get me lynched. They then night kill a town and win by majority. At this point, only Velocity/CM (whom ever they dont kill) and Rafay would remain versus TW and Kevin.
His claim is no more/less concrete than mine. His claim includes 1) a dead, already confirmed townie, 2) his scum partner, and 3) his target
My, however, if it was a fake claim, help a risk. If anyone had a power role (that I didn't know about) and investigated or visited MK on N2, and I got no results, it would've flawed my claim. Why would I risk that in a situation that, again, I had nothing to gain?
As far as a ninja theory, that would involve 1) if there are two scums, we'd have a JOAT and a Ninja, and Rhizo's goon cop role would be useless or 2) We have 3 scum, 1 JOAT, 1 Ninja, and 1 goon. If this theory applies, then please see above. In which scenario and whom is my scum partner if a ninja exists?