Falzis

Did you vote for yourself? Plus, you're saying you had suspicions since D1. Could you kindly repeat them and the basis of those "suspicions"?

1. It's all WIFOM. He could be scum. He could be town. We could either lynch somebody else, we could lynch him. Then we find out the alignment. But AoD is more likely scum for me right now unless Narsis tells me how to properly compute majorities and half-majorities. It's premature, it's a bait for the real doc to counter claim. That's how I see it. I could be wrong, but you could be wrong too. 2. AoD claimed he can protect himself. What do you think of that?

Seems like CD is right. I thought there were 12 people still alive but now I noticed that 5 and 7 were taken out so we are only 10 actually. But that would still mean 6 is the majority of 10 (unless Narsis points otherwise, majority is always half+1) and that 4 is half-majority of 10 (6 divided by 2 + 1).

an OMGUS?? lol you said that you can protect yourself. that will make me rethink my vote but that could just be you bluffing (it's still not sure even that you are the doc, much less a doc that can protect one's self).

Sorry I'm going with AoD on this one. It seems like an attempt to lure out a counter PR claim from the real doc. His role claim was premature to say the least.

The VC before AoD hinted at a power role. 3 votes. Too early.

Unvote I also don't believe AoD's role claim. He didn't have a half-majority vote before deadline lynch. He had 3 votes. That's not a half majority (it's 4 out of 7, 7 out of 12 is the majority lynch). Plus, if he is the doc, it's incredulous to role claim since he will surely be NKed since who would protect him. Unless he can protect himself, which I doubt, right? Vote: Angel of Doom

Unvote Vote: Electric Mango If AoD is pro town, we should save him. But on one condition. That next day, he should reveal what power role he has or what information he has that will help the town (if cop or whatnot and who he investigated). If he doesn't, we lynch him. I switched to EM because next to AoD he is now the most suspicious given SJ's reasons. If EM turns up town, we go for AoD.

i also voted for you because of the timing of your vote.

Bye guys. 3 days gone. If there's net in the province, I could check here. If not, I'm still not unvoting because I haven't heard a good defense from AoD. (I'm still here in an hour or two, I know you're there AoD so if you want me to unvote, make a good case for yourself or against somebody else).

Plus the main reason I was withholding my vote is because I was still waiting for KevinH to role claim to be able to weight the costs-benefits and maybe get more information to use for discussion in the following days.

How is this an FOS of everyone? It's only an FOS of EM for misrepping me. As for commitment, KevinH looked scummy but I had doubts. That's why I couldn't commit because even though he looked scummy I felt he was town.

I shall be away for the weekend and a day probably, I have a tournament to attend to.

I will be away on 5-8 so I can only change my vote until the 4th. Give me new perspectives guys!! Share your suspicions junk. It's not good to keep things to yourself.

I already cleared him in my D2 posts. Please review what I have said. The "Oh so Few" VC Kaziocore - 1 (angel of doom) angel of doom - 2 (CanucksDynasty, Falzis) Not voting - 8 (Falzis, Theophilos, molestargazer, Electric Mango, junkahoolik, Sir Jesus, Kaziocore, Carl Vincent

Plus mole got lucky anyway. Had KevinH not cracked re his power role I would assume there would have been less discontent with KevinH's inconsistency and scattered posts.

I still think mole is townie just because it would be too obvious for scum to push for a lynch and like previous games, it's usually those who lead the charge in lynching someone that are townie (like I did in previous game/s).

I've seen people reading this thread and not commenting. Why so (un)serious? Give your inputs guys.

That wasn't one of my reasons. I said your vote made it unlikely for others to unvote and save KevinH's neck.

Vote: angel of doom For voting KevinH with the disproven scenario of a "Weak Doc", voting 5th making it less likely for any unvote to save KevinH (this vote of mine is also applicable to Carl Vincent but I perceive his vote as superfluous). And to catalyze discussion.

Hmm interesting analysis on the last 2 votes. It is agreeable that AoD's vote made unvoting and saving KevinH's neck unlikely. But I'm still pegging Carl Vincent as townie since his vote would be a vote of superfluity. I want to know from AoD why he didn't unvote given the explanation that his scenarios could be prevented if a normal Doc was in play.

They are at each other's throats. I don't think you can call that 'distancing' even. But assuming you are correct, may I know why you think so?

It's ok to change game styles but I think it's not ok to want to appear townie at the expense of your convictions or beliefs of lynching someone. Actually, that is partially the reason why KevinH was lynched by you guys, because he was inconsistent with No Lynch and a harmless Lynch vote, the purpose of which he said was to appease anti-No Lynch crowd. You're doing the same. I get what you're saying. Everyone wants to reach the end and play a critical/heroic role. But if you're really town, your goal first and foremost should NOT be lynching for the sake of appearing townie but lynching for the sake of killing scum, which would entail a strong conviction despite possible misperceptions.

Ooops. Sorry. There you were. Well then, my analysis for junk applies to you as well, except you didn't unvote. So my question to you is why didn't you place a serious vote?

I just noticed Kaziocore isn't included in the last official vote count of Narsis. He should be in the Not Voting. This post is just for easy vote reference.