Robert2424

Corn Muffin....

made to V. I

V

III

II

5

I'm not on the list?

saying that a certain individual visited somebody else dose not mean there auto scum. just means they have a night action. Weather u think the action is scum related could be up for debate. Say, if one person targeted you, but you didn't die, most we know they didn't have a killing role. but since 3 people visited you, I find the interesting. although I personally don't see why they'd try to kill you. I forget who mentioned it, but I completely agree with them that most likely scum would of tried to kill theo(Who got replaced). (At least this is me trying to predict where scum will try to kill). Course, we got an interesting spin on things now. So the question is as follows, protection role. If somebody protected somebody, meaning preventing the night, kill, or was it B, a role block that went right. If A is true, seems we've been lied to our multiple protection roles. But my take on the situation going on over 24 hours no sleep. Yeah, bed time for me. Hope this made sense.

Was what I was getting at. I'd like to know who visited him. Course, speaking of Irman, would like more activity out of him.

This thread will always fail as Montosh is very very very active on the forums. just saying... IV

Sure, I'm in...weird setup though.

Then, who visited you Yates?

ok, cought up now, and have time to post. Simternity, your confusing me....have you played mafia before? I think you owe us all an explanation. So, now that I'm cought up. Anybody have something to say to me?

Gotta catch up here. Btw, lets actually play the game half way decent today maybe Yates?

Yeah, this thread has went off the deep end. I think it should be closed soon. (Not that the original intent was bad, its went too far.) Idk who moderates these parts of the forum, but they might want to take a closer look at this before things get to far out of hand. I'm no longer gonna pay any more attention to the thread as its went to far.

Not to dish on a show I've never seen. Why is it "holy". But yes reporters love to ask, "what do u think of gays?" or "Do u think a marriage should only be between a guy and a girl" Especially if they think they'll get, "I think being is a sin" or "Yes, I think marriage should be between a guy and a girl". Why, draws huge amount of attention to there interview to make there story BIGGER then it actually is. Period. Where its blown out of proportion. while this is one person opinion, something else get bad rap for it. Witch is dumb. Then, the gays get up in arms about it. (Btw, I think its ok to be gay(I have friends that are, a guy who likes guys, and a girl who's bi), have no problem if they leave me out of it, but I think marriage should be between a man and women). Now I just hope IRON don't get a bunch of criticism cause I said that. Just putting this out there.

Maybe, but I still don't see him helping the town any way. I doubt people will come to support it anyways. So really, what choices do I have atm? I'm not gonna support yates insanity, that for sure. Course if he turns up scum then the guy he tracked(Can't remember who, just woke up and my notes have gone missing) he's scum also. so.....for the sake of activity and I want some answers. unvote Vote Killgor\ till he explains his reasoning or I find something worth my time voting.

again, anybody anti yates is scum. very defensive yates.

well, this is going smoothly, I'm not a fan for isoc lynch and not really a fan for the Imran, so, might as well place my vote somewhere where it actually would be useful for the town. Especially with killgor just going meh, and then voting. That's helpful. Vote Yates Should be obvious why.

Yates, I'm still trying to figure out a reason not to vote for you. Sure you make activity, and got us info. But really, your only GAINING INFO ON TOWN. MEANING THE ANTI TOWN ARE GETTING AN ADVANTAGE ON HOW YOU PLAY. Anti town must be in love with you right now. You've most likely outed our doc (as I don't see how he's not at this point). Then somehow got EM to claim also, although I don't see it entirely necessary for him to do so. Right now you are gunning for the people who haven't liked you much from day 1. why you caving to pressure in such a way? Maybe you should take a step back and take a look on how your making yourself look. If anybody else comes across as anti Yates you gonna start making a case against them? Your pretty much OMGUSing now. To answer your q, although right now, I don't see why I should even give you the pleasure of acknowledging you other then a big fat vote on you. Yes, there were times were not all of the anti were on the wagon. Although, there are times, where all anti were on also. But majority of the time, there been at least 1 anti on the wagon. I can't recall a time there hasn't been one. Also, why you assuming there only 3 scum? How would you know that Info if it were to a be true?

Ok, I think I've caught up now. @Yates, simply, how is Theo in question? because of his name seems out of place? I'm not saying if Theo is not the doc, that the doc should come out and rc(That's suicide, and will still hurt the town), but since he hasn't, you pushing him in the spotlight is still not helping the town. Until somebody counters him, I see no reason why we should lynch him. also, Your argument, that people not on Kevin wagon is probable scum is total Cr**. Since Kevin was a townie, people on the wagon I'm more suspicious of. And rightfully so, in my experience, at least one scum is on the first successful wagon. Weather it was successful in lynching a anti, or it ended up killing a town. Heck, Commander Sheperd was voting for me, but hey, he was town. Muted Faith, the guy who naiborised you (I Think, that part is a bit clumsy how you put that out there) who people believe as town also. Iron Helix, innocent child... so you go after the only two left who weren't on the wagon, one who was voting for you (Isoc) and then me, who isn't really for day 1 lynches. The more and more you post, the more I dislike your play style and more I get a leery feeling about you yates. Now, for your RC, witch by the way, confused me for a min there, you a tracker, like I said you'd probably be, but you claimed EM targeted you. Witch I think he said, witch I need to look back still and see if you stated that after he said that. you all play a very interesting way of mafia, I'll admit that. Qwite difffernt then where I normally play mafia. I'm seeing new stuff allot here. I'm not sure what to make of EM at this point. Gots my mind in a knot. Empowering, I've heard of it, but never see It in action. I'll try to keep this not to long as it is a double post. (I think, unless I get sniped), I'll post my suspicion list later, but right now, I'll say Yates is still on there.

Hey people, still catching up. but my first take on this so far, @Yates, trying to throw poo on me now it seems, after what you've done, I'm surprised your posting as much as I've seen you post. I should have a large post coming after I catch up.

Yeah Yates, your playing a really bad townie right now or just awful scum. I'd like to see your role claim now. I'm 1 post away from putting my vote on you. That is a horrible way to play. If Town, your screwing the town, if anti, your role fishing hard. and somehow got away with outing probably our doc. So really, give me a reason why is should NOT vote for you. Cause really, I don't see a better alternative.

Well, somehow, my suspect list seems to be on the floor now. Yates is pushing hard on Theo, Yates have a few votes on him. Iman is lurking. EM posting little content in his posts, and when it dose, it seems to add more confusion. only people not is CoD, and Lyner. Hopefully 1 of them at least is scum. Well, Theo still hasn't RC'd, and frankly, I don't he's going to as I don't think Yates is going to. So ether people other then Yates and Theo need to ether A: Prosue one of them, or B: Prosue a different lead. Personally, if we're not sure on ether, I'd rather go for one of the inactives before the day is all said and done. and Irman lurking would would make him a possibility for me.

You're missing something. If there are two factions [as today's post would seem to indicate] then at least one of those factions - it is safe to assume - has a way of finding and/or blocking members of the other faction. A third option would be an arsonist/poisoner type of role but those are significantly less common. Also, Theo needs to be significantly more forthcoming with his information. His assertion that he is "assuming" I am scum based on the fact that he knows I know he had a night action is exactly the OPPOSITE of a Town response. Let's say you were a doctor as an example, Robert. And last night you tried to protect someone. If I voted you off the bat and said you needed to explain yourself, what would your response be? Would you assume I was scum, as Theo is claiming, OR would you think to yourself, "Gee, how would Yates know I visited someone last night unless he had some type of investigative ability?" If I were a doctor. You voted for me right off the back. Well gee, outing that I had a night action puts a target on my back to the bad guys(So good job with that, that'll help the town), I'd know you were ether a Watcher, or a tracker. There isn't any other role you could possible be. I probably, would not vote you back, but try to play it cool. Trying to get the Inevitable heat off me so the bad guys won't think about targeting me at night. A doc is a very delicate role to play. You don't want to role claim as your are 99.9% chance of dying that night. So I'd have to refuse to role claim for the sake of the town not losing the doc, unless we have a Watcher, then maybe sacrifice myself, avoid being lynch, get a better chance of lynching somebody else, while I probably going to die that night, The watcher should watch me and the Town should lynch whoever killed me. So really, you outing Theo has any sort of night action if he is town, puts a target on his back. This info that you have should be used later in the game really. Not put out for all eyes to see.