LordRagnar

I've modded one like this, but I only had one killer and the other scum had other roles. If the killer died, the next in line would inherit the role. No one knew who each other was so the scum couldnt just autowin. It was an interesting setup.

And you all thought I was crazy about thinking the scum didn't know who each other were It was an interesting game though.

So therefore, my "role claim" is ordinary gang member/town.

I do not have any more information on who is scum than any of the regular town members do.

Have you ever thought that if he did and when I was lynched it was revealed I was town, which is what will happen, that it would make him look suspicious. Of course he's not going to vote for me because it'll put the target on himself whenever the lynch is over. It is a good strategy albeit but I do not buy the doctor claim, as if he were a doctor and so sure I was scum he would have no problem voting me, but by him not wanting to vote for me that signifies an effort of not wanting to paint a target on himself when I am lynched and it is revealed I am town.

Well, role-claiming is typically a tactic of scum so that the real person who has the role they are claiming will come out. I think there are more than one scum left.

Well, I'll ask this. Do you think there are more than two scum left? We already lynched one iirc.

Or either the scum know you are scum and they do not want to vote for you. Or, either the other scum are/is (not sure how many are left) voting for you because when you die and it is found out that you are a cop it wouldn't look bad on them as they voted for a cop.

Or they could both be scum and know that so they are not voting for each other. Just pointing out the obvious.

Yet you still base your vote on assumptions that you assume are true based on your own personal backing. I believe what I meant was, I did not want to vote the following round as I did not want to help the scum get one closer to an autowin by just taking a random shot in the dark and jumping on a bandwagon or drawing a conclusion based on poorly deduced arguments. When I have no evidence proving anyone in this game is scum or not due to the lack of evidence we had in the first two rounds. It also explains why I chose to not lynch anyone in the first round as there was absolutely nothing to go by.

But I doubt anyone is informed of anyone else's roles, so the scum could be voting for scum and not even know it. As well as the other way around. It is not a good tactic to lynch someone based on voting or not because hardly anyone knows the role of the person they are voting for unless their role allows them too or the scum is told who the other scum are. In the case of the latter, voting based on how people vote would be a good tactic, but I do not know if that is the case in this game so I prefer not voting over voting for someone just to vote. We would all just be voting upon opinions instead of facts and hope for the best.

Also, none of your cases make sense. Since I did not vote, how does that make a cop? A cop would want to vote for people as it helps them win. In no way does random lynching help the town win as it takes one player out of the game which helps the cops get 1 closer to an auto-win.

Not enough info to vote, but I agree with KevinH now. Zenonia was on the first bandwagon on day 1 to start the lynching so he is most likely a cop. Sorry if I do not feel like lynching innocent people when we have no evidence to go by. How many cops does everyone think there is with the members we had to start and we already killed one? Draws on Zenonia Edit to fix grammar.

I would agree with Kevin. Unfortunatey, there is not much to base a lynch off of so far.

I have, yes. Not with you guys though.