Zacch

Sign me up

No politics please

If it wasn't for those damn kids

Well I can't say I didn't see this coming... Although its a bit convenient that you would wait until AFTER Imran signed up as a replacement before making your accusation. The fact that Kevin was actively looking for a replacement as early as last night should have been firm confirmation that NE was indeed inactive, yet even in your post above, you try to make it seem like this FACT is still up for debate. With less than two (2) full pages of posts for this entire game, there is not much to go on for Imran, but I would like to point out a few things; First is the obvious LS self hammer assist, which you claim was an accident or rather you "forgot" that he could do that. Second, which is less obvious, your activity level in this game has been far greater than in previous games. Most games you'll post in the beginning of the game day and then not show up again until the next day, this game has been different, not only are you posting more often, but in general it feels like your keeping much closer tabs on the game thread. And third is your "I know I'm town, so that makes you scum post above". Vote: Isoc

Isoc, can you clarify why you gave LS an opportunity to self hammer? Given the lack of activity in this game, I don't think it changed anything, but conventional logic would have been to hold LS at hammer minus 2 until deadline to allow for further discussion.

The right is bad, everyone knows it. If it wasn't for the over 50 vote, the right would be a minor party.

Pretty sad competition in the republican party, what's your plan if trump wins? He will not be allowed to run for a third term, who's the next republican candidate? Sad truth is you don't have one. The reason why trump is so popular on the right is because all the other candidates are hot trash.

Seems like there is no hammer or Kevin is not accepting a self vote from LS. Would be nice to hear from CJ and NE (still hasn't posted at all).

Vote: LS

DEAD GAME

Inactivity is the friend of scum.

A bold strategy. Just noticed this too. A mislynch guarantee's a mafia win. Vote: No lynch That might not be the case, Kevin what's the tie breaker rules? Lets play this out with a mislynch on day 1, mafia cannot kill on night 1 (even night only) so that makes it 2v2 on day 2. If its first to two (2) votes, then yes mafia can coordinate a preemptive strike on town to open day 2 and seal the win. But if the tie breaker is random, then that leaves town with some protection (50/50). Either way I do agree with no lynch once everyone checks in. We are still waiting for 40% of the players to post for the first time.

Reminds me of the time when brewers intentionally did not read his role pm, despite being active in the game.

Northern Empire and Lord Sunday need to report in.

Does a bear poop in the woods? Vote: Northern Empire

More Bumpage, Major Bumpage.

Yup Thats why I believe no lynch should only be day 1, and anyone fails to vote on day 2 or later should be mod killed.

Sign me up

Active but somewhat reserved in your approach. Almost like you were scouting for night targets instead of leading a wagon. We both thought you were a power role, governor or cop, we got lucky and you turned out to be the cop.

NE had figured us out, but luckily for us, couldn't push the wagons. Sometimes the hard part is not figuring out who is scum, but convincing your fellow town members to vote for them. With the final vote, I was worried that the governor would vote to lynch to start twilight, but we got lucky that our wagon was on the governor, negating that outcome.

Not much has changed, deadline is approaching.. Vote: NE

it was simply that, i believe, it has benefitted the scum role by having a no lynch- assuming their kills have been used at this point it is safe to say those advocating for no-lynch are likely scum, i identified 2 player who could very well be scum ( time will tell) and then i selected one of them , i subsequently i am targeted by that person it would confirm they are in fact scum. and i was correct. as Zacch has singled me out - it would indicate my logic is sound, he as well as my previous vote would make sense. as for my absence- we have been having storms and the power /internet has been down, on a good note- the skiing will be fabulous this weekend, 38 inches of snow cover on the double diamonds , 55 inches at the peak. https://www.stowe.com/ We had a no lynch because only two people voted. And that no lynch is the reason why it is 3v2 right now and not 2v2. I don't think you understand what 2v2 means..

36 Hours till deadline. NE has on consecutive days cast early votes to lynch without much detail into his logic for doing so and then proceeded to disappear for the rest of the day. On day 2 he voted for me, his logic was that I fos'd him and then fos'd cap and then voted no lynch. When pressed to provide examples for these fos's, he disappears for the rest of the day. On day 3 he votes early and admits it was a coin flip, again when pressed on his logic, he disappears for the rest of the day (I'm sure he will conveniently show up today or right before deadline now that I'm calling him out). It also feels like he's playing differently than he has played in previous games, something feels off. We know he's not the most experienced player, but he could be using that perception to his advantage. I feel like anyone else playing like this would have drawn a lot more suspicion for their early votes and disappearing afterwards. In my opinion, NE is either the Governor (trying to bait a bandwagon) or Scum. If nothing changes by deadline, I will be voting for NE.

I don't think we have enough information to draw a conclusion on who Cap investigated on night 1. In the instance of NE, CoD and Myself, Cap raised suspicion of the ease at which CoD and NE agreed with his assessment. And in my case, being voted on by NE after I voted no lynch. Its more than possible in any of those three (3) instances, he could have been trying to bait scum out by presenting false suspicion of someone he knew was town to see if anyone would try to bandwagon. Especially with a Governor Role in play who could protect town against a quick hammer by scum.

No lynch votes do not inherently favor scum. Doing so now would favor scum. We had hoped to buy time for the cop to get some results to claim but the scum got lucky and killed him. iSoc has been very quiet through Day 2 and no posts yet Day 3 (though I hadn't posted today yet either until now.) It seemed oddly convenient that other than the posts at the beginning of the day where Imran attempted to paint himself as a townie which initiated an argument he disappeared until the end of the day and then dropped a "sorry Ive been busy with IRL". Entirely possible but seems a little odd. Voting early on no information helps scum immensely if you are town. If you vote a townie they can both bandwagon the vote through, which will guarantee them a win. The governor role is still in play, we just have never hit the vote threshold to hammer anyone yet so that role has been negated by inactivity. But if Scum did bandwagon and that resulted in a hammer, the governor could step in during twilight to stop it.