Kverst

that's just not true

Sorry, I didn't count when I voted. I didn't hammer it through though.

VI

no

look at us losers yup we are a couple of losers. kverst is winner I agree, you are a bunch of losers

I'm gonna go no lynch for now. vote no lynch

nope

Bragging about never being lynched, huh? We're getting a little close though. Brewers always likes a d1 lynch, so I'm gonna have to counter him on this one. unvote

damn, I was saved so many times. But alas.

How has he not been lynched in any of his games? This is bs. I call hacks. You brought this on yourself, haha. vote brewers

to what though?

II

aaaaand more chaos begins

Sounds interesting. I'd like to join.

In

PMC

I was specific with the role because that's what brewers gave me and you all were pushing for the name and more information. I don't know the significance of the name. I know nothing about GoT.

VIII

The world isn't "crashing down around me", I am simply restating that my votes have been on people that I had a reason to vote for. For iSoc, that was d1 where we had to pick someone and he was supposed to go to trial by combat. For MK, I voted him for the obvious reason of him triggering iSoc's immediate death and skipping the trial by combat. It's not as if I was the only one to vote MK, either. Quite a few others also did the same. My votes alone aren't that suspicious. You said you needed a name, but I don't see the use of names in a game that doesn't require knowledge of GoT (which I don't know anything about). Anyways, I am Rhaegal, one of the three dragons born to Daenerys (vanilla townie)

VI

Well, there you go. 4 votes. I still don't believe I have done anything wrong in following what I think. If you all want to regulate my play style and how I act, I'm sorry, but it's not going to happen. Since you all seem so hell bent on lynching me, I guess I'm going to have to RC even though there is no solid evidence against me other than that you think using my vote means I'm scum. I am a vanilla townie. It's probably too late for this anyways, but I didn't think that using my vote and explaining why would be grounds for being lynched. So be it.

Yeah, 3 votes...not in trouble. If voting for someone because I think they are suspicious is "sheeping" (and incriminating) just because others also think they are suspicious, how does anything get done? I gave a legitimate reason for my vote. It was not because I followed others without thinking for myself.

Ok, here's my line of thinking. No one is coming forward with anything. My vote on Robert isn't "out of the woodworks"(-LordSunday) , I gave a legitimate reason for voting Robert. I said that we should stop talking about Brewers' jester issue. Robert immediately went right back to it. To me, that is him keeping our conversation on a topic that won't get the town anywhere. I bring this up because I don't want it to seem like I am just sheeping or randomly hopping on wagons for no reason. Someone is salty @CM, Jesters are more Bastard roles, not used unless to piss off the masses. I don't dislike the mod, I'm saying for this game he can't be entirely trusted. Other people agreed with me in that Robert was leading the discussion away from productivity. Yehom posted before me, and SM hopped on after I posted. My vote wasn't a hammer vote, nor was it definitively going to lead to a lynch. @LordSunday I don't know what pattern you're referring to. If it's the timing of my posts, I cannot help what time and who posts before I am able to get on and post. Also, I wasn't hopping onto any wagons that were undoubtedly going to result in a lynch (iSoc was supposed to go to trial by combat, and I made it clear that I didn't like what MK did) or that I would have hammered through. Then are you saying I shouldn't use my vote? The deadline is approaching and we still haven't done anything.

IV

that's extremely unfortunate...