Unvote.

 

Vote: Imran Ehsan

 

Well, I guess mine is in the right place then, scum.

 

 

You are either scum masquerading as a Vt or a VT who isnt helping the town much by not posting or voting. Either way, the town doesnt lose much by lynching you. If we are gonna lynch might as well lynch someone who doesnt want a voting record on him by not voting at all.

 

Also,

 

FOS: Angel Cruz de la Sant

 

Unvote.

 

Vote: Imran Ehsan

 

Well, I guess mine is in the right place then, scum.

 

 

You are either scum masquerading as a Vt or a VT who isnt helping the town much by not posting or voting. Either way, the town doesnt lose much by lynching you. If we are gonna lynch might as well lynch someone who doesnt want a voting record on him by not voting at all.

 

Also,

 

FOS: Angel Cruz de la Sant

 

 

Yes, remember that time you lynched a townie? I do.

 

And you're gonna lynch another one. Using inactivity as an excuse, no more. Why do you want to lynch Angel again?

 

 

Unvote.

 

Vote: Imran Ehsan

 

Well, I guess mine is in the right place then, scum.

 

 

You are either scum masquerading as a Vt or a VT who isnt helping the town much by not posting or voting. Either way, the town doesnt lose much by lynching you. If we are gonna lynch might as well lynch someone who doesnt want a voting record on him by not voting at all.

 

Also,

 

FOS: Angel Cruz de la Sant

 

 

Yes, remember that time you lynched a townie? I do.

 

And you're gonna lynch another one. Using inactivity as an excuse, no more. Why do you want to lynch Angel again?

 

 

Well you are not inactive. You are just trying to lay low. You had a omgus vote on Day 1 on CS as your only contribution. Day 2 its a omgus on me after I pushed you to vote for someone. so you are omgusing anyone who prods at you and lying low at other times.

 

reason for FOS on angel was posted previously. plus he also is not voting for anyone.

This voice is nonchalant

There was supposed to be a better ouctome on day 1. If people actually showed up "today" this thread would be filled with pages of speculation.

 

 

Supposed to be? You mean amidst all the wild, irrational, baseless utterances you actually expected a better outcome than the one we got?

 

Lynching on the first day has the highest probability of lynching a townie. This is Mafia 101. To boot, the townie was "special". And do you know who lead the madness? Shepherd did.

 

You've got 6+ pages of utter babble and those responsible for that lynch are strewn all across those pages. Why don't we start there.

And lynching on the first page gives 100% chance of actually gaining information. Following your reasoning we might as well wait till day 4 or 5, since the probability to lynch a townie is much less. Yes, if people actually came into this thread, the day would have gone a lot better, you are even acknowledging that info was gained from lynching on day 1 pointing to the pages of "babble"

Amongst the mafia community it is known that Day 1 lynching has the highest rate of success in all, if not most game scenarios.

Also those being more active score more townie points than those that mostly lurk. Blascowicz fit that bill and has only became more active when the votes started piling up. He still remains the strongest lynch candidate.

So let me get this straight Imran, you're voting for Angel because he voted for scum as a "common strategy".

 

Everything here is common strategy to deceive. If someone does not vote for scum, he's a scum. If someone does vote for a scum. he's trying to play safe because he's a scum. If someone wants to lynch early, it's because they're the baddies, if someone doesn't then they're trying to withhold information, thus evil. Truth be told, we have little evidence for one side or the other. And you did the exact same thing you accuse Angel of in the first page.

So let me get this straight Imran, you're voting for Angel because he voted for scum as a "common strategy".

 

Everything here is common strategy to deceive. If someone does not vote for scum, he's a scum. If someone does vote for a scum. he's trying to play safe because he's a scum. If someone wants to lynch early, it's because they're the baddies, if someone doesn't then they're trying to withhold information, thus evil. Truth be told, we have little evidence for one side or the other. And you did the exact same thing you accuse Angel of in the first page.

 

No. Scum and him voted for each other. This is a strategy I have seen used before to throw off voting trends and is normally done in the RVS stage and when there are not many votes on each other. But my suspicion of Angel is not based on only that. I just have a feeling that his posts are just off somehow. I wont push anyone else to vote for on that though. But I can still do a FOS on him if I wish.

I would like you to explain what you mean by "off"

I'm going to do something, I swear.

You swore to us. So far you haven't done anything. You wouldn't want to be labeled a liar now would you?

 

I'm going to do something, I swear.

You swore to us. So far you haven't done anything. You wouldn't want to be labeled a liar now would you?

 

Later tonight, I'm a bit busy now.

I'll go over the entire day.

Meh, it's definitely the safest for scum to claim VT. If it was a power role we might have something interesting, but meh. This game really did nosedive in terms of activity, didn't it

 

Lynching on the first day has the highest probability of lynching a townie. This is Mafia 101. To boot, the townie was "special". And do you know who lead the madness? Shepherd did.

 

Night 1 had some good success, perhaps if we did not lynch then we would not have had that success.

 

 

This day seems to have lasted a almost a full month, even now I can not really contribute as much as I would like but perhaps I don't need to try and find answers when there is no answers to find yet as the information is still poor.

I was going to vote Blaskowicz as a way to help to end this day and bring life into the game with a new day and night. 

Blaskowicz is somewhat of a shady character.

 

 

 

That being said what are the thoughts on the voting pattern of Teufel who was scum?

 

Commander Shepard, killgor, Electric Mango, Angel Cruz dela Sant,Blaskowicz, Kaziocore, Ovidsidios, zenonia

Are all the people that didn't vote Teufel when his vote count was rising, I included zenonia because he quickly took away he vote from Teufel even though Teufel was 4 votes away from being lynched at that point, which shows he had no intention of applying pressure for one reason or another.

 

Vote: Teufel

Oh crap, I meant

 

Vote: zenonia

/me Manifests enough energy to throw a plate at Zenonia 

 

I'm not sure why he would specifically throw a plate at me though ._.

I think Day 3 will bring us new hope and better discussion. Lets put this day behind us and get on with the lynch.

How many votes are needed to end the day?

I thought I already posted saying 6 votes, but it is 6 votes I think.

 

Prod everyone again?

i don't think there is a point prodding anymore

 

Vote:Blaskowicz

 

End the day >_> (Jesus take the wheel)

To hell with it

 

Vote: Blaskowicz

Ready for day 3

*prods the mod*

 

Sorry, here

 

 

 

Vote Blask

 

 

That should be six now. I hope this is a good vote. We literally used nothing, but then again I guess the ideal conditions for rooting out Mafia's must be adapted to our current predicament.

 

Ah well. Just to prove you guys.

 

Vote: Blaskowicz