Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

IRON Forums Website

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

[KH-23] 2x5 Mafia - MAFIA wins

Featured Replies

I'm going to freaking quit this shit, if lww votes me.

Dang that's kind of tempting though :P

 

All his actions are on people who are dead.

Convenient.

This is scum rc 101.

Like how can you not see this?

Yeah that's actually a good point. He also claimed to visit the person who was killed, which isn't necessarily damning in this instance, but generally is a thing you see in scum RCS.

 

Also @brewers, why would you suggest on D3 that the motion detector should maybe claim if you were the motion detector? I mean I guess you can say that you were trying to throw mafia off, but it seems weird to think up an elaborate strategy for someone else to consider acting on if you knew that you were the only person who could consider it.

 

MK already has two votes thanks to Rafay doing what Rafay does best and quick voting at the start of a LYLO day lol, and I'm leaning towards brewers anyway, so I'll even the votes for now.

 

Vote: brewers

  • Replies 234
  • Views 19.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I did that on d3 to see if people thought it was a good idea for me to RC, since I could confirm rafay was town. I didn’t want to come out and RC as the motion detector if it wasn’t a good idea, as I wasn’t 100% sure on it being a good idea at the time. And only you weighed in on it, so I basically had to decide on my own. And I chose not to because I didn’t think confirming one townie at the time was worth gaurnteeing the doctor not saving a kill since scum would know the doctor was on me and would just avoid targeting me.

 

Also I’m confused how you are saying MK brought up a good point when he said all of my targets were killed. The only person I targeted who died was CoD, and me picking him literally fits with me having no idea what he could be… if I was scum I could have just picked literally anyone else, since everyone’s ones roles were now known when I posted my RC…

 

MKs reasoning behind who he picked just doesn’t make sense. He literally said he picked you on d3 for annoying him… well when did you annoy him other than on D4 when you kept delaying the game because reasons???

Plus @lww, if I was gonna fake claim I would have just said I was the doctor cause let’s be real, MK is always chomping at the bits to vote for you lol

Yeah right.

One night, didn't submit any action.

One dead target.

One target was rafay (cause let's be real, saying rafay is town when RCing is like being a double voter)

The other one happened to be me, why not lww?

You were literally screaming at lww to end the day, if you were town, you would have picked lww to check.

Until then, i was not really scummy

Lww was pretty scummy yesterday.

So you would have definitely checked out lww, instead of me.

Like you didn't throw any shade at me all game, you were pissed at lww.

Yet you picked me to target.

 

These are all convenient targets for scum.

No possible way to verify.

 

While all targets are all verifiable.

And lww did confirm he did an action yesterday.

And i didn't vote for lyner until the end (and if there's anything I can be trusted to do, is voting out limey)

 

You yourself said that your target for n1 was obvious (aka Imran) i confirmed that

 

Like all my targets are confirmable by either the target or my previous actions.

 

None of them is verifiable.

Yeah, there's rafay, but even if he did an action, he would say he didn't. (And I'm not lying here, like in one of tw's game, i think, lyner or someone, was the tracker and he said that Rafay was seen visiting someone, and rafay said he didn't visit anyone, but he did)

 

You conveniently picked your targets, i didn't.

 

 

And the reason you picked to rc as motion detector is not cause of me wanting to lynch lww

It's cause rafay is already voting for me.

 

So you know if you can hold out till deadline, you will win, since i got to 2 votes before your wagon did.

And considering the fact that iSoc isn't exactly active that much, that possibility is realistic.

 

 

So iSoc,if you are reading this, vote for brewers.

Rafay, take your vote for me out. You can revote for me, if you want, afterwards.

  • Author

Vote count


Lord MK (2): Rafay, Brewers 2.0,
Brewers 2.0 (2): Lord MK, lilweirdward,
iSocialism 2.0 (0):
lilweirdward (0):
Rafay (0):
 
No Lynch (0):
 
Not voting:  iSocialism 2.0,

 
With 5 alive, it takes 3 to lynch, or 2 at deadline.
Deadline is Monday, August 30 at 0800 EDT

Uhhh velocity wasn’t active so how would he have submitted his action? Lol

 

 

And also you keep saying I picked someone who died… well you picked two people who died…

 

So why is it okay for you to pick two people who died but not for me to have picked one? That makes no sense

You yourself verified one of my target and i wasn't voting lyner till the end.

My actions at night line up with my actions during daytime.

 

Whereas you don't have that.

uhhh yes my actions do line up.  which one of my actions does not line up with my daytime actions???

 

 

Said i was very confident rafay was town-- because I got no action on him

 

Was not sure about CoD, he was a complete unknown to me-- so I checked him.

 

If anything yours do not add up.

 

You said I said something on Day 2 that made you suspicious of me.... yet you wanted until N4 to check me

 

And you said on N3 you checked LWW cause he was annoying you... but it wasnt until D4 where he stared acting annoying

 

 

 

You yourself verified one of my target and i wasn't voting lyner till the end.

 

you could have easily made that up too.  I stated that it was obvious who I picked N1 as brewers 1.0,  and your claim of checking imran came after that, so it would be a pretty easy/fair assumption to make

 

Plus, Kevin stated I am not actually allowed to disclose who I targeted that night, so there would be zero way for me to refute your claim without breaking the rules...

Also, I just want to throw this out there... the entire day 2, MK stayed off imran, he was voting ferastical

 

 

 

Vote count Imran Ehsan (5): lilweirdward, Rafay, Brewers 2.0, Chaplain of death, Lyner, Brewers 2.0 (1): Imran Ehsan, Ferastical (1): Lord MK, iSocialism (0): lilweirdward (0): Captainjf (0): Chaplain of death (0): Lord MK (0): Lyner (0): Rafay (0):  
 

 

MK only chnaged his vote to Imran at the very very end, when it was beyond clear he was going to be lynched

 

Vote: Imran.

I didn't check you then, cause more suspicious people were around then

 

Also,.lww always annoys me, so I don't know why you think that i need a particular time to be pissed at lww.

 

 

Yeah on d2, I thought that Imran was too scummy.

I was actively trying to get people to vote out inactives.

 

 

N3, i did Lilwad, cause i was being annoyed by him.
 

 

okay, so what did LWW do before you checked him on D3 to annoy you?

 

Saying 

 

,.lww always annoys me
  is just a cop out.  You stated you specifically checked him because you were being annoyed by him, but the annoyance from him didnt come until AFTER you say you checked him.  Plus even after you claimed to have checked him, you said you were neutral on him... if he was annoying you at that point and you got a result that he did an action, you saying that youre neutral on him would not be consistent with the actions... you would know there is a 50/50 chance he was scum.  

So just to sum up, according to MK, the reasons I am scum are as follows:

 

-First he claimed all of my targets were dead people, when in fact only one was dead.  And its very ironic since MK actually targeted more dead people than me.

 

(Also his claim of targeting imran makes even more sense as scum...  he would know as imran's partner if I role blocked imran since obviously imrans action would have been reported as not successful or no result)

 

- Next he claims I am scum because my actions do not line up with my behavior during the day, except it does.  I stated I was very confident Rafay was town, because I got no result from rafay, and I also said CoD was a complete unknow to me, so I naturally checked CoD.  All the while, MKs actions, especially his check of LWW do not fit with his claims during the day

 

So if you apply MK's own reasoning to why I am scum to his actions/claims, he would be painting himself as scum even moreso than he is trying to paint me as scum.  

  • Author

Vote count


Lord MK (2): Rafay, Brewers 2.0,
Brewers 2.0 (2): Lord MK, lilweirdward,
iSocialism 2.0 (0):
lilweirdward (0):
Rafay (0):
 
No Lynch (0):
 
Not voting:  iSocialism 2.0,

 
With 5 alive, it takes 3 to lynch, or 2 at deadline.
Deadline is Monday, August 30 at 0800 EDT

My vote stays on MK.

 

But how about we vote out iSoc? then NK will tell us more?

if we vote out isoc town loses.

scum is either MK and me, since one of us is clearly lying (hint, its MK), and since scum has a 1 shot lynchproof, if we mislynch today, after the NK, it will be 3 alive and the lynch of the scum then wont actually kill them so scum will win

 

We have to lynch MK today, otherwise town looses.   

The choice of lynch is either me or me, since one of us is clearly lying (hint, it's brewers), and since scum has a 1 shot lynchproof, today is lylo.

 

 

We have to lynch brewers today, otherwise town loses.

My vote stays on MK.

 

But how about we vote out iSoc? then NK will tell us more?

Quick voting on LYLO. Throwing out an awful idea that would be an immediate loss for town.

 

Yep, Rafay is definitely town this game lol.

  • Author

Vote count


Lord MK (3): Rafay, Brewers 2.0, iSocialism 2.0,
Brewers 2.0 (2): Lord MK, lilweirdward,
iSocialism 2.0 (0):
lilweirdward (0):
Rafay (0):
 
No Lynch (0):
 
Not voting: 

 
Lord MK, Town Motion Detector, has been lynched.

Night 5: Lilweirdward, Town Doctor, has been killed in the night.

Day 6: Lynch fails on 1x Lynchproof Mafia Goon Brewersalliance 2.0

Night 6: Another townie dies.

Day 7: Not enough votes to secure a lynch.

Night 7: The final townie dies.

Mafia (Imran Ehsan, Brewersalliance 2.0) wins!

Woot woot!!

 

Good game guys

Will say it again, Brewers has the highest possibility of being scum

 

Next are the rest of the 3 inactives on D1

 

If we still lose against 1 mafia that would be hilarious tho

Haha I agree

 

;)

 

Shout out to lyner being hard on me as scum the entire time right out the gate

  • Author

Day 1

  • No lynch

Night 1

  • Brewersalliance 1.0 nightkilled by Velocity (at direction of Imran Ehsan)
  • Imran Ehsan role cops Lyner but is blocked
  • Lilweirdward protects iSocialism
  • Brewersalliance 1.0 roleblocks Imran Ehsan
  • Lord MK motion detects Imran Ehsan

Day 2

  • Imran Ehsan, Mafia Role Cop, lynched

Night 2

  • Brewersalliance 2.0, replacing Velocity, elects to not kill
  • Lilweirdward protects Brewersalliance 2.0
  • Lord MK motion detects Lyner

Day 3

  • Lyner, Vanilla Townie, lynched

Night 3

  • Brewersalliance 2.0 night-kills Chaplain of Death
  • Lilweirdward protects Brewersalliance 2.0
  • Lord MK motion detects Lilweirdward

Day 4

  • iSocialism, Vanilla Townie, lynched

Night 4

  • Brewersalliance 2.0 night-kills Captainjf
  • Lilweirdward protects Rafay
  • Lord MK motion detects Brewersalliance 2.0

Day 5

  • Lord MK lynched

 

 

Scum chat: https://www.quicktopic.com/53/H/838DDhVrB3rG

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.