AKCPLUTO

Well, good game. The Mafia have won.

I am accusing cc in no uncertain terms of being a bandwagoner taking advantage of an inexperienced player who keeps tripping himself up.

I'm thinking cc because he keeps following and duplicating my actions in an attempt to falsely implicate me.

I apologize to my fellow townies insofar as I went on a giant ego trip there and accidentally committed friendly fire. I plead innocent insofar as my role-claim is nevertheless accurate and as ccabal bandwagoned my CD vote. I believe that I am being framed with regard to CD because the scum know that I now look painfully suspicious. They figured that I'd be a sure bet to be lynched in this situation. If I die, you all lose. If so, fin me, fin town, and gg scum.

When's the deadline?

I am not experienced enough to be able to figure out which exact three people are Mafia right here. I am confident enough to vote for you, but not much more.

Did I say that I thought that the other two are mafia? I said that I have my doubts. Stop twisting my words. This is further evidence of you being scum.

To me, CD is the only confirmable scum due to the aforementioned reasoning which has been repeated ad infinitum, whereas I obviously have question marks to a lesser degree on EM and ccabal86.

I have a question mark over ccabal86's head right now. Not a FOS, but pretty close.

TC, in which case, I wouldn't put it past Mole for putting two roles that are this similar in a game like this?

At this point, I would rest my case insofar as CD's voting record speaks for itself, whereas I am a simple and innocent townie who has made a legit role claim that has yet to be undermined. Furthermore, CD's veteran slyness should be kept in consideration insofar as he knows how to pull a few fast ones, which is exactly what he has done throughout the game with the aforementioned votes. With that, I am not sure what else I can or should say. As such, as I said and will say again, I am innocent until proven guilty and so, I invoke my right to remain silent.

I think you have done a magnificent job with your analysis. In my mind, I am innocent until proven guilty. As such, I am going to invoke my right to remain silent.

Reign, it's just that you look suspicious by how you are trying to cover your behind here.

What part of 'vote something' are you not getting, scum? VOTE COUNT CanucksDynasty (1): AKCPLUTO AKCPLUTO (1): CanucksDynasty Not Voting (5): Preston, ccabal86, Electric Mango, reign of terror, TerrorChrist With 7 Alive, 4 is needed to lynch.

Edit by way of post...enough predation on those poor fishies. Vote: Canucks Dynasty. JKing, bro.

My vote remains on CD due to obvious reasons, the history between Kevin and CD, the fact that I am still alive, and CD's early involvement in CC''s lynch. Vote: Canucks [Non-]Dynasty.

I happen to have a whacky conspiracy theory concerning the possibility of a Mafia role where one can pretend to be a lifeguard from the scum side...but that is another conversation for another day, eh?

Interesting how CD is giving TC a free pass even though TC is coming after an obvious townie. My vote on CD stands.

TerrorChrist is misquoting the role, because there is no such thing as an ex-lifeguard; just a cowardly lifeguard. And I am the true cowardly lifeguard. VOTE COUNT CaoCao (5): Electric Mango, CanucksDynasty, KevinH, TerrorChrist, reign of terror CanucksDynasty (2): ccabal86, AKCPLUTO Not Voting (3): Nerau, CaoCao, Preston With 10 Alive, 6 is needed to lynch. 3 is needed to lynch at deadline.

I got sick of bobbing corpses and had to find a new employer, hence my role as a cowardly lifeguard. LOL @ being a fish out of water. I felt like I had to roleclaim because I wanted to set everyone's minds at ease. It's called paranoia.

Preston, I will keep that in mind as I become a better player; that is, to try to provide reasoning as often as possible when making accusations or what have you. In any case, I want to role-claim as a Cowardly Lifeguard. I am a townie except I do not have the ability to hammer vote.

I understand that, Terror. However, I am admittedly being lazy in that I am curious to know if any such spreadsheet already exists, LOL.

Preston, In the last 6 months, there was a game where I attempted to go for a "preemptive strike" in that I began accusing and voting against people on the first day. I ended up getting lynched real fast for talking too much. As such, I am trying to adjust and more under control with regard to what I say, when I say it, and how I say it. It has to do with being more conservative with how I play the game. CD is exactly right in understanding that I am reluctant to speak insofar as I am afraid of running into suspicion. As an aside, It would be nice if I had access to a spreadsheet or document that tracked the history of each player to this point; that is, a log of FoS' and votes. My rationale for voting against CD is because of his involvement in voting against demon on day 1. I also noted how Caocao had the hammer vote, which may be part of the case against him here on day 2. I want to admit that I am somewhat hasty in my conclusion, but I am confident enough in it to move forward.

Hmm, it improperly double posted me...my bad...or more accurately, my internet's bad.

I would prefer not to discuss my rationale insofar as my analysis has been very limited in nature. However, I have a lot of confidence in your competence and judgment.