d3mon

Theophilos 44 Matt Miller 15 Bay102174 38 Crusty Juggler 127

Theophilos 43 Matt Miller 13 Bay102174 38 Crusty Juggler 130

Theophilos 43 Matt Miller 11 Bay102174 38 Crusty Juggler 132

It looks like a slip in an otherwise perfect plan but lets assume for a moment that you are not lying... Hm.. so on day 2, you knew that BeeBs was scum but decided that roleclaiming would hurt the town more than lynching a random guy?? Imho if you knew that BeeBs was scum, you should've roleclaimed, it would've ensured that a scum was lynched and the doc would've protected you during the night phase.. (but thats just my opinion) Anyhow, I don't see any reason to change my vote.. but I hope that I am wrong..

Hm.. so on the basis of your "feeling" you were not only able to guess EM's role but were also able to guess the mechanics of his role.. (at the time of this post EM has not revealed his role) Also, if I believe your role claim, can you explain why you voted for KF2001 on day 2? (since you knew that BeeBs was scum)

How can you be sure that RoT is the cop?? Tbh, every post from you, EM and RoT seems to indicate that you are working together... Also, I noticed that RoT was reading this thread yesterday and has decided not to answer my questions.. so here it goes Vote : reign of terror

I claim the lands of Germany, Italy, Austria, Czech Republic, Poland and Hungary

This is getting really interesting. It seems that all I have to do atm is "vote for BeeBs" and the town has the game in the bag.. The problem is, I still can't understand how RoT was able to guess EM's role.. @RoT, am I missing something? On the other hand, if BeeBs is scum.. then mafia is not doing a great job at defending themselves.. a fake cop claim is pretty easy and would have thrown EM's strategy out of the window.. (tbh, if I was scum, I would have done it by now) Now, another part of the puzzle is KevinH's actions, I have to agree with EM that they don't match what I usually expect from him.. (his hammer vote on KF2001 is another example..) Anyhow, since I am still not sure that RoT is the cop.. I will need more evidence.. @RoT, can you paraphrase your role PM?

I am still not convinced that RoT is the cop. Based on EM's posts (before he roleclaimed), I couldn't have guessed his actual role (there were a number of possibilties i.e. Friendly neighbour, Friends, etc..).. The fact that RoT was able to guess his exact role (Mason), makes me wonder if this is just a well planned move from Mafia. @ EM who can vouch for you?

I would have guessed that he was a friendly neighbour.. but nice guess..

Wow.. this is an interesting turn of events. RoT, unless you are sure that EM is a townie, this was not the best move for the town. ^^ I think the answer to this question will determine my actions..

XV

nevah

nope

Hm.. interesting.. it seems we have 6 votes for lynching KF2001. I guess I should wait for the Mod to reveal whether he was scum or not, but, the fact that the last 3 votes came in a couple of hours makes me wonder if we might have made a mistake.. :S

This might come back to bite me in the ass but imho lynching an inactive (SC) is better than lynching KF2001. Vote: SirCroc @KF2001 The lack of content in your posts is not helping the town.

Scum have made an interesting choice by killing ABD. Now, the way I see it, the scum picked him because either (I am just thinking out loud) 1) Atleast one of SC and KF2001 is scum and they wanted to reduce the number of people who have them in their FOS. 2) Neither of them is scum and they want the town to lynch one of them. 3) They mistook ABD's post after nerau's eod declaration as an evidence of him being a townie power role (who made a newbie mistake.. i.e. post instead of PM). At this time, I see nothing that would tempt me to change my FOS.. So FOS : KF2001 and CD (hopefully replacing SC)

As long as there is a possibility of getting an extension (if needed), I am ok with shorter days

I am almost sure that he is scum

Vote: No Lynch The discussion is almost dead.

Its nothing new.. I have been supporting no lynch on day 1 since my second game. IIRC, I got lynched on day 1 in my first game but I think I was supporting no lynch back then too (or maybe I ended up trying to do that to save my neck ) @Kazio, I think we peaked at 5 votes for no lynch

Well.. I had voted for no lynch and have repeatedly expressed my support for it. But, I guess your reason for suspecting me (being helpful??) is as good as mine for suspecting all the players that are voting for a lynch, this by extension implies that any action/in action can be construed as a proof of scumminess and just validates what I have been saying all along i.e. we dont have enough information on day 1 to lynch..

I think the vote count atm is No Lynch - Kevin H, Reign of Terror Kevin H - ccabal86 Sir Crocodile - Imran Ehsan, Kaziocore Imran Ehsan - BeeBs, SirCrocodile, KF2001 BeeBs - EM Not Voting - ABigDeer, d3mon Mod: plz confirm @KevinH Thats the way I look at it and except Kazio (because he does this in every game ), I still think its a good indicator of who might be scum.

Lynch vs No Lynch At this time, it seems that a lot of people are trying to push for a lynch on day 1. While, I agree that it provides some kind of voting pattern that can be used on day 2, it can also lead to lynching of a townie power role (maybe even the cop) and with a number of first timers in this game.. I would much rather take everyone into day 2. Anyhow, my FoS KF2001 - I find any votes that don't accompany an opinion suspicious.. his unvote had nothing to support it and thus he finds a place in my FoS. SirCrocodile - Editing a post + retaliatory vote on Kazio + bandwagoning with BeeBs.

@ABigDeer Um.. I think you are forgetting a rule