iSocialism

Low post = low post count active = active I'm sorry I was not active posting fluff day one. If posting mattered so much, what does brewer and mk know?

Vote Rafay I mean mk said it was the town thing to do.

Vote Torres For removing your vote on brewer

VOTE Brewer Now we have a race.

Brewer, you just want to cast your vote to see where it will gain traction... that's all. And what is there to post about, all the random BS from d1?

I move to change the game name to the China Virus Mafia.

Velocity, Robert, Nadarr and Kazio, you should all be seeing what brewer is trying to do,which is trying to end this game, and not let it spill into another day. He knows that I can roleblock and once kazio flips town his gig is up, and Nadarr and I still have our role blocks. These lessen their chance of getting a successful kill, and will most likely bring us into day 4 with a solid picture of who the remaining scums are. Nadarrr, brewer wants you investigated, in other words, he is trying to cause doubt about your role to the town players. I believe all three scums are on kazio wagon. They thought it would be an easy lynch choosing someone who is inactive, and wouldn't necessary fight back. Kazio, velocity and robert you guys need to post more. You guys also need to vote for someone even if it is kazio. Only one death during the day will allow us to move onto day 4. WIth three died today and a scum kill tonight that's game. If brewer and TW were so set on kazio being scum they would not need the extra kill today, and let him flipped scum to show everyone they were right. However, kazio flipping town will harm them, and that is why brewer is set on getting more death today.

Carefull, he's like a genie! You want to ask very specifically. Asking for ten votes, could be ten votes on yourself.

My role is when I commute, if someone says target isoc, then nothing happens to me, I don't know what they get back as feedback. If i target person A and person B target person A, then Person B would get results for BOTH person A and myself. It also says that when I go to someone else house to sleep with them, keeps them occupied during the night... My assumption is roleblock... So in an indirect way, I can be untargetable, so for this instance I went after people more scummy to me, because scum would not target scum. Through rereading my role, and paraphrasing, the mod said that I cannot be killed/investigated when I leave, typical commuter. However, I noticed he said when the person house who I'm at. If they are targeted then that person's action is preform on me. This makes me believe even if the person whose house I'm at is killed then I would not. because it said killed/investigate the first time and just their action the second time. I WILL CORRECT MYSELF I went back and reread what brewer said, and I misinterpreted the fact that he said he knew I visited TW. I believe I put two statements together and got them mixed up. He said I thought TW quietness was scummy, to him in our lover's chat, so he made mention of that in the game thread. I thought he said he knew i visited TW. My comment on TW early day 2 was a joke about him being alive must means he is scum. that is all. However, TW is normally the one who adds the most input even when there was not much to talk about. but it seem to me this game, before day 3, that he was not as much as usually. I fully understand RL, but I know some use it as a excused... Though TW is an honorable player and would not use that as a tactic... Still going back, I thought he was a safe target to sleep with Brewer gains bulletproof ability when I visit someone, which would imply that if I'm killed during the night that he would not be. This stuck out at me the second time reading (day 3 is on fire, lots of talking). If I do nothing, and brewer or I are killed, then brewer and I are killed. If I leave, brewer and I are both safe, assuming I'm not killed indirectly. So scenario, brewer is my little toy, I leave him he is safe with bulletproof. If I was part of the scum team, why would brewer need bulletproof. Brewer would be safe from being killed because the scum team wouldn't be like "iSoc don't use you action so we can killed brewer, oh and you"??? This is also to mention that I visited lyner last night, unless I was stopped. nadarr came out as a stopper. I don't think there would be another one plus my possible roleblocker. This means that it is also likely that there was no kill because scum went after him in the hopes to get two with one stone. This would also mean that the scum team would have also needed not to read/understand brewer bulletproof mod which could be because of a inactive scum team. So the unknowns are why wasn't TW action stopped day 2? why was there no kill last night? If I claimed I use my roleclaim on lyner, but brewers said I did not, who stopped me, if any? As for lyner, I'm more stuck on the fact that nadarr said they blocked TW, TW said he got an action. All lyner said was that he can confirm TW claim, that's not much to go on after. But nadarr action claim would need better resolution for myself, before going on to step two.. lyner I know I'm way passed the TL;DR limit, but when your brewers lover, it rubs off on you...... insert innuendo... pun intended... Also noted that brewer thinks I'm scum because of three things. He knew my name which with rafay lynched is now nothing. 2. He thinks I told kazio what to do, brewer wanted rafay lynched anyways, and I also would not tell a scum teammate to do something in a game thread. I really was trying to get more out of rafay.. 3. I'm his lover and I won't look him in the eyes... no wait, he doesn't believe two town players as lovers, so one must be scum. TW thinks I'm scum because of brewer logic and position. I also would say that he doesn't like me questioning him, but I don't know for sure that is a motive. Only early on, did he say I was the other scum because of brewer's theory END TL;DR

If my action was stopped, why did brewer mentioned that my action was on done on TW? Did you guys "conveniently" leave that out (quoted because TW and brewer are both using that same word to try and paint a picture), or was it hard to remember with your well established story? I still don't know how, but brewer knows who I completed my action on. And I'm not buying the, oh but the mod, who won't and cannot confirm or deny it, stopped nadarr action and your action. Sounds too perfect to be true.

Vote TW, I'm going to believe Nadarr here. I believe TW action should have got blocked.

So how did TW not get stopped from using his role?

On the notion that I told kazio to vote Rafay to save himself, is absurd. I would have just voted for Rafay myself at that point, and kazio was two post away from making the count. It strange how brewer went from: - Rafay is scum because of his name, and even if he is town, at least it's just Rafay. - iSoc is scum with Rafay and kazio. - well there's another scum with kazio and isoc. - vote for me cause iSoc will die as well, and we don't want to miss lynch - wait don't believe what I said, don't vote for me - iSoc must die - I have role that would hurt town if you vote for me. AKA town will be sorry if you vote for. Then TW comes out with a statement that clears brewer and makes kazio guilty. - yeah, vote for kazio because TW created traction Brewer, you said town will lose with one miss lynched?

Brewer, why did you say you would be happy to be lynched if it would kill me, but then get mad when people are starting to vote for you?

Holy cow guys take a chill pill. I just skipped the last few statements because the other ones were not going anywhere. My post about the wagon in our lover chat was done around the same time as kazoo post. There's a good chance or very likely chance I made that post without knowing of his vote... so that one is a reach brewer, and you should be sad about making it. It seems you're just retroactively looking for reasons to say I'm scum. My role says I keep my target (the person house I commute to) occupied. My assumption is that it stops there action. Lyner said he didn't have an action, so TW would have to confirmed this, but shouldn't make himself a target. I'm unaware that my action does something to brewer as well. It sounds like there's a few modifiers on this game, some not known. It would be a crazy cocktail, but brewer could have a power that stops him from dying because of "love" with certain limits. This one is a reach though. But since we're are lovers, I would suggest lynching him over me instead. Should be the same outcome but would stop any possible unknowns. Yes, it could be same for myself, but brewers rhetoric calls for it. However, I would prefer not to die, but eew.

#3 Reverse clothes shopping; You walked into the store clothed, go to the dressing stall, get undressed, and put your clothes on the rack.

If I go someone else and you try to kill me, you won't be successful. If you target the person whose place I'm at, then that person and myself will be killed, etc. So I'm not directly targetable, if I use my action, but I still can get killed, etc. indirectly.

If I go to someone house, and if you use your action in me, it wouldn't work, what result you will get is beyond me. However you target the person house I'm at both of us will give results. I did target Lyner last night, n1 no target was selected because I just took over WP role that real life day. It also seems that brewer knows more about my role than I do. I know nothing of brewers role, beside us being "lover." On a personal note, Aaron Rodgers was better at scoring in the Superbowl this year than brewer was in bed. It's why I left most nights to be in someone else's arms.

Well, as brewer has announced that I'm his "lover" and also a commuter that can select who house to go to. From my understanding this also stop myself from being targeted, and I believe stops whoever house I selected and their action to be stopped. I targeted TW n2, and Lyner n3. TW was/is being quiet which raises red flags for me. Lyner was on the lynch of rafay and I believe that there is most likely two scum players on that wagon, so I went with my gut and commuted at Lyner's place. This would have stopped all action from being committed by him. Rafay is always an easy target, and with a little scum persuasion, an easy one to get lynched. With no kill from last night, and with my action, my vote is for... VOTE Lyner Also, lyner is always scum

or don't understand how to prepare, does someone really need two years worth of TP for a respiratory illness or 60 pounds of potatoes? As for the EBT thing, its not really that they only shop once a month, but that they spend all of their EBT credits at once, and don't have left for the rest of the month

well, we still had more time, this hammer won't look for you. but i understand why

First off, if Kazio hammers, I believe that means he does not need to meet the post count requirement. With that notion, Rafay you need to do better at defending/presenting another subject. I would start off with what evidence do you have to assume that robert and brewer are scum, if any besides your typical rhetoric? I could give a whole tl;dr summary of my thoughts, but no one would read it. so to summarize my summary 4 on rafay wagon 4 off, not counting rafay. scum can be 1 on and 2 off, and vi versa. Depending on how rafay flips that will change the layout. I think the town has a lot to gain with a lynch from rafay.

Discussion on kazoo absence... kazio is gone/inactive... discussion ended. What evidence do you have on brewer or Lyner?

Interesting day we have going on now. I'm too am interested in Rafay answers to brewers question

Does Rafay deserve to be lynched?