junkahoolik

cd, when i proposed that strategy yesterday, you and narsis said that the cop could keep quiet if he found a scum and only claim when he found 2 or more. now you say this?? i'm confused...

a basic idea in scum hunting is lynch all those who lie. townies don't need to lie. besides, if a townie lies it won't be helpful for the town because it will create confusion in the long run. so usually, when there are 2 cop claims, one of them is lying and the lier is mafia. of course that depends on the settings of the game. for instance, if there is 1 sane cop and a cop or more that can't investigate well (receives the answers to investigations to be all mafia or all townie or all the opposite of the players affiliation) then they are all telling the truth and no need to lynch them. the real problem is that you can only find out someone's true identity if you lynch him. nobody claimed cop yet.

uum... what kind'a townie would say out loud who he thinks the cop is?? i'm placing a FOS on you.

uuum... whut??

lol falzis, i'm just reading into the no kill

uum... we're hoping they will influence the lynch most of the times??... that way they give themselves out by voting patterns??... and cases??... and being pushy for lynches??... though this day i think a nl is in order.

i think there are 2 enemy factions. 2 mafia and 1 sk. i think they didn't nk cause of the thought that the other would do it. why?? because getting 5 townies dead at the cost of 1 maf player while the others are not even suspected is a good deal imo. of course, there is the possibility that the maf were placed all in the same room bu the chances of that happening are too small to consider. these are my thoughts for the moment.

martino, we have voting patterns. we don't have information regarding a nk. we also don't know if the mafia can move where ever they want to nk. the power roles and the mafia should probably know though. i doubt the cop wasn't announced if he can or can not investigate anyone in the plane. and it's probable that if the cop can investigate everyone, then maf can kill anyone. if he can't, mafia can't kill just anyone, there are still restrictions. i think today we nl and start a regular game of mafia first thing in the morning. as for room placings, i say we change rooms but keep the same partners just in case the rule wasn't modified. that way, if it wasn't, the cop will have scanned both their roommates. we can shuffle them afterwords to provide the power role with fresh meat to scan.

nl=no lynch we have already voting patterns from d1 but we don't have a killed townie based on those voting patterns. and since the main reason for voting crazy of was inactivity, the leads aren't good really. but, i'm open to suggestion. anyone have a better idea?? btw, weren't there supposed to be some clues in the rooms??

well, the power roles must know something. guess this one is follow the cop. i say nl.

nvm, i see it wasn't edited out...

what was the old rule anyway??

well, that's everyone... can we get d2 on with it??

Move: Room 1 waw.... we all went in together

it will no be a huge break tomorrow, but it may prove to be one in the days after this. though now that i said this too, ignore my suggestion altogether.

i'd have liked if Martino wouldn't have brought it up actually. it would have made a better case to lynch the opposite player of the one the player that got killed suspected. now though since the variants have been outed out, it's pretty useless.

i'm not angry at you... just a bit frustrated cause of some personal reasons... guess it spills out in all the stuff i do...

well, to continue, i'm mostly saying this cause i feel you played on the omgus card too much. and quite frankly i had enough of it. i wanted to say something more but i forgot... oh well...

i'll continue later. gotta go to a friends memorial.

why is it that you feel like you are the victim?? i mean, the way i could see it, you tried to profit from the people not liking one of my suggestions and start a bandwaggon vote on me, then you didn't even bother to read properly who i voted for and accused me of omgus and again played victim and now that i say that if i think i'd die i think you have more chances than SJ to be scum you again revert back to playing victim invoking that it's all retaliation for your vote on me. but... it's more the playing victim part and the part where you changed votes between people too fast.

do you really think that people would get lynched just because they were suspected by the one who died?? last time i checked usually there are discussions, countediscussions, foses, wifoms etc etc. and out of the 2 of my room mates, firkked seems to have more of a agenda than SJ.

i'd suspect firkked over SJ.

oh, me just gots me a idea. now that we all know where e will spend the night, post your suspicion about the people who you will spend it with. who do you think is scum if you died?? after this, i'm pretty much ready to end the day.

i'm reversing the reversed part of the reversed reversed reversed psychology and using it on reversed situation by reversing the already reversed reversed psychology. and if you understood what i just said, you my friend have a more chaotic nature than me anyway, jokes aside, i find adding a bandwaggon vote on someone and trying to pass it as ok just because you're not hammering could be scummy.

well, let me elaborate on that one better... it seemed to me like he was seeking the towns approval with his arguments. the message i understood is that it's ok for him to vote on crazy since he is inactive and since he isn't the one who is hammering.