142 replies to this topic

[KevinH]

Post count:

KevinH 5
junkahoolik 4
Falzis 2
Narsis 2
CanucksDynasty 1
ScoutX 1
AKCPLUTO 1
Aquinas 0

Vote: Aquinas

[AKCPLUTO]

Ah, is that the inactivity theory in action, Kevin? Lawl.

[junkahoolik]

hmm... was that a bandwaggon vote??

[AKCPLUTO]

Yeah, I am following the crowd for now.

[CanucksDynasty]

Vote: Falzis

Not sure why you want to be following KevinH.
Sounds like you want to be buddy buddy to a townie.

[KevinH]

Ah, is that the inactivity theory in action, Kevin? Lawl.

Exactly.

Nobody really knows who is scum so we might as well keep the active players around for later in the game.

[Falzis]

Vote: Falzis

Not sure why you want to be following KevinH.
Sounds like you want to be buddy buddy to a townie.

Not really. I agree with his post about false dichotomies.

[Narsis]

ok tell me when in the past has Kevin been a townie were he has straight up said i will not no lynch without first going no lynch?

yes i agree that maybe he changed his gameplay style(and man i would so love it if he did). why do you think i didnt vote him? i just find it very odd that he is straight up going for a lynch without the whole no lynch stance.

on a side note it is somewhat refreshing to more or less completely skip the RVS.

[junkahoolik]

Narsis does have a point. i mean, if kevin did 2-3-4 posts before conceding to a lynch vote it would be something. but he did it after the first vote. to me it looks like he was just searching for a reason to lynch and he jumped on it fairly quickly. however, why did pluto bandwaggon after falzis's vote??

[Falzis]

Well, EM also in another game immediately said he will be changing his style and he drew fire for it and he was proven town. I'm open to people changing gameplays immediately. It's not as if KevinH hasn't had a lot of games before to think it over and not push through with his no lynch crusade.

Though I do concede that the possibilities you raise Narsis are possible (he's cop or mafia), I just don't like how you presented it as the only possibilities.

[KevinH]

Let me correct myself.

If a no-lynch band-wagon gets started, I will happily join it.

However, playing with the same players as in most of the previous games, I feel the chance of a no-lynch is almost nil.

An analysis would be interesting to see if those that most vocally oppose the no-lynch ultimately are proven scum.

[KevinH]

since in all games i've played, kevin gets wagoned for the no-lynch stance he takes, i'm going pre-emptive on his arse since it seems the trend

i mean, if kevin did 2-3-4 posts before conceding to a lynch vote it would be something. but he did it after the first vote. to me it looks like he was just searching for a reason to lynch and he jumped on it fairly quickly.

Let me summarize:

• junkahoolik wants to pre-emptively prevent me from arguing for a no-lynch
• junkahoolik thinks I should have posted 2-3-4 times before abandoning the no-lynch strategy

I find this suspicious.

[AKCPLUTO]

Narsis does have a point. i mean, if kevin did 2-3-4 posts before conceding to a lynch vote it would be something. but he did it after the first vote. to me it looks like he was just searching for a reason to lynch and he jumped on it fairly quickly. however, why did pluto bandwaggon after falzis's vote??

(@ Narsis, we were sorta discussing this today)...Junk, well, I am aware of the pusedo-gaming entires in MafiaScum's wiki (Main Page - MafiaWiki), but the bandwagon vote is cuz like a) I do not know better...I just picked the same guy for no reason at all I trust Falzis c) This is my way of tipping my cap for that game that just finished. Yeah, I'm not sure about the ethics here, but I take it that "reasons" b-c with regard to that other game are frowned upon? Am I going to get banned for it?

Either way, rest assured that I am a townie. After all, why would I lie?

[Falzis]

Ugh, because you could be scum?

[junkahoolik]

Let me summarize:

• junkahoolik wants to pre-emptively prevent me from arguing for a no-lynch
• junkahoolik thinks I should have posted 2-3-4 times before abandoning the no-lynch strategy

I find this suspicious.

your first point is off. i went ahead of the whole rvs after which everyone argues about your no-lynch strategy and voted for you. so i just pre-emptively voted for you. i can't prevent you pre-emotively for arguing for anything really. and yes, i think you dropped your normal no-lynch stance far too quickly this game.

[junkahoolik]

Well, EM also in another game immediately said he will be changing his style and he drew fire for it and he was proven town. I'm open to people changing gameplays immediately. It's not as if KevinH hasn't had a lot of games before to think it over and not push through with his no lynch crusade.

Though I do concede that the possibilities you raise Narsis are possible (he's cop or mafia), I just don't like how you presented it as the only possibilities.

not quite. EM said so before the game even started. and he got lynched because of the fact that he was spotted by the oracle of that game (SJ i think) while doing the NK, not because he got heat from altering his usual game play style (there was a bit of that but it was minimal really, and it was noted mostly because he pointed it out before imo).

[junkahoolik]

Ugh, because you could be scum?

true that. i mean, scum wouldn't say they are scum now, would they?? however, i think ack is townie for now. not sure for Falzis though...

[junkahoolik]

am i ahead of everyone else in posts now mommy??

[CanucksDynasty]

Well today is deadline day.
So it's time to make your vote/voice be heard.

I'm keeping my vote on Falzis.

[CanucksDynasty]

Unofficial Vote Count...

SinKon (1) - ScoutX
KevinH (1) - junkahoolik
Narsis (2) - Falzis, AKCPLUTO
Falzis (1) - CanucksDynasty
Aquinas (1) - KevinH

Not Voting (2) - Narsis, Aquinas

@anyone - can someone update the google spreadsheet? My firewall is preventing me from using it.

@ScoutX - you might want to change your vote since it seems the MOD has decided your vote for SinKon was not in jest.