315 replies to this topic

[Falzis]

Thanks!!
I can feel the love.

You're welcome

[Nerau]

Huh?



So why the unvote?

i was saying i wasn't trying to push an early lynch

[Aquinas]

Vote: Theophilos

He is probably a repeat offender.

[Narsis]

Vote: CanucksDynasty

FoS: Falzis

at least give a reason for your "random" vote.

[molestargazer]

VOTE COUNT
Kaziocore (2): CanucksDynasty, AKCPLUTO
AKCPLUTO (1): Kaziocore
Falzis (1): Theophilos
CanucksDynasty (1): Falzis
Theophilos (1): Aquinas

Not Voting (3): Nerau, Windblade, Narsis

With 9 Alive, 5 is needed to lynch.

[CanucksDynasty]

Vote: Theophilos

He is probably a repeat offender.

Funny.
I thought of this too after he placed that 2nd vote on Falzis.

[CanucksDynasty]

i was saying i wasn't trying to push an early lynch

He was only at 2 votes.
It's 5 needed for the lynch.
I highly doubt that 3 more votes would have suddenly been placed in the next few days.

FOS: Nerau

[Narsis]

He was only at 2 votes.
It's 5 needed for the lynch.
I highly doubt that 3 more votes would have suddenly been placed in the next few days.

FOS: Nerau

so then why'd you say this:

Yikes!!
Day 1 and we already have 2 people with 2 votes.


Unofficial Vote Count

Falzis (2) - Nerau, Theophilos
Kaziocore (2) - CanucksDynasty, AKCPLUTO
AKCPLUTO (1) - Kaziocore

Not voting (4) - Windblade, Falzis, Narsis, Aquinas

?

[CanucksDynasty]

so then why'd you say this:

?

Partly to be humerous.
Partly to gauge reactions of some.

[Windblade]

Well, isn't it surprising that so many people vote so quickly? I certainly was. I wouldn't search much behind this. Unless I'm missing something.

[Narsis]

Well, isn't it surprising that so many people vote so quickly? I certainly was. I wouldn't search much behind this. Unless I'm missing something.

so you are telling me not to question CD's motives?

[Windblade]

Nah, not saying that. Saying not to search to much behind it. Hey, just like my post.

I find that he comments that so many people voted so soon not very strange and I don't think he meant anything sinister. If he was I'm to stupid to notice.

Also generally speaking. Just noticed those FoS's. I thought it was supposed to be pretty serious if you FoS someone, how come you guys are already FoSing people only after a few posts?

[CanucksDynasty]

Nah, not saying that. Saying not to search to much behind it. Hey, just like my post.

I find that he comments that so many people voted so soon not very strange and I don't think he meant anything sinister. If he was I'm to stupid to notice.

Also generally speaking. Just noticed those FoS's. I thought it was supposed to be pretty serious if you FoS someone, how come you guys are already FoSing people only after a few posts?

FOS generally means "I got my eye on you".
SFOS (Serious FOS) usually means "I'm 99% positive you're scum".

Meh...at least that's what it means to me.

And I find it better if more people were into scum-hunting.
Rather than posting little (which I equate to having less chance of a scum slip-up).

[Narsis]

Nah, not saying that. Saying not to search to much behind it. Hey, just like my post.

I find that he comments that so many people voted so soon not very strange and I don't think he meant anything sinister. If he was I'm to stupid to notice.

Also generally speaking. Just noticed those FoS's. I thought it was supposed to be pretty serious if you FoS someone, how come you guys are already FoSing people only after a few posts?

why don't you want me to search much behind it?

[AKCPLUTO]

SFOS: CanucksDynasty.

[Kaziocore]

SFOS: CanucksDynasty.

What's the reason for this?

[Windblade]

why don't you want me to search much behind it?

What don't you understand from my post? I seriously have no idea what you're trying to say that post has already explained my reasoning to not search much behind it.

I find that he comments that so many people voted so soon not very strange and I don't think he meant anything sinister. If he was I'm to stupid to notice.

I'll try to explain further.


I find his reasoning in this post not really strange.

QUOTE (CanucksDynasty @ Apr 8 2010, 10:19 AM) *
He was only at 2 votes.
It's 5 needed for the lynch.
I highly doubt that 3 more votes would have suddenly been placed in the next few days.

FOS: Nerau

Don't think that this is stupid reasoning. And I honestly don't see much connection between his earlier post and this one. Seems you're thinking of something. Those posts don't seem much related to me.

One is comment about how fast ppl voted.

Other is comment that another 3 votes on a person isn't very likely so soon.


Argg, have to go to school. Will add more to this when I get back.

[CanucksDynasty]

SFOS: CanucksDynasty.

Hmm...I'd like to know why you have the SFOS on me but still retain your vote on Kaziocore.

[Narsis]

What don't you understand from my post? I seriously have no idea what you're trying to say that post has already explained my reasoning to not search much behind it.



I'll try to explain further.


I find his reasoning in this post not really strange.



Don't think that this is stupid reasoning. And I honestly don't see much connection between his earlier post and this one. Seems you're thinking of something. Those posts don't seem much related to me.

One is comment about how fast ppl voted.

Other is comment that another 3 votes on a person isn't very likely so soon.


Argg, have to go to school. Will add more to this when I get back.

it's inconsistent. one post he seems very surprised that votes have come that quickly and seems to say it in a way that he wants people to settle down and stop voting. then he says that 3 votes isn't likely to come soon so no need to worry about all the quick voting. it just seems inconsistent to me. that followed by your quick and previously ambiguous defense of CD has me suspicious.

[Falzis]

No reason is just as good as a random reason.

(BTW, I will be back in 2 to 3 days I'm busy with a tournament - though I try to read this thread everyday as much as possible I just can't post much yet)