FightingOkra replaces MindTaker and BeeBs replaces Stargazer Alchemist.

 

Do we want an extension or not?

 

VOTE COUNT

BeeBs (2): D3mon, ccabal86

Tracker (1): Nerau

Kevin H (1): CanucksDynasty

FightingOkra (1): Kaziocore

CanucksDynasty (1): Angel Cruz dela Sant

 

No Lynch (2): KevinH, Tracker

 

Not Voting (3): FightingOkra, BeeBs, Preston

 

With 11 Alive, 6 is needed to lynch.

hm.. I think the deadline should be extended...

 

Unvote

Yeah, I think we should extend the deadline a few days, at least until the new guys post.

 

Unvote

Hello everyone. new guy here. I will try to read everything that has been posted so far and make a comment soon. Long live the Townies!

Not alot has been said compared to the last game read. One question I had is why do some people like no-lynch over lynching on the 1st day.

I don't want an extension. This game is slow enough as it is.

 

The reason I don't think it is wise to lynch is that the odds are very much against hitting a scum.

 

With 11 players there would typically be 3 scum. So a random lynch would get a townie 8/11 of the time.

 

To further skew the odds, consider that the scum know who they are so they can avoid voting for another scum.

 

And on top of it all, consider that there are some townie power roles floating around that we need to win. It's not worth the 3/11 chance of of trying to get a scum when there's at least a 3/11 chance of killing off a cop, doc, or other power role.

 

Having the deadline pass without enough votes for a lynch is just as good as a majority voting for no-lynch. Bring on the night!

An extension isn't bringing anything new.

I prefer to have an extension.

We have the replacements that we need,

let them first join in the discussion.

Well i have no clue on who could be Mafia. All i've seen are people making, what i think are, their usual day 1 claims or just random accusing with no evidence. What do we need to get the ball rolling?

Well i have no clue on who could be Mafia. All i've seen are people making, what i think are, their usual day 1 claims or just random accusing with no evidence. What do we need to get the ball rolling?

 

Well what do you expect?

 

I think every day one is like that

where everyone tries to lynch someone

for the craziest and dumbest of reasons.

 

The only thing we get here is information

(how each person reacted, voted, and

posted that led to the lynching; scum

can slip-up while they post as it's

normally hard to lie or hide things)

and the chance to lynch a scum.

 

At least we have some quite of progress and

we don't start from zero the next day.

 

And we can't always rely on the cops or

any other role as they can be killed by the mafia.

 

That's why on D1 of games, I prefer to lynch an

inactive player than choose not to lynch as

inactive players can destroy the game especially

if they're still alive during the later days.

Well i have no clue on who could be Mafia. All i've seen are people making, what i think are, their usual day 1 claims or just random accusing with no evidence. What do we need to get the ball rolling?

 

Well.. accusing someone of being scum usually gets the ball rolling.

 

KevinH, why are you against the extension?

 

Are you impatient to get the night kill ??

or just happy to see that town has kinda agreed on No-lynch?

After leading the lynch on the cop (security guard) in the last game...I'm starting to rethink my lynch on D1 policy. That lynch was a huge blow against the town.

 

We have 11 players with presumably 3 mafia.

 

If we did 2 consecutive no lynch, we would have 3 nights to gather info and 1 chance to get mafia before LYLO (worst case scenario and assuming only 1 nightkill).

 

D1 No Lynch - 8/3

N1 mafia kill - 7/3

D2 No Lynch - 7/3

N2 mafia kill - 6/3

D3 Lynch - 5/3

N3 mafia kill - 4/3

D4 LYLO

 

If we lynched on D1...we get 2 chances to lynch mafia and 2 nights to gather info.

 

D1 Lynch - 7/3

N1 mafia kill - 6/3

D2 Lynch - 5/3

N2 mafia kill - 4/3

D3 LYLO

 

Hmmmm

Well then, I think Angel is Mafia. Reason: Gut feeling! will wait for his response to make a decision.

After leading the lynch on the cop (security guard) in the last game...I'm starting to rethink my lynch on D1 policy. That lynch was a huge blow against the town.

 

We have 11 players with presumably 3 mafia.

 

If we did 2 consecutive no lynch, we would have 3 nights to gather info and 1 chance to get mafia before LYLO (worst case scenario and assuming only 1 nightkill).

 

D1 No Lynch - 8/3

N1 mafia kill - 7/3

D2 No Lynch - 7/3

N2 mafia kill - 6/3

D3 Lynch - 5/3

N3 mafia kill - 4/3

D4 LYLO

 

If we lynched on D1...we get 2 chances to lynch mafia and 2 nights to gather info.

 

D1 Lynch - 7/3

N1 mafia kill - 6/3

D2 Lynch - 5/3

N2 mafia kill - 4/3

D3 LYLO

 

Hmmmm

 

So that means you think we should no-lynch? I don't think a mafia player would recomend a no-lynch.

Undecided at this point.

 

I think if everyone votes between 2 lynch candidates...then voting patterns can be established. If not everyone votes...then the importance of voting patterns are lessened.

 

Seeing the inactivity that generally is associated with D1...I'm leaning towards a no-lynch.

BTW I will be away on vacation between July 12th - 17th with limited access to the internet.

After leading the lynch on the cop (security guard) in the last game...I'm starting to rethink my lynch on D1 policy. That lynch was a huge blow against the town.

 

We have 11 players with presumably 3 mafia.

 

If we did 2 consecutive no lynch, we would have 3 nights to gather info and 1 chance to get mafia before LYLO (worst case scenario and assuming only 1 nightkill).

 

D1 No Lynch - 8/3

N1 mafia kill - 7/3

D2 No Lynch - 7/3

N2 mafia kill - 6/3

D3 Lynch - 5/3

N3 mafia kill - 4/3

D4 LYLO

 

If we lynched on D1...we get 2 chances to lynch mafia and 2 nights to gather info.

 

D1 Lynch - 7/3

N1 mafia kill - 6/3

D2 Lynch - 5/3

N2 mafia kill - 4/3

D3 LYLO

 

Hmmmm

 

CD advocating no-lynch..

I am not against it but I am a little surprised.

 

*adds CD to the list of suspects*

Why would you suspect him for thinking about a no-lynch?

Why would you suspect him for thinking about a no-lynch?

 

Because generally I have been in favour of lynching on D1. So it is out of character for me to advocate a no lynch. So a deviation from the norm should make people wary of me.

 

But I would say...

If every is compelled to vote...I would be for a lynch. If everyone has votes strewn about...maybe a no lynch may be the best course of action.

Well I haven't seen any reasons to suspect anyone at this point.

 

Vote: No Lynch

Forgot to explain my reason. I would rather not vote wrong and would also rather get this thing moving. I will change my vote if something changes.

Why would you suspect him for thinking about a no-lynch?

 

Well.. he has always been a "lynch on the first day benefits town guy".

In the last round he led the bandwagon against someone claiming to be a security guard (on the first day), because "no-lynch" is not good for the town. Now, he might be trying to ensure that the same mistake is not repeated. But, this is not what he usually does and I find it a little suspicious.

Well.. he has always been a "lynch on the first day benefits town guy".

In the last round he led the bandwagon against someone claiming to be a security guard (on the first day), because "no-lynch" is not good for the town. Now, he might be trying to ensure that the same mistake is not repeated. But, this is not what he usually does and I find it a little suspicious.

Yeah...it's called learning from your mistakes.

Well, things are a bit different now than it was last game. In TMCWPTI #2 the day 1 linchee was an active player, and here we're talking about lynching an inactive (btw, how many are left?). Inactives hurt town simply by existing. Mafia can plan their tactics with the inactives in mind (like we did last game).

I would like you all to know that BeeBs deleted. Just letting y'all know.