The Force Awakens
 
Only the following roles may exist in this game:

Vanilla Townie, Bodyguard, Commuter, Sane Cop, Rolecop, Vanilla Cop, Flavor Cop, Doctor, Friendly Neighbor, Follower, Gunsmith, Innocent Child, Jack of All Trades, Jailkeeper, Mafia Goon, Mafia Encryptor, Mafia Godfather, Mafia Ninja, Mafia Strongman, Mafia Traitor, Mason, Miller, Motion Detector, Neapolitan, Neighbor, Neighborizer, Roleblocker, Rolestopper, Serial Killer, Tracker, Universal Backup, Vigilante, Voyeur, Watcher

The following modifiers may also exist in this game:

Ascetic, Backup (with or without primary role present), Bulletproof, Enabler (with or without primary role present), Even/Odd Night, Macho, Neighbor, Non-Consecutive Night, Weak, X-Shot

 
Character names have been assigned such that townies have good-guy names from the Star Wars universe and scum have bad-guy names. Roles do not correlate with the Star Wars names (Yoda would not necessarily be the most powerful).
 

You are Snap Wexley, a Vanilla Townie. Your power is in your vote. You win when the Town controls the game.

 
Players:

Commander Shepard Finster Baby
Electric Mango
Fox Fire
Imran Ehsan
iSocialism
Kaziocore Shahenshah
Lyner
Mandarijn
Perez
Rafay
Road2Victory ccabal86
Robert2424
Rusken
Samus
The Warrior
Yehom

• During the Day phase, each player may speak and vote inthread.
• If a player receives the majority of the available votes during the Day, they are lynched.
• At deadline, a player with half-majority will be lynched.
• You may vote No Lynch.
• After the Day, the game goes to Night.
• The game thread is closed during the Night. The Mafia may speak to each other at Night.
• All Active Roles may submit actions via PM at Night.
• The Mafia can, as a faction, kill one player at Night.
• After the Night, the game goes to Day.
• All dead players (lynched or killed) can no longer participate in the game.
• Basic rules for maintaining the integrity of the game thread are in effect (i.e. players may not quote their Role PMs, nor may they discuss the game outside the game thread unless otherwise permitted, etc.)
• The game is won when only one faction remains in the game, or nothing can prevent the same.
• Mass role-claiming is not allowed, but you may reveal your role if you have something interesting to share.

Game Days will last as many real-life days as there are players alive.
Game Nights will last 48 hours but will include at least one weekday.
 
Fox Fire, Poe Dameron, Ascetic Sane Cop, lynched Day 1
Rusken, Leia Organa, Motion Detector, lynched Day 2
Samus,, Chewbacca, Vanilla Townie Universal Backup who became Ascetic Sane Cop, killed Night 2.
Rafay, R2-D2, 3-shot (ascetic-proof) Rolestopper lynched Day 3
Mandarijn, Admiral Ackbar, Macho Flavor Cop, killed Night 3.
Robert2424, BB-8, Odd Night Tracker, killed Night 3.
Perez, Maz Kanata, Voyeur, lynched Day 4.
Ccabal86, Luke Skywalker, Non-Consecutive Night Watcher, lynched Day 5.
Yehom, Ello Asty, Bodyguard, killed Night 5.

If you're worried about one vote against you then you have something to hide. If you have to attack another player, and try to figure how he's scum because he voted for you then you are worried about something. My vote was to get you to talk, because you were/are the highest person on my list within the wagon. outside the wagon I don't have a clue. I got you to talk, and it was a heavy defense about one vote. Your vote is base off my vote for you. My vote, however is based on "weak" "poor" "something else ad hominine" reasoning.

 

My vote was to get you to talk, because you were/are the highest person on my list within the wagon.

 

And you still have zero explanation as to why I am the 'highest person' on your list.

 

And if you wanted me to talk, you should have just asked, not voted for me. It screams scum and you know it. C'mon, even I'm new and can see that.

 

Plus also, I hate unjustified attacks. You've basically secured the fact that you have zero reason to have voted for me, while giving me every reason to vote for you. I think it's because you're constantly trying to deflect it back to me, while giving the same answer.

you don't necessarily need a reason for someone to be your highest suspect tbh

If you're worried about one vote against you then you have something to hide. If you have to attack another player, and try to figure how he's scum because he voted for you then you are worried about something. My vote was to get you to talk, because you were/are the highest person on my list within the wagon. outside the wagon I don't have a clue. I got you to talk, and it was a heavy defense about one vote. Your vote is base off my vote for you. My vote, however is based on "weak" "poor" "something else ad hominine" reasoning.

so basically you would vote on anybody who didnt talk? I would understand the votes on Kazio and Lyner but on Rusken I don't think so. He posts like at least once or twice per day. 

 

Also nice way to use your vocabulary btw, LOL

 

then who do you think is scummy besides the inactives?

Hey, to prove no harm, no foul, if iSoc wants to vote an inactive, then I will gladly unvote him and vote for the inactive as well. That way it will give us time to figure out who is scum and who is not.

I doubt that either iSoc and Rusken are townies. Rusken was on the lynch wagon for FF but as I have pointed out before I feel that was a pro-town lynch. On the other hand iSoc has been pretty active and has given his reasons for why he thinks Rusken may be scummy. So to me it feels like two townies bickering against one another while the real scum hold back and lurk around.

 

However, I pushed for a lynch of the inactive on D1 and as a result ended up in the short-list for scum category. It seems like some ppl still feel that inactives and lurkers should not be lynched with extreme prejudice. So I am wait and see who the rest of the players thinks deserves to be lynched as there are no info from last night coming to light. If I had my way I would lynch the most inactive player on D2 as well but I am not gonna push for it unless others agree with my views as well.

edit: oops..i meant I doubt that either iSoc and Rusken are townies scum.

I would be down to unvote my vote on Isoc to vote inactives too. 

To me the the discussion between ISocialism and Rusken feels like the trappings of two townies going at it while the scum sits back and let's the town do their work for them. It is usually how these games begin. In my experience I have found that most scum play safe and quiet then pounce at the end game. It is the safest move and many Mafia players tend to be less active when they are Mafia. They already know the answers and become bored with the game and this their play style can be a tell.

 

My strategy is to lynch the inactives early as they are more likely to be scum and at worst are dead weight.

An active townie is a good townie. After a couple a couple days of voting patterns to analyze along with the daily conversations we will be able to make reliable lunches against the scum.

 

My vote will go for the most inactive person as the day draws near.

To me the the discussion between ISocialism and Rusken feels like the trappings of two townies going at it while the scum sits back and let's the town do their work for them. It is usually how these games begin. In my experience I have found that most scum play safe and quiet then pounce at the end game. It is the safest move and many Mafia players tend to be less active when they are Mafia. They already know the answers and become bored with the game and this their play style can be a tell.

 

My strategy is to lynch the inactives early as they are more likely to be scum and at worst are dead weight.

An active townie is a good townie. After a couple a couple days of voting patterns to analyze along with the daily conversations we will be able to make reliable lunches against the scum.

 

My vote will go for the most inactive person as the day draws near.

Well said thats what I was thinking

And like I've said, I'd rather vote for an inactive than iSoc, but he voted for me, gave some BS reasoning, and blam. Instant back and forth. Just add water.

 

In light of this, and my agreement with the others, lynching inactives (as I have stated quite a few times both during and prior to this) is more appropriate.

 

I will still keep my eye on iSoc, as I don't trust him, but I think for now, a truce would be more appropriate until we can nix out the inactives/lurkers. Agreed?

 

Unvote

Vote: Rafay

I will vote for the inactive too. 

 

Unvote

 

Vote: Kazio 

 

He seems to be the person that hasn't responded in days= inactive = possible scum 

Q: What do you call a Sith who won't fight?
A: A Sithy.


Vote Count

Electric Mango (2): Kaziocore, Perez,
iSocialism (1): Finster Baby,
Perez (1): Electric Mango,
The Warrior (1): Samus,
Lyner (1): Robert2424, 
Rafay (1): Rusken,
Kaziocore (1): Road2Victory,
Rusken (0): 
Mandarijn (0):
Finster Baby (0):
Imran Ehsan (0):
Yehom (0):
Robert2424 (0):
Samus (0):
Road2Victory (0):

No Lynch (0):

Not voting: Mandarijn, Imran Ehsan, The Warrior, Yehom, Lyner, Rafay, iSocialism,

 
With 15 alive, it takes 8 to lynch or 4 at deadline.
Deadline is Saturday, February 6, at 18:00 EST.

Wait, didn't someone say that Lyner is good at playing mafia? That would mean that he knows that being inactive = scum. Would it make more sense to knock out the inactive lurker?

Kazio actually hasn't been on the forum since the 25th.

 

All the others are just lurking, so I think I rather want to lynch a lurker than an inactive...

 

 

Wait, didn't someone say that Lyner is good at playing mafia? That would mean that he knows that being inactive = scum.

 

Lyner isn't usually inactive. He's a very active player; both as scum and town. Kaz is active too in games but strangely not in this one..... 

Hmm... hey KevinH? Can we get a current post count of the players please?

Rusken 55

KevinH 49

Robert2424 48

Road2Victory 46

Samus 36

iSocialism 27

Mandarijn 24

Imran Ehsan 23

The Warrior 19

Finster Baby 19

Electric Mango 17

Rafay 13

Perez 13

Yehom 10

Lyner 8

Kaziocore 7

Fox Fire 1

Commander Shepard 1

Based off of Sammys post count numbers I will be voting for Lyner or Kaz with Lyner being the front runner. Lurking is worse than inactivity and Lyner is always scum anyway.

Holy shot, CS is viewing the thread.

Lyner is normally an active player, but also has a low posting count. However, he can't be trusted.

Lyner

tbh I don't think Lyner is scum.

 

My predictions are The Warrior, R2V & Kaz so far, I suspect there are two more but can't quite decide yet who

I'm also going to vote for my main suspect at this moment. We'll see what happens.

 

Vote The Warrior

Now that iSoc has satisfied my reasoning for initially voting for him....

 

UNVOTE: iSocialism

 

VOTE: The Warrior

 

He's been suspicious to me for a while, plus he's a good player, able to pass himself off as anything he wants. Pretty scummy, IMO.

Now that iSoc has satisfied my reasoning for initially voting for him....

 

UNVOTE: iSocialism

 

VOTE: The Warrior

 

He's been suspicious to me for a while, plus he's a good player, able to pass himself off as anything he wants. Pretty scummy, IMO.

and what might that be?

Interesting flurry of votes on the TW. Kinda like what we saw on the iSocialism wagon. Such quick  changes of stance on the lynch target gets my spidy senses tingling....and not in a good way.

 

Can you guys explain the reason for the TW vote instead of just..."he looks scummy!"

The reasoning for TW was already explained on pages 14-16 I think, I got this quote from Samus and I tend to agree with him:

TW seems the most scummy tbh, that timeline of events he posted seems more like a push to pose Robert as scum and get a wagon on him again.

 

Also bare in mind this is his first game of Mafia, he seems to be trying too hard to prove to be the innocent townie bystander, while actively pushing for people to be lynched.

 

First CS for his inactivity, then being part of suspected scum who lynched FF & now his persistent accusations towards Robert. Nobody in this game has flip flopped so much.

 

I see right through you scum.

 

Vote: The Warrior.

 

Also Imran, I greatly agree that D1 lynches are necessary, never thought about it like that before. But we atleast have some form of information now.