I read this earlier this morning and found it fairly interesting:
I'll be honest, it's not because ANTIFA/Black Bloc members decided attacked two journalists. I've been expecting that for some time, the only question was which group would be the first to do it.
This is what I found interesting;
"Sometimes, it is necessary to go against what the mainstream considers ‘acceptable,’ to break the law in order to do the ethical thing,” the
post read. “Those who mask up to fight the racist far-right have decided, at great personal risk, that they will use any means necessary
to shut down fascist organizing.”
Interesting, eh?
The "alt-right" (a term I despise), labels the mainstream media "fake news" (implying they are liars), leftist/liberal elites, among other terms. They scream about a "left wing media bias", and they support a "socialist agenda"
Meanwhile the "alt-left" (another term I despise), calls them a bunch of fascists and by implication a bunch of racists. They scream about the media having a corporate agenda supporting a capitalist world view.
Think for a minute. What does this say about the mainstream media?
They can't be both fascist and socialist at the same time.
They can't push a capitalist and a communist agenda at the same time.