I cannot help but feel that people are voting with their emotions and friendships and ignoring facts.
Fact: I repeatedly lynched Wolfpacks, who was scum.
Fact: I played no part in lynching MK, who was townie. While Brewers played a big part in lynching a townie
.Fact: Robert was night killed after I pushed hard to lynch him. He had not fingered me. He had done nothing to me.
- inference: scum would never pursue someone so relentlessly for no reason, it makes the pursuer very conspicuous.
- inference: scum would not night kill someone they were trying to frame as scum, it ruins the entire concept of making an innocent person look guilty.
Fact: I role claimed insane cop, pointing to my investigations of Brewsky, Robert, and Medved. I explained why I investigated each of them and my results were that Brewsky was not guilty, Robert and Medved were guilty. I explained I must be insane because Robert, who I aggressively tried to lynch believing my results were true, was town. During this time I contradicted myself calling Medved guilty.
.Unproven Fact: I misspoke because I got confused by the double negatives and all the excitement I was experiencing at being a cop for the first time.
Fact: Brewers latched on to my mistake and says this proves I’m scum, even though the only thing it proves is that I was confused.
Fact: Brewers biggest defense is that TW would never set up a game with a VANILLA cop, an INSANE cop, and a LYNCHPROOF, SCUM cop. But he has no way of knowing how the game was set up, so he is just throwing out the only possible defense he can imagine against my role claim.
Fact: Brewers says that I must be scum because I initially believed MK. This is quite IRONic given he posted this:
So out of all the options, I think x-shot is the most likely. Probably just a 1 shot, but then again, maybe not. I also agree with rafay, if WP was lynch proof, he probably would have been told in his role PM. Meaning WP was clearly hiding that to make us waste the day with a lynch on him. He really didnt try very hard to defend himself-I mean If i was scum and knew that lynching me would be pointless, then I wouldnt try too hard to defend myself either. And I am sure his partners know exactly what kind of lynch proof he is.
Which brings me to the vote by MK. If WP is a 1 shot lynchproof, would MK be trying to lead a wagon on him today if they are partners? I doubt it.
One crazy idea that i dont think is likely but hey, you never know- Kverst and WP are both scum. Kverst knew WP was lynchproof, so he outed the scum who made the kill in order to become "confirmed town" while at the same time he knew WP would survive. I would give this a 1% chance of being true.
Fact: Based on Brewsky logic, Brewsky must be scum because he trusted MK.
Fact: Brewers is an insanely good Mafia Player, who lies very convincingly (see past games for evidence).
Fact: Brewers successfully pushed to lynch a townie and played no part in lynching scum (Wolfpacks)
Fact: I voted to lynch scum both times and hammered scum once.
Fact: Brewers has been trying to control the game from the start, even using intimidation:
yeah, no one vote for him any more please. we do not want to end the day so quick.
FoS on anyone if they cast the hammer... lets slow down. we still have like 6 days left to discuss stuff.
for all we know, we have a real cop out there or maybe a role cop or something that found another scum! so lets just slow our roll a bit
Later I said
I think it is very interesting that Brewsky wants to control this game, but I’m bored with the wait.
VOTE WOLFPACKS
Fact: generally speaking when someone tries to control a Mafia game it is because they are scum,
If you follow the facts objectively, it is clear that I am being truthful and Brewsky is lying very skillfully.
Also, I would really appreciate it if people would share their thoughts on who they think is town vs. scum of all the living players. I will do so a bit later, as I’m exhausted from writing all this.
*edited to fix a typo