1469 replies to this topic

[CanucksDynasty]

Sorry...not correct format.

MOD: Anybody availabe to take Samus spot?

Not got anyone. I might end up sending a mass PM to all former participants, or see if Hades wants to jump in.

(Participants? I've been doing too much psychology work.)

Edited by molestargazer, 23 January 2010 - 06:35 PM.

[Narsis]

@Narsis - can you provide a bit more detail about your caffiene pills? You asked me...so I ask of you.

i think i covered pretty well in my last post but meh here goes:

the item is caffeine pills.

basically, i see anyone that moves into my room, out of my room, or in an adjacent room. unfortunately i dont know who it is that's moving.

[CanucksDynasty]

i think i covered pretty well in my last post but meh here goes:

the item is caffeine pills.

basically, i see anyone that moves into my room, out of my room, or in an adjacent room. unfortunately i dont know who it is that's moving.

Man...that's pretty useless.
Basically you know something is happening but you don't know who.

I'm not even quite sure how to effectively use that item.

[Electric Mango]

Man...that's pretty useless.
Basically you know something is happening but you don't know who.

I'm not even quite sure how to effectively use that item.

We would have to put 1 person in the room w/ Narsis and another in an adjacent room and he could keep tabs on them.

[CanucksDynasty]

Be advised that scum can still win if we are inactive this weekend (ie. like me).

All scum needs to do is place 3 votes on a townie to get a half-majority lynch before the end of the day.
8 people = 5 majority vote lynch = 3 half-majority lynch at deadline.

[CanucksDynasty]

I'm satisfied with Narsis answer for now.

Vote: Martino

[Narsis]

@ mole: votecount please?

[Electric Mango]

I believe we have two votes for no lynch. I would advise someone else voting the same soon. Kudos to CD for pointing this out.

[Narsis]

I believe we have two votes for no lynch. I would advise someone else voting the same soon. Kudos to CD for pointing this out.

pointing what out?

also i still dont get what we are gaining...our items arent powerful enough to tell us who is moving(except in Aquinas' case but that requires him to be specific about a particular person). so unless there are items/a pro-town powerrole around that we dont know about...we will gain nothing.

[Electric Mango]

pointing what out?

also i still dont get what we are gaining...our items arent powerful enough to tell us who is moving(except in Aquinas' case but that requires him to be specific about a particular person). so unless there are items/a pro-town powerrole around that we dont know about...we will gain nothing.

For pointing this out:

Be advised that scum can still win if we are inactive this weekend (ie. like me).

All scum needs to do is place 3 votes on a townie to get a half-majority lynch before the end of the day.
8 people = 5 majority vote lynch = 3 half-majority lynch at deadline.

[Falzis]

But you are a power role, right Narsis? Not just item powered?

[Aquinas]

If people are telling the truth about their items, we should devise a strategy already.

Narsis should be lumped in one room and Aquinas in the other. Aquinas will watch Narsis' room or Narsis and we could lump with Narsis the people we suspect are scum. Aquinas will have CD with him in the room so that in case Aquinas is targeted by scum (coz he has the monocles) CD will be there to shout and know who is in the room.

4 people in each room? What do you guys think?

Going to nap, read your thoughts later.

I think you might misunderstand my item. Watching Narsis would let me know if he acted in my room or a room adjacent. What would be the benefit of me going into a room with Narsis and then using the item on him? I would rather pick another target to watch and thus have to be very careful about my room placement probably not giving away to much upfront like your strategy suggests. Especially since many people have taken issue with the fact that scum may not all have to go to a room to kill someone. I would like to keep the person I will be targeting tonight anonymous. If the scum know who I am watching ahead of time they are going to have a much easier time of simply side stepping it.

[Falzis]

I said you and Narsis should be in separate or different rooms dude.

[Aquinas]

Whoops. I read Narsis should be lumped in a room WITH Aquinas. My bad. Anyway, the rest of what I was explaining still stands. Would you agree with that?

[Falzis]

Yup I do. I still think CD and you Aquinas should be in one room even though CD warned of the danger of being roleblocked and NKed in the same room, if there is a doctor or a medkit which is reasonable to assume, then we can still get the results from the other room such as movements or what not.

[Martino]

A no lynch is okay with me. I'm not sure we'll gain much information but it won't harm our chances.
unvote
vote no lynch

Be advised that scum can still win if we are inactive this weekend (ie. like me).

All scum needs to do is place 3 votes on a townie to get a half-majority lynch before the end of the day.
8 people = 5 majority vote lynch = 3 half-majority lynch at deadline.

I'm satisfied with Narsis answer for now.

Vote: Martino

These were consecutive posts. First he warns us that the scum may come in and quickly get a townie to half a majority close to deadline. Next he completely ignores his own advice and votes for me. I know he is always inactive during the weekend, but he could have easily prevented the scum from ganging up on a townie by voting no lynch. Instead, he votes for me. If I had been scum, that vote would be useless. The majority of the players seem to have agreed on a no lynch, so the only players that will be quickly changing their vote to get someone lynched are the mafia. So if I had been scum, his vote would not prevent a townie from being quicklynched by mafia. However, I am not scum, so his vote opens me up to being quicklynched. I wouldn't even be surprised if the first post was not so much a warning for the town, but more a reminder to his scumbuddies to vote for me if the no lynch option did not have three votes when we are close to the deadline.

[molestargazer]

The super-amazing catch-up VOTE COUNT
Martino (2): Narsis, CanucksDynasty

No Lynch (3): Falzis, Electric Mango, Martino

Not Voting (3): Samus, SinKon, Aquinas

With 8 alive, 5 is needed to lynch.
Deadline is Jan 25th.

Aquinas - Please bold your messages to mod. I missed this one. You can bring up whatever you like as lonh as it doesn't break any rules.

[CanucksDynasty]

A no lynch is okay with me. I'm not sure we'll gain much information but it won't harm our chances.
unvote
vote no lynch




These were consecutive posts. First he warns us that the scum may come in and quickly get a townie to half a majority close to deadline. Next he completely ignores his own advice and votes for me. I know he is always inactive during the weekend, but he could have easily prevented the scum from ganging up on a townie by voting no lynch. Instead, he votes for me. If I had been scum, that vote would be useless. The majority of the players seem to have agreed on a no lynch, so the only players that will be quickly changing their vote to get someone lynched are the mafia. So if I had been scum, his vote would not prevent a townie from being quicklynched by mafia. However, I am not scum, so his vote opens me up to being quicklynched. I wouldn't even be surprised if the first post was not so much a warning for the town, but more a reminder to his scumbuddies to vote for me if the no lynch option did not have three votes when we are close to the deadline.

That's because I firmly believe you are scum.

[Martino]

That's because I firmly believe you are scum.

Which doesn't change anything. I explained in the post you quoted that if I really was scum, it would be a bad move on your part to vote for me; it wouldn't prevent the mafia players ganging up on a townie right before the deadline. So if no townie would have voted after you did, the mafia could have won the game. In fact, you even pointed out to the mafia how they should win the game. Again you simply do not seem to care about pro town strategies. The pattern is becoming obvious.

[Narsis]

the question that is bugging me...will the mafia win with such a strategy?

tbh i still think a no lynch is a bad idea. what do we gain? no one i have asked has answered the question properly. information-wise there is next to nothing we can learn with the items that we "know" exist. and odds are they would/could kill one of us and roleblock another.(although i dont know how roleblocking works with the items). that would leave only one of us...and odds are that one isnt going to have enough information to come up with a game breaking result. at best we would know that two people moved, but we wouldnt know who. at worst we learn nothing. and tbh knowing that two people moved but not who is next to nothing anyway...