TerrorChrist

Man, I wish I had stuck with my first suspicion that EM was scum Well played.

Please don't put this much pressure on my shoulders... I might collapse!

I had hoped for a better defense... [Vote: AKCPluto

That's a pretty weak motivation...could you be more elaborate?

My thoughts are still settling down.

Interesting analysis. However, they all assume one thing: that we believe you to be townie. Personally, I am not too sure about anyone being townie.

As was I

Man, I wish I had made more of a hassle when I suspected EM on day 1. I guess those who defended him at the time, while attacking CD would be pretty good suspects now, right?

Yay.... ?

*Looks at the distance, noticing that the sun has halfway passed behind the horizon....*

In, provided #2 is finished before #3 starts.

I explained it on day one. And on day 2, and on day 3. I think we're past that station.

I am surprised I am the only one voting EM right now. He´s been my suspect by some before. And the last vote, I was not the only one who gave him the benefit of the doubt. So it is not the continuation of an existing suspicion, but an enhanced suspicion on other acts by this person. Others too said something along the lines of `if this vote is wrong, EM must be maffia`. I also wonder why reign of terror is so firm in his believe AKC is not lying. I am not too sure about this, because his roleclaim is just too close to mine. The way that went down, I have the feeling that the replacement entered the game, threw in a roleclaim, but didn't read the entire history before that. All the moves after that seem -to me- like some "trying to wriggle out of it" actions. AKC has a very strong FoS from me too.

That was actually the only bit that I DID understand

I have no idea what you just said. What is "putting it past Mole"