TerrorChrist

Man, I wish I had stuck with my first suspicion that EM was scum Well played.

Please don't put this much pressure on my shoulders... I might collapse!

I had hoped for a better defense... [Vote: AKCPluto

That's a pretty weak motivation...could you be more elaborate?

My thoughts are still settling down.

Interesting analysis. However, they all assume one thing: that we believe you to be townie. Personally, I am not too sure about anyone being townie.

As was I

Man, I wish I had made more of a hassle when I suspected EM on day 1. I guess those who defended him at the time, while attacking CD would be pretty good suspects now, right?

Yay.... ?

*Looks at the distance, noticing that the sun has halfway passed behind the horizon....*

In, provided #2 is finished before #3 starts.

I explained it on day one. And on day 2, and on day 3. I think we're past that station.

I am surprised I am the only one voting EM right now. He´s been my suspect by some before. And the last vote, I was not the only one who gave him the benefit of the doubt. So it is not the continuation of an existing suspicion, but an enhanced suspicion on other acts by this person. Others too said something along the lines of `if this vote is wrong, EM must be maffia`. I also wonder why reign of terror is so firm in his believe AKC is not lying. I am not too sure about this, because his roleclaim is just too close to mine. The way that went down, I have the feeling that the replacement entered the game, threw in a roleclaim, but didn't read the entire history before that. All the moves after that seem -to me- like some "trying to wriggle out of it" actions. AKC has a very strong FoS from me too.

That was actually the only bit that I DID understand

I have no idea what you just said. What is "putting it past Mole"

I would say that you claiming a role which is similar in many aspects to the one I have claimed is quite a legit undermining of your roleclaim... [/color]

I would say that you claiming a role which is similar in many aspects to the one I have claimed is quite a legit undermining of your roleclaim... [/color]

In that case, bye confusion, hi suspicion Vote: Electric_Mango

Wouldn't all roles be made up...?

Also: what's the deal with "specific" vs "not so specific roles"? Are roles always supposed to be hugely specific?

My first response was: how many times do I have to keep answering this question...I am an ex lifeguard. Then I figured I'd go and check...and what do you know... I am an Ex First Aid Lifeguard. Also, I realized something: I am still alive. Why would maffia keep me alive? This makes me torn between two thoughts: a) EM was my first suspect, for throwing around accusations without foundation (we've discussed that before) On last Lynch, EM provided a list which actually sounded plausible and which I could not find any flaws with. So I went along with it, saying that it was a huge risk. Either the suspect was scum, or EM was. c) The suspect was town, therefore, according to B, EM is my main suspect again. However... everybody knows I am town. Therefore, it was explained to me scum should whack me, to increase the chance of town doing another mislynch (better odds for them). But scum killed someone else. Why? Perhaps because they were pretty sure I'd target EM again? So by keeping a known townie around, who they know would target someone...? So that people would trust that my call is at least based on good intentions? That would actually be an argument to believe EM is town.... Unless of course scum thought I'd suddenly start thinking, and they want me to think I am alive because I would target EM which... in short: I don't know anymore. UNVOTE VOTE COUNT CanucksDynasty (1): AKCPLUTO Not Voting (6): Preston, ccabal86, Electric Mango, reign of terror, CanucksDynasty, TerrorChrist With 7 Alive, 4 is needed to lynch.

I have no idea about rules about consistency, but: a) I do not see how it would be impossible that different people are in a supermarket than somewhere else, but... I'd think it is more consistent that a cowardly lifeguard would search for another (less scary) job and thus become an ex lifeguard... or is this just silly thinking?

My bad, I meant Electronic Mango Unvote Vote: Electronic Mango I sometimes confuse my suspects.... As it says in the scriptures: To err is Human, to admit an error divine.

First of all: I was gonna vote CaoCao last day, but if it wasnt him, many of us, me included, said we'd go for D3mon again. So following that... Vote: D3mon Now on my role... I think I said it was ex-lifeguard, and so it was.