Falzis

I'm still not sold on the why-i-didn't-vote-for-him-in-the-first-place. If you really believed he was scum, and believed him to be more scum than me, he should have been your first choice. As it stands, even if we do both vote for KevinH, my head will still be on the chopping block since I got 2 votes earlier. Not that I want to save my own skin but changing both our votes won't get KevinH lynched (if that's your goal). Plus, I don't think KevinH is scummy for his immediate reversal of stances and I think you are for your false dichotomies. I'm fine with dying. We can let our votes stay where they are.

First, why KevinH? Second, if you believe KevinH is scum, why didn't you vote for him the first place? @CD No. I will be the one to say "I told you so!".

No really I would have. Anyway I think I will be the first to die here and I'll do a KevinH and say "I told you so!" after I die.

Ok then my vote stays on you. Had you voted someone else I would have changed my vote too.

Kevin, Narsis and I only have a 1/7 chance of being scum individually. Together, it's misleading to say we have 2/7 chance of being scum. It's like saying if all of us had one vote placed upon each one of us, then we have a 7/7 chance of being scum (which is 100% and quite impossible)!

This game needs more activity!!

Ugh, because you could be scum?

Well, EM also in another game immediately said he will be changing his style and he drew fire for it and he was proven town. I'm open to people changing gameplays immediately. It's not as if KevinH hasn't had a lot of games before to think it over and not push through with his no lynch crusade. Though I do concede that the possibilities you raise Narsis are possible (he's cop or mafia), I just don't like how you presented it as the only possibilities.

Not really. I agree with his post about false dichotomies.

Vote: Narsis I hate false dichotomies. Plus, I think I'll be following KevinH this game.

^ Oh right. I'm fine with posting it but I think I have to wait for Martino too. Martino, if you want to post it, link it.

Go go go!! I'm in... let's win them all.

Haha what a script-full game. I'm amused. I wonder what secrets in Castle Volant wait to be discovered.

Yeah. Good thing EM voted for CD and that Martino and I were both online some time after. When I switched my vote to CD, CD was online and I was afraid people might catch on if Aquinas, EM, and Narsis were online as well. I was anxiously waiting for Martino to change his vote to CD (I thought he wouldn't because it was precisely 13 mins before he did).

Yeah well from my perspective I felt Narsis was still on the fence, plus EM voted you (which I think meant he didn't believe Narsis?)

HALF of DAY 4 - NIGHT 4 - DAY 5

I like the game. It was a bit tough for townies because of the mystery of possible power roles (hard to second guess) but most games right now that aren't standard will have to be second-guessed pretty hard anyway. But it also became tough for us when we knew of Aquinas' and CD's power roles, which should have been kept as a secret until really crucial, because it limited our choices for N4 kill when Aquinas, CD, and Narsis were grouped in one room. Good thing EM didn't choose, AKC got randomly moved etc. I think to balance it while keeping the 5-1 rule, the map could be changed so that more rooms are adjacent or aren't totally separated by only 1-2 rooms. Or, allow the mafia movement to be unrestricted but with penalties, 100% safely move into the next room (one move) without being discovered (if there are 2 people in the room), 80% safely move two rooms from where you are (two moves) without being discovered etc. I think the town should have followed Narsis more emphatically (given his role claim) and make it into a choice between me or AKC. All in all, a good game that took too long because of inactivity.

EBWOP: I didn't unvote. Unvote Vote: CanucksDynasty

I have a feeling CD might be bussing. He only voted against AKC when EM voted against him and when it was already a consensus by myself, Narsis, and others that AKC is indeed the inactive scum. Vote: CanucksDynasty

If you're already sure AKC is scum, why haven't you voted for him yet Narsis?

Oh right.

My gut still believes AKC to be scum. Inactive theory, Sinkon scum tells, and Narsis' item (which I believe to be credible 2nd only to Aquinas). I'm guessing this day will probably end with a no lynch again if no consensus builds. (Will 2 votes lynch a person? If yes, then I will unvote if there is no lynch consensus before deadline)

No explanation for your vote EM?

Huh? So you're more willing to give him a pass for doing something negative than me who has done something positive? (I assume you would concede I have been more pro-town than him) Oh well. Three votes left - CD, Narsis, and AKC's.

My question was more for Aquinas...