sojourner

took a walk.

10/10

538

garlic

dick

9.999/10

9.999/10

497

starting to decrease.

9/10

20

9.2/10

Okay here is my take on my innocence and my case against EM and Falzis, and their words in most cases speak for themselves. Kevin starts right out with the no lynch...why would he do this if he is scum? The Wiki substantiates him: Allowing the Townspeople to abstain from killing on certain turns can decrease or increase the Mafia win percentage as can variants which make it more difficult for the Mafia to achieve a kill (e.g., requiring them to agree on a victim independently). The "no kill" variant compensates to some extent for the disadvantage given to odd numbers of Townspeople. Otherwise, 2n+1 Innocents are less likely to win than 2n Innocents (for n>2) because they have decreased their odds of voting for a Mafia each turn without increasing their number of turns (resulting in ties rather than Mafia majorities). EM votes for me after Kazio throws my name in the ring with nothing EM Why is everyone jumping on Narsis? I'm guessing one of them is scum. Vote: sojourner Reason: Jumping on the Narsis bandwagon Then Falzis jumps on early on also FALz Ok, hmm... lemme see. sojourner seems a bit cuckoo, the world would be a better place with less mentally instable people. Vote: sojourner Now that they have the suspicion on me they start to get other people to vote EM Sitting around and not voting on day 1 is pointless as many have already said. How else are we to gain information? True the odds of lynching a townie over a scum is higher but it's a chance we must take, if nothing else it will give us information to go off of on day 2. EM sides with Falzis right out the gate I'm giving Falzis a vote of confidence for being most townie so far. I gotta say that I like this guys style. He comes out guns blazin right from the word go. Either he's crazy or he's innocent but right now he's getting some good points from me. My reasoning for the suspicion is that scum would want to wait until a misguided townie starts a lynch and then jump in and try to complete the lynch. a lynch and then jump in and try to complete the lynch. Exactly Kevin hits it right on the button When Aquinas asks what evidence there is against me Falzis Defending on sojourner's behalf much? And pushing for KevinH's head much? Not just he's a bandwagoner but the lack of logical basis for his votes. His recent post proves as much. After SJ votes Kevin it is EM who tries to change his vote I've played several games with Kevin and I have always been impressed with his insight to the inner mechanics of the game. He has always appeared to be a sharp minded strategist and has helped his fellow townies win several games. He's not the weakest link and you said that he's not giving off any scum tells. If you agree with opinion that Kevin can be an asset later in the game it is only logical that you change your vote. I'm not saying that Kevin is giving me any pro town vibes at all. In fact he's one that I'm keeping a watchful eye on because of what I've stated before. This argument was only meant to give insight into my personal views of KevinH and to intellectually challenge SirJesus on his vote. Kevin sees this clearly Kevin I don't vote for no-lynch out of principle. I vote for no-lynch because I believe that the "scumtells" that some people claim are not reliable at all. It's about a 75% chance of killing a townie that we will need later and I don't like those odds. On the other hand, if I am about to be lynched, that's a 100% chance of lynching a townie and I will do what I can to avoid that. Forcing me to put a vote on the second-place candidate is not gathering any additional information; the vote for me might as well go on the second-place candidate straight off because it's the same effect. Falzis We're not getting anywhere except the No Lynch debate still. I do still think sojourner is very suspiciousssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss sssssssss. Now people are starting to see that Falzis is a little pushy without much substance Kevin Is not voting any different than voting no lynch? Not really, unless a majority votes for no lynch then the day can end early. With Sojourner having the most votes at the moment, there will be a few misguided souls who pile on "because we have to lynch somebody". There's only a 25% chance that Sojourner is scum. (Misunderstanding the cop role is not a very strong scum-tell in my opinion.) The scum would love to have one less townie. Will they get their way? Or will we coast into the deadline without a lynch? Note that at deadline, only a half majority is required to lynch so that would be 4 votes by my count. Narsi Just a little clearing up but why so hard on sojourner? he's new to the game and may not fully understand how cop roles work. i think it would warrant an explanation at worst(as you gave) but no reason for an FoS or vote. the same goes to junk and anyone else on the sojourner wagon. Aquinas Finally, I looked through a few of Falzis' posts. In many of them he he calling for voting or some other rash action rather than discussion, at least as of late. I wouldn't raise a finger of suspicion or even a nod but, its something I'll keep in mind. I know for a good while he was just looking for people to post with him. His post count is probably high, I don't know exactly what to make of this except that it may be a way to get people riled up and vote. Overall however, I get good feelings from him and I don't suspect i'll be needing to vote for him any time soon. I might just be groveling for scum tells by this point... Falzis wants the vote since he knows he is scum and so is EM it is in their best interest to keep the finger on me Falzis I like how Electric Mango and Aquinas posts their townie vibes. If they're getting a good feeling on me, and telling people about it, and I know I'm a townie, I'm getting good vibes from them too. Scum don't usually do town / scum readings especially on the first day so I'm picking up good signals from them. And Vote already people. Show your cards... if you're not insane. Push for the vote Narsis to be honest there is no good case against anyone. at least not one good enough to warrant a vote...yet. Falzis Vote for anybody Narsis if as you said it's better to lynch than to not lynch. -.- EM I hope the voting picks up. There are still lots of people who say that voting is the best way but have not voted for anyone yet. If we don't vote to lynch someone today then how are we going to pick up on voting patterns later in the game? It will be just like Day 1 started all over again. Did someone say dejevu? Well, I guess it won't be entirely the same, we'll have 1 less townie. Aquinas picks up on the push to vote and who …me Aquinas Falzis, I understand your rational for wanting more voting. You seem to be quite pushy about getting people to make uninformed and uncomfortable choices. This makes me uncomfortable and I'll be strait with you, a bit suspicious. I don't understand why you are so adamant about this. I think rather than taunting and pushing people to vote your time would be better spent bringing forward some evidence for who we should vote for. Clearly, the problem is we don't have someone who we feel needs to be voted for rather than our desire to vote. Do you notice any patterns or have any evidence against someone? Hopefully besides Sojourner and KevinH since those two both have been discussed to death. Falzis Ok here's what I think. Frankly, I think either sojo is really scum because at this point still, no one is jumping on him so it must mean his Mafia friends aren't voting because Mafia would have jumped already on someone (assuming they number around 3 people in this game) to push a lynch. And no one wants to vote as the fourth person for lynching sojo because that would still make the half majority rule. Falzis But I'll stick to sojo for the meantime, my gut is telling me to stick with it for now. If he dies, more food to ration for everyone (I actually only care about more food for me)! MUAHAHA So I think that it was just coincidence that I came up for vote. I am new to the game so I did not know how to defend myself. EM and Falzis both jumped me knowing that and then tried to sway others to vote. Hey also started talking people out of voting for others so they could sway them towards me. They both pushed for the vote knowing they were in the clear with the heat off and fingers on me. And then my misfortune of losing the internet and this family emergency have caused me to not be watching and posting as good as I could have which has given them the opportunity to use my silence as a reason to vote me. They were the two who stuck to voting for me all along. I think that all these facts add up to a scum tell for Falzis and EM.

I am sure this will change what everyone thinks..I am out of town on a family emergency and have not been on except for short times. I know I am town. The reason I have voted for Falzis is that he has gone crazy trying to take the fingers off of himself. The reason that people think I am scum is cause I did not post much,well what about Aquinas who has jumped in my bandwagon quickly after not posting much himself. If sacrificing a townie to get info is what you want then sacrifice me. To me the scum is stil Falzis and so I am sticking with my vote.

Paul

9.9999/10

sprawl

who? just kidding...9/10

After reading the Wiki on no lynch I am going to use that knowledge and my gut to vote... vote-Falzis

8/10

8.5/10

Stranglers

This is Kevin's whole case against Falsis......?????

Nerau came through as suspected so Unvote Nerau Now, Falsis or Kevin

Narsis ..you left out commenting on some people in Falzis post., for instance no remarks on Theo Nerau Martino Aquinas comments on me, soj yourself Kevin Aquinas EM SJ any reason you did not comment on the first 4? sojourner As for my vote, it still seems odd that Nerau has not put out any theories... VOTE NERAU