Fox Fire

False. TNP has traveled to a foreign country.

Oi! Lemme back in!

Ruler Name: Fox Fire Nation Link: https://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=527884

Holy crap the spam forum is dead. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ejga4kJUts

And again, I totally understand the reasoning. I am just bemused at the apparent inconsistancy as the 2nd only mentions "arms". Besides the "primary reason" would nudge me into thinking handguns are more appropiate as less hassle/training is required to get meaningfull results (I am not saying handguns are more usefull in a fully trained scenario). Let me state it the other way around, why would the reasoning behind 21y restriction on handguns not apply to other guns? Which comes down to the next question, is the Constitution robust enough to support a 18 over 21 decision. Actually handguns are just as difficult to use as long guns. They are meant for short range, so aside from shooting someone at point blank range, which would be just as easy as doing so with a rifle, they still require just as much practice. The major difference between a handgun and long gun is that handguns are easy to conceal, thus assassination/murder is generally much easier with a handgun. You just have to get close enough. Which is why it's the preferred murder weapon in the US. You would actually get much better results out of a long gun, especially in an actual combat situation. They just aren't as easy to hide. As for the constitution, it does say "will not be infringed". This is certainly infringing. On the other hand it says "to keep and bear", not "to purchase". Which is why it will likely hold. In any case, just want to express my outrage one more time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0-AMuxAu10 Why does Florida have to be so damn stupid? I mean, Florida man is a literal meme now. Pls stop being do dumb Florida.

They would actually be the third state to do so, I believe. The fact that it's 21 to "purchase" a gun and not "own" one is a major reason why it will probably hold and everyone will just allow the government keep slowly chipping away. If this isn't infringement, IDK what is. As the sister of a vet who was sent to war before 21, I find it utterly insulting. If this does hold, we're starting to face a pretty slippery slope. That is why I said this: That and Trump has always been a wildcard, heck he swayed so much on this one topic already he puts palmtree's to shame... And I already explained. Handguns account for the vast majority of firearms murders and at the same time, handguns will be of little use for the primary reason of the 2nd. Access to long guns > Access to handguns

So I was just looking through the news... And saw that Florida just raised the age limit to purchase firearms.... And Trump supports this. This is unacceptable. We cannot allow this unconstitutional idiocy to keep spreading. To the guillotine with these criminal politicians!

Now this just screams inconsistancy, what was even the reasoning to make handguns 21? They account for the vast majority of murders because you can easily hide them. Rifles are good enough until people have become more mature as adults.

We shouldn't raise the age to own a gun. At 18 you should have the right to make all your own adult decisions. Including buying a gun, voting, screwing whoever you want and even drinking. The 21 year age limit for owning a handgun I suppose I can agree with.

Anything you'd suggest or need help with? Hey, I can make art again! Check your old graphics request. *Shrugs* I have a new, actual PC now. Someone has to do art since yur too lazy. (Even though that part of the forum looks dry as a bone) I haven't done art for years now. I got tired of doing a shit load of it for free (not just IRON) and when I asked for some form of payment the person almost had a heart attack and said "But you always do it for free. I wasn't expecting to pay anything." LOL. I think like 99% of my art (photoshop or otherwise) was done for free. But IDC. I do it for fun and can always turn people down. I learned after high school that trying to compete in the art world is virtually impossible when your competition is like half the human population. Wish I would have known that before wasting money to pursue a completely useless degree. "It's hard out here for a pimp".

1. For protection and home defense, be it against criminals, foreign invaders or a tyrannical government. 2. Entertainment and interest. I've always been fascinated with the mechanics and physics of guns. So simple, yet so complex. Like sports, they are fun to shoot and challenge yourself with. 3. Hunting. Some meats are a commodity and can't be bought in stores. Said meats are also far better tasting than domesticated, fatty processed animals.

Anything you'd suggest or need help with? Hey, I can make art again! Check your old graphics request. *Shrugs* I have a new, actual PC now. Someone has to do art since yur too lazy. (Even though that part of the forum looks dry as a bone)

A Study of Active Shooter Incidents in the United States between 2000 and 2013 is the FBI study. I'll have to hunt for the others, but that's also the more recent one i know of. You can agree, but it doesn't make you not wrong. While im disinclined to say so entries should never be done, there is a reason many PDs explicitly forbid it as a option in cases. I'm not spouting hypotheticals, thisbis a well studied topic. Whay he did is litteraly what cops are trained to do in many places. The places that do train for solo entry, and not many provide adequate training( seriously three day course with minimal training) o, do so because the nearest backup maybe 30 minutes away. Even then it's not considered a good option. And usually the officers have better equipment avallibe than a service pistol and a blue shirt. 30% chance of being shot per a 200 to 2010 study. 46% of being a casualty per the FBI. And that's all active scene solo entries, which wiill include a large number of best case scenario for a solo entry Wich this most definitely was not. That sort of danger is never what someone is expected to confront. Those who chose to do so tend to end up heavily commended for courage and action far above any call of duty. Often posthumously. This is no more what a police officer is expected to do than it is for your hypothetical fire fighter to run into that building with a fire extinguisher and some safety squints for protection. JFC the military wouldnt expect that out of a solider, explicitly trained to deal with that kind of shit. You think it's something to be routinly expected of a glorified hall moniter old enough to be a grandfather? Calling the dude a coward is a vile and crass attempt to foist the blame for this onto him; for doing exactly what s expected of police officers all around the country. Its an attempt to make what happened his fault and pretend that it only happened because of him. It is absolutely disgusting. Because the officers life is more important than those of our kids.... You say this isn't what's expected of a police officer except even the local sheriff agrees with me here, as does the superintendent and the students. The school staff decided to sacrifice their lives to protect students, but not the officer. Is that expected of them? No, it's not. But they weren't cowards. He should have gone in and confronted the killer. Armed officers are in schools for this exact reason. They don't carry guns to break up fights in the hallway. They carry guns to protect students from psychos with guns. You say this isn't what's expected of a police officer except even the local sheriff agrees with me here, as does the superintendent and the students. Really, the students? gonna need to source that. The students and their families and the teachers have criticized the shit out of the PD for utterly failing to respond or take action on the initial information *before* the shooting. But on this guy? Very few people have said anything about him. well know, there is this: Feel free to google the quote yourself and pick a source you like. People who are criticizing him? Media talking heads with an axe to grind, folks like the sheriff playing a game of CYA, politicians with an axe to grind... Hey on the topic of criticism, know who aren't being lambasted in the media? The other three officers who showed up....and did exactly the same thing. What you want and seem to expect is for a random sheriff's deputy to have IARD training or something equivalent. Which can be done. but IARD requires that the officers be equipped in a way that makes them effective (ie, rifle or carbine and body armor), it requires continual training (which PDs rarely provide), and requires a massive overhaul of fire arms training and practice from the usual PD standards (Shot accountability is a BFD when shooting in a crowded environment). four officers from the BSO, none of them equipped with ballistic protection or a patrol rifle, none of whom enter the building. Oh and this is after two other officers completely fail to take any worthwhile action despite more than enough information and credible reason to do so. Do ya really think that's reflective of a PD that trains and equips for that? If that's the standard you wana have? Fine. But you are in for one hell of a surprise if you think the shit show that is the average PD manages to do that effectively right now. Three day course, max,; often two days with only one day of physical training, not continuing training, no performance standards and they maybe get a refresher every 5 years. Many don't do it. other's might want to do it, but don't get the funding. and a few get the funding and then quietly misappropriate the cash . If you think broward county does it in the light if a half dozen different officers failing to take appropriate action by that standard...I've a bit of waterfront property in Brooklyn to sell ya, real easy to get to Manhattan from there. There's a reason Scott Isreal is being so very shocked and appalled at everything. Oh as for the superintendent: yea this was made worse by the utter shitshow that was the school distircts active shooter response training. It was not only not proper by all indications, but was flawed sufficiently that the bastard actually exploited it in order to kill more people. Dude's looking to spread the manure around cause he's gonna have a lot of it dumped on him soon. Look dude, it's really simple. Children are being slaughtered by a gunman. You are the only other person with a gun. What do you do? I know what I'd do. Screw the training, screw the overall PD, screw all the prior warning signs, that's all a completely different discussion. Relevant to the actions of the SRO himself: The fact is, unarmed teachers sacrificed themselves to protect those kids, but the one asshole with a gun chose to hide. If that doesn't seem wrong, if that doesn't seem like cowardice to you, then IDK what would.

You can agree, but it doesn't make you not wrong. While im disinclined to say so entries should never be done, there is a reason many PDs explicitly forbid it as a option in cases. I'm not spouting hypotheticals, thisbis a well studied topic. Whay he did is litteraly what cops are trained to do in many places. The places that do train for solo entry, and not many provide adequate training( seriously three day course with minimal training) o, do so because the nearest backup maybe 30 minutes away. Even then it's not considered a good option. And usually the officers have better equipment avallibe than a service pistol and a blue shirt. 30% chance of being shot per a 200 to 2010 study. 46% of being a casualty per the FBI. And that's all active scene solo entries, which wiill include a large number of best case scenario for a solo entry Wich this most definitely was not. That sort of danger is never what someone is expected to confront. Those who chose to do so tend to end up heavily commended for courage and action far above any call of duty. Often posthumously. This is no more what a police officer is expected to do than it is for your hypothetical fire fighter to run into that building with a fire extinguisher and some safety squints for protection. JFC the military wouldnt expect that out of a solider, explicitly trained to deal with that kind of shit. You think it's something to be routinly expected of a glorified hall moniter old enough to be a grandfather? Calling the dude a coward is a vile and crass attempt to foist the blame for this onto him; for doing exactly what s expected of police officers all around the country. Its an attempt to make what happened his fault and pretend that it only happened because of him. It is absolutely disgusting. Because the officers life is more important than those of our kids.... You say this isn't what's expected of a police officer except even the local sheriff agrees with me here, as does the superintendent and the students. The school staff decided to sacrifice their lives to protect students, but not the officer. Is that expected of them? No, it's not. But they weren't cowards. He should have gone in and confronted the killer. Armed officers are in schools for this exact reason. They don't carry guns to break up fights in the hallway. They carry guns to protect students from psychos with guns.