How is me voting for EM a suspect? If you go back and look it was me who put the FOS on him before anyone else. If i suspect someone and I do not get any other evidence or arguments which can convince me otherwise, of course I will vote for him be it the half lynch vote, the 1st vote or the last vote. I don't see how a half lynch vote has any bearing anyway as EM was lynched by majority at the end and there was not a tie.
I gave a long explanation of why I found one of the non-voters suspicious in my last post. It is interesting that you chose to ignore addressing that post and instead chose to make a wild claim how I am trying to kill off inactive townies.
It's not a wild claim. It's based on yesterdays voting record which is the most concrete source we have at the moment.
I agree with you that Reign of Terror has been less than helpful. However, I don't think his inactivity is more scummy than activity that leads strait to the death of a townie (i.e. your half majority vote on ElectricMango). It matters it wasn't the first vote because it means that when you voted, if you're townie, you were confident enough in your assertion that he ought to be lynched. Since no one else seemed to be anywhere near the full majority in this case, it means a lot. Therefore, I chose to focus some attention on you, rather than pilling on someone who was relatively inactive. If your intention was to get us to focus on a player who isn't around often to defend himself and get a quick lynch on him that could also be scummy, but I don't want to put words in your mouth.
I agree with the overall sentiment in the last few posts, lets not be too hasty.
I'll be interested to hear from ccabal, as he was the most outspokenly wrong, his new opinions will be interesting.