@KevinH
- You suggest in #67 that the vig not kill tonight because he only has 30% odds even though I already explained in #58 that his odds are more like 50%.
- You downplay the information we can gather on Day 1. In fact much can be learned. Especially from wagons that form near the deadline and even more definitely from looking back at the convo and vote records after the lynch has flipped.
- You're idea to make vig kill suggestions is wrong on several levels. One of them being that the vig must factor the lynch flip into his decision and there is no point in making suggestions before this information is available.
@Imran Eshan
- Although I agree that inactives are not very useful, Martino having pre-announced his absence should be excluded from that at least until Thursday.
- More importantly, by auto-voting for an inactive you are just helping the scum. All they have to do to save themselves from your vote is putting in a couple of meaningless posts. Therefore auto-voting for an inactive is a sure way to lynch a townie and should be avoided.
- On top of that, it's not just the scum that may try to keep a low profile. The Dietician and the Vig may also want to keep attention away from them.
- Furthermore, by voting for an inactive you deprive the town of the ability to analyze your vote in relation to what has been said so far.
If you wish to remain off my suspect list you should change your vote rather soonish.
FOS @Shepard
@Xarastier @Rafay @Nerau @Lyner
Other then your RV posts you have so far only gotten 1 (Rafay) or 2 (Nerau, Lyner) very short posts in, or even none at all (Xarastier). Speak up please and elaborate. Who do you feel is more/less likely to be scum and why do you think that?