http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-32213482
This thread is probably going to start a shitstorm and i'm really interested in how certain people here who normally defend Americans gun laws react after watching the video in the link above.
All I really have to say is, America your gun laws are a fucking joke.
Also notice how the idiot starts screaming for him to put his arms behind his back, like all of a sudden he wants to follow protocol, makes me fucking sick.
What really ticks me off is the officer immediately attempting to plant evidence on him after killing him so casually.
Thank god law prevailed and he's facing a murder charge
So your in favor of cops not having guns? I dont understand how civilian gun control is a factor in a cop commiting a unjust murder.
because humans are not robots, they have feelings, emotions that can change who they are, their morals at any point in time.
It's like a time bomb, some will eventually explode, some may never. The possibility will ALWAYS be there.
This cop for example, could have been the angel of them all when he first started, over years in service things he'd seen, situations he had gone through would have caused his moralities to change and thus ended up here.
We'll probably forever go over this argument (Americans vs other nations who have strict gun laws) and I honestly can't think of a way to solve it that will actually work. But my opinion is that guns should only be used in times of war or for simple sport and not for personal defense.
You are correct. Emotions play a huge role in how scenarios play out. It is impossible to remove them from any scenario, so the best we can do is figure out how to deal with them correctly.
I would imagine that this cop was not always a "bad guy". He probably joined the police force with the intention of making his city a better and safer place. His experiences most likely changed his perceptions, and from those experiences he made an incredibly poor (in my opinion) decision. As the facts come out we will get a better idea. The defense will paint the picture of who they want him to appear to be, and the prosecution will paint him in the light they want him seen in. He will probably be somewhere in the middle.
I will disagree with your last statement that guns should not be used for personal defense. A person with proper training, practice, and awareness who is carrying a firearm for defense can be the difference between one injury/death and dozens. The statistics point out that guns were used a reported 2.5 millions times to stop a crime last year. That's reported. 2.5 million crimes. That is over 6800 per day used in self defense. I think that is reason enough to disagree with your statement.
The other reason I think that the view is skewed is the statistical number of guns used in crimes.
In 2012, there were an estimated 1,214,462 violent crimes. There are 300,000,000 guns in America. That means that less than one half a percentage of all (legally owned) guns in America could have been used in a violent crime assuming that all violent crimes were committed with guns, and that a different gun was used in each crime.
It is somewhere near 25% of violent crime is committed with some sort of a weapon. That is a gun, knife, or other object.
Yes there are problems. Yes there is plenty of room for improvement. But, I do not agree that taking my guns away makes me safer. I have used mine on two occasions as a civilian for self defense, or defense of another. In both cases I was glad that I was able to stop a criminal act. In the one case I would not have been able to help the other person without it.