910 replies to this topic

[iSocialism]

Does any one have an unofficial vote count? I'm too lazy

[KevinH]

On day 1: 

• I want to see how hard the scum push to talk the townies out of the optimal no-lynch strategy.
• I want to see who has regular activity.
• I want to see who has the best humor.

On later days:

• I want to analyze votes to see who tried to save whom.
• I want to guess about who did an investigation and decide whether I should follow them.
• If all else fails, lynch the least active and least humorous.

[Robert2424]

I still think Day one is valuable. I think Voting for a no lynch as early as Kevin has defeats the purpose though. I not going to place a No Lynch vote until I've given up getting info on day 1. 

[KevinH]

Unvote.

 

I don't want the day to end early.

[brewersalliance]

@MK, can we get a vote count update?  gracias 

[vgmmaster]

Unofficial Vote Count:

 

legoboyvdlp (2): Robert2424, SeaBeeGipson
GoldIron (2): The Warrior, Canik
KitKat16 (1): lachiton,  legoboyvdlp
Canik (1): GoldIron, FrigidInferno
FrigidInferno (1): vgmmaster
Lachiton (1): KitKat16
The Warrior (1): Rafay
SeaBeeGipson (0):
Robert2424 (0):
Brewersalliance (0):
KevinH (0):
Vgmmaster (0):
Rafay (0):
iSocialism (0):
 

No Lynch (0):
 
Not Voting: brewersalliance, KevinH, iSocialism

 

I'm just as surprised as you guys are Kevin took his vote off of No Lynch.

[vgmmaster]

Haven't had a chance to go back through the thread like I promised yesterday like I had hoped. That said, when compiling the unofficial vote count, two things stood out that I want to point out.

 

/ooc lol you scientifical bastard, you. /ooc

Adding my two cents by saying I still wanna lynch canik for allowing the secretive killings to go on as long as they have. This should have been address the second they started.

very well said

Un-Vote: No-Lynch

Vote: Canik, for allowing these killings to go unhindered, and for public indecency (Stop flashing yourself you drunk bastard")

 

Joke post on Canik. I made the same joke vote on Canik back on page 1. This is on page 8 (post #157). At this point, the time for joke votes is over. Plus your comedic timing is off. Thing to remember is, he made the same joke vote once before back on page two (post #28) and within hours of GoldIron's vote on Canik as well putting Canik to three at the time early.

 

One other thing that has rubbed me the wrong way. Lord MK's clarification post about any punishment for outing mafia members. In it, he says if the mafia agree to it, it could be used as a strategy and wouldn't invoke a punishment. Now, I don't necessarily think it was a mafia ploy. Truth is, it's risky as hell and if Kitkat is indeed scum it could easily bite them in the ass.

 

But let's play devil's advocate. Others can attest to this better than I can, but I realize The Warrior is experienced in mafia. I know Kitkat and Robert have both played mafia, but can't attest to their experience necessarily (I think this is the first game I played with Robert iirc). What I'm getting at is this. I don't know if Kitkat would come up with a ploy like that on his own, but I wouldn't put it past The Warrior. With the mafia day talk, I could see a scenario where the Warrior connives the plan and tell Kitkat to post it, thinking we'd write it off as one of Kitkat's joke posts.

 

I haven't had reason to suspect Robert / The Warrior in the early game, but when I go back through the thread, I'll be paying extra close attention to them. At least their posts should be easily dissect-able. I'm still scared of trying to reread the love pyramid.

[Lord MK]

Vote Count:

legoboyvdlp (2): Robert2424, SeaBeeGipson
GoldIron (2): The Warrior, Canik
KitKat16 (2): lachiton, legoboyvdlp
Canik (2): GoldIron, FrigidInferno
FrigidInferno (1): vgmmaster
Lachiton (1): KitKat16
The Warrior (1): Rafay
SeaBeeGipson (0):
Robert2424 (0):
Brewersalliance (0):
KevinH (0):
Vgmmaster (0):
Rafay (0):
iSocialism (0):


No Lynch (0):

Not Voting: brewersalliance, KevinH, iSocialism

[FrigidInferno]

i was being legitimate? he roleplayed being the mayor and so i roleplayed he do something about it. lol.

[Lachiton]

The resident Day 1 no lyncher KevinH took his vote off no lynch! Isn't that something OOC of him? vgm touched upon it but I guess we need a bit more analysis on it? Also I don't understand his reasoning behind it - he didn't want the day to end early - like how?
Maybe I am fussing over nothing but it's out of the blue.

[brewersalliance]

im holding off with my vote for now. just waiting to see whos at 3 votes right before deadline to hammer them in.

 

Just kidding

 

or am i?!?

[legoboyvdlp]

<p>On day 1:

• I want to see how hard the scum push to talk the townies out of the optimal no-lynch strategy.
• I want to see who has regular activity.
• I want to see who has the best humor.

On later days:

• I want to analyze votes to see who tried to save whom.
• I want to guess about who did an investigation and decide whether I should follow them.
• If all else fails, lynch the least active and least humorous.

And I firmly believe no lynch to harm town. You get practically no information escept who did or did not vote no lynch. As I know you always do this I won't say you are scummier because of this but I firmly believe your play styoe to be boring and anti town at best.
I won't be likely back before Monday.

Also, Frigid if nobody else was lynchable I'd vote you for that, joke votes on page 9 are a no no.

[KevinH]

The resident Day 1 no lyncher KevinH took his vote off no lynch! Isn't that something OOC of him? vgm touched upon it but I guess we need a bit more analysis on it? Also I don't understand his reasoning behind it - he didn't want the day to end early - like how?
Maybe I am fussing over nothing but it's out of the blue.

 

Look at it in context.

 

I still think Day one is valuable. I think Voting for a no lynch as early as Kevin has defeats the purpose though. I not going to place a No Lynch vote until I've given up getting info on day 1.

 
 

Unvote.
 
I don't want the day to end early.

 

Is there a difference between voting for no-lynch with no support vs not voting and letting the deadline arrive?
 

[legoboyvdlp]

Yes, the latter means you can do what I did. The former means day 1 is over in a few days with practically no discussion.

[KevinH]

"with no support" means the day won't end early because it takes 8 players to vote no-lynch to make the day end early.

[KevinH]

I'm just as surprised as you guys are Kevin took his vote off of No Lynch.

 
means humor implied
 

The resident Day 1 no lyncher KevinH took his vote off no lynch! Isn't that something OOC of him? vgm touched upon it but I guess we need a bit more analysis on it? Also I don't understand his reasoning behind it - he didn't want the day to end early - like how?
Maybe I am fussing over nothing but it's out of the blue.

 
 

Yes, the latter means you can do what I did. The former means day 1 is over in a few days with practically no discussion.

 

FoS: Lachiton and legoboyvdlp
... for not grasping basic concepts

[Canik]

But let's play devil's advocate. Others can attest to this better than I can, but I realize The Warrior is experienced in mafia. I know Kitkat and Robert have both played mafia, but can't attest to their experience necessarily (I think this is the first game I played with Robert iirc). What I'm getting at is this. I don't know if Kitkat would come up with a ploy like that on his own, but I wouldn't put it past The Warrior. With the mafia day talk, I could see a scenario where the Warrior connives the plan and tell Kitkat to post it, thinking we'd write it off as one of Kitkat's joke posts.

​I'd be surprised if The Warrior proposed that plan because it's so insanely risky and what pay-off has their been? Are none of us suspicious of Kitkat/TW/Robert now? I know I still am. You still are. I doubt anyone has wrote them off as town.

The only way the plan wouldn't be real dumb is if Kitkat is scum and the two he said are his allies are town. That way we waste time on them, possibly lynch them, after we discovered Kitkat was indeed scum. 
 

[Kitkat16]

guys as amused and flattered as i am that you're still discussing this if i and/or tw and robert were scum then outing myself and/or them would be insanely dumb. my joke is better read as what it is: a joke

[vgmmaster]

On mobile, so not going to try quoting posts:

Re: Kevin voting - my statement on Kevin was a joke. When I did an unofficial vote count, I wanted the post to be just that and not discussion on twenty other things.

See Frigid, that is comedic timing.

As for not wanting to end the day early, it was a few days and several pages since a vote count was last done. While I can't speak for Kevin, I was certainly confused were the current votes we're situated.

Re: Kitkat Love Pyramid / Comedy Club - if you read the first part of that post, I even acknowledge that it was a flawed plan at best with a low statistical chance of being legit. All I wanted was to look at both sides of the coin and get the thought out there since who knows if I'll live long enough to see day 2. I believe Brewers initially ruled out his own thought, but it could have more merit than he initially realized.

Plus, Kit Kat seems adamant it was a joke. Could be trying to save his own hide. And I fully admit that even though I realize Kitkat jokes half the time, maybe I don't fully understand his sense of humor.

That said, flawed plan or not, I don't think you can disagree that lynching KitKat is the worst in the world. Just depends on who in the love pyramid you side with most.

Heck, I'd say best candidates right now our either KitKat, frigid, or goldiron (based on the inactive policy). Keep in mind this is before rereading the thread.

Speaking of, is it possible to get goldiron pinged? Mk?

[FrigidInferno]

i guess i gotta be non-rp. hmmph.

Unvote:Canik