You know, MK believably role claimed earlier and pushed for a second WP lynch. I’m strongly inclined to think he’s town.
On the other Robert has been gunning for him. The first time we tried to Lynch WP Robert repeatedly said he was ready to hammer him, but never voted for him at all. The 2nd time Robert argued strongly against lynching WP and voted for MK, instead. It seems Robert has been deflecting and protecting WP by trying to implicate the person who consistently tried to lynch him.
I find this to be very scummy.
VOTE ROBERT2424
I strongly disagree that Robert is scum.
So lets look at your reasons for why you think Robert is scum. You say that the first time we put WP up for the first time Robert Kept saying he was ready to hammer him, however that is just not the case. Lets look at what Robert actually said (posts about WP from d2)
Ok. I miss understood.
Watcher is damning. Only way we didn't see another was because of a ninja. But Im willing to place hammer on wolfpacks once people are ready to end the day.
So Robert mentions he would be willing to place the hammer on WP once we were ready to end the day. He did not say he wants to hammer in WP and end the day early, he just said he would be willing to cast the hammer vote if town felt like they got all the info out of the day
Here is Robert letting us know WP is 1 vote away from being hammered. This was posted 14 min after the post where he said he would be willing to end the day when town is ready. Clearly Robert did not want to end the day several days early, and he wanted to make sure we continued discussing other potential things before the day ended.
Reguadless. I can hammer if need be.
Robert said a second time he can he the hammer if need be. He did not say he was ready to end the day early and hammer WP in, again, which is highlighted in his next post:
Other opionions aren't bad, if we have other suspects, bring them up. this day shouldn't only be about Wolfpacks. If there is any other value we can get out of the day, lets get it.
Clearly Robert felt there are other potential things out there to discuss and we could get it out of the day if we wanted to. Robert never suggested ending the day prematurely with a hammer vote, he only suggested he could hammer the vote if town decides they have nothing left to discuss.
Now lets look at your argument for D3 that Robert changed his tune on WP
From my experence, most the time Lynch proof is most the time scum, however can be scum. However, unless we have a vig come forward, I'm leaning for him to be town atm.
@Kverst, your response is interesting. I'm not sure what to make of it.
@Wolfpacks, what did you do last night and results?
Ooc tbh mafia was the furthest from my mind as i had to be more worried about my grieving wife who buried her sister the other day and as i thought i was lynched i didn't do nothing. Shes now back to work and I can concentrate better now.
Ok then, this says he didn't know he was lynch proof.
@sister midnight, I meant Lynch proof is normally a town buff. But since somebody stopped the lynch, he isn't lynch proof, just protected by somebody.
Robert corrects himself and made a typo. He said he thinks lynchproof is usually a town role, and in part this is supported by the wiki that lynchrpoof is typically overpowered if it is a scum role. Robert was consistant all day with saying we dont know if WP is X shot or fully lynch proof and we should lynch a different suspect instead of wasting the day.
He shouldn't go anywhere. I think its in the towns best interest to let him survive the day. Look elsewhere and instead of wraped around 2 days of lynching the same person with no additional insight other then his role.
I find it really interesting that you are keying in on Robert not wanting to lynch WP on d3 because he might survive the link, when several members of the town did the exact same thing. Lets look at everyone who suggested the same thing as Robert: Me, Kverst, Colonel Medved, nadarr, Rafay and one really really interesting person - You (Sister Midnight)
But I’d rather find a better suspect and hope for a vigilante to act tonight.
I find it pretty convenient that you shared the exact same opinion as Robert that we should find a better suspect, yet then you use that as the exact reason for why Robert is scum.
One thing I am really curious about is which night Mk investigated WP and nadarr.
So MK says he got a guilty on WP. He came out and claimed that yet did not actually vote for WP. WP nearly got away with not being lynched. MK posted multiple times that he was very confident that WP was a 1 shot lynchproof.
Because lynchproof is too OP to be more than 1-shot. I am willing to risk it for confirming it. A
For all that's worth, 1-shot is like the maximum a mod can give on a super OP role such as Lynchproof, Killproof, Immortal.
So if MK got a guilty on WP, why would his vote be here, especially considering MK claimed several times it was only a 1 shot lynchproof and that it was work the risk to lynch him again:
Colonel Medved (1): Lord MK
At 90 min to deadline, WP had zero total votes. And the cop who claims to have a guilty on him and was 100% convinced WP was only a 1 shot lynchproof was not voting for WP, but was instead voting for Colonel Medved for the sole reason that Medved placed a vote on him earlier in the day.
I knew that wp was a 1-shot because i have been playing this shit for a long time.
So I ask you this MK. If you knew that WP was guilty and that he was a 1 shot and thus would die with a second lynch, why on earth was your vote on Medved and not him?
And here again you are voting for medved, simply because he does not trust you.
You are claiming you got a guilty on someone who was already found to be scum. When you put everything together it just feels off to me.
Also @MK, which nights did you investigate nadarr and WP?