Sign In
Create Account
This topic is locked
I agree that Robert being fixated on the jester role was unhelpful and sort of weird. I was pissed when MK flipped jester, especially before I saw that the game was continuing. If that would have ended the game I would have chewed Brewers out big time. Having said that, what's done is done. We can't change it so we shouldn't be fixated on it anymore. We have scum to find. Robert's issue with the jester shouldn't have continued as long as it did imo so I did view that as sort of scummy. For this reason I can't really fault Kverst for his vote. However, as noted by others I find the timing to be sort of suspect. It came 21 hours later immediately after 2 votes were placed on Robert. I can't speak for Kverst's time when being able to check the game and post so it may be true that he just couldn't post until then but to do so immediately after two people had just voted for Robert makes it look incredibly convenient for him if he is scum looking for a lynch.
His vote on Robert is a contributing factor, but you never even addressed or posted thoughts on his past actions... He was initially the 6th vote on iSoc, yet today claimed that he assumed it would be a trial by combat. Reference bottom of page 6: https://ironcentral.org/community/topic/62585-ba-02-a-clash-of-kings-mafia-day-3/page-6
Because two players unvoted, the final count makes it appear as if he was the fourth vote, and thus just pushing a combat trial. When you look at the actual thread, the story is different. I find it very reasonable that as a scum member he saw the quote I posted and used the most readily excuse available, forgetting the actual context of his vote. Here's the post itself:
sig fixed (though not opposed to the joke). From what people are saying, iSoc seems to be acting a little...off. As we do need someone to be voted up...
unvote
vote iSoc
On page 7 you can then see:
"With 18 alive, it takes 10 to lynch or 5 at deadline. Deadline is Monday, Jan 7th and 3:00 PM CN time."
The goal should be to put someone at 4 or less votes so they go to trial by combat.
By my count, it'siSocialism (6): The Warrior, Robert2424, nadarr, Lachiton, Sister Midnight, Kverst
Strong FoS: Sister Midnight, Kverst
... for putting iSocialism into the lynch range rather than trial by combat.
Weak FoS: The Warrior, Robert2424, nadarr, Lachiton
... for not unvoting yet.
There's time left, but I know a scum would rather have lynch than a trial by combat.
This was met by Nadarr and SM both unvoting before MK ended the day and caused the lynch.
Now fast forward to today where we hear:
@LordSunday I don't know what pattern you're referring to. If it's the timing of my posts, I cannot help what time and who posts before I am able to get on and post. Also, I wasn't hopping onto any wagons that were undoubtedly going to result in a lynch (iSoc was supposed to go to trial by combat, and I made it clear that I didn't like what MK did) or that I would have hammered through. Then are you saying I shouldn't use my vote?
With all the information, it's obvious that this post was a blatant lie. iSoc was already in a position to be lynched when Kverst placed his vote on D1, yet it appeared that he didn't by the end of day due to other players unvoting.
The reasoning and excuses don't match what was posted, and to me rings as some super scummy behavior not keeping a story straight.
I'm not discounting Robert's deflection of actual scum hunting as suspicious, but it almost seems that we're getting more hung up on someone pissed about a jester than someone with scum tracks written all across the board.
Was retired, now keeping busy 
Back to top
