572 replies to this topic

[Lord MK]

Well, screw you.
We are going to lynch you.
We are going to get 8.

[Rafay]

Well, screw you. We are going to lynch you. We are going to get 8.

 

Vote: Lord MK

 

He did the same thing last game. Got me lynched and crippled the town and then won as mafia. Lynch him

[Velocity]

OK so here's the deal.

I'm Percy's mother. I needed +1 votes to be lynched yesterday. Now I need +2. I'm a town role. Every time I get saved from a lynch the required amount of votes to lynch me increases.

You need 8 or 5 at deadline to lynch me now.

I'm pretty sure MK is an anti town role since he's leading hard to get me lynched.

Percy’s mother having that kind of modifier makes sense, since Percy is a very influential demigod, and some of the *cough* higher up beings need him alive and doing what they need, since the book this is based on is based around Percy getting the lightning bolt. Them killing his mother would be a bad idea.

It seems like Luke and the tall boys are going to be the scum faction this time around.

[ghaws]

 

OK so here's the deal.

I'm Percy's mother. I needed +1 votes to be lynched yesterday. Now I need +2. I'm a town role. Every time I get saved from a lynch the required amount of votes to lynch me increases.

You need 8 or 5 at deadline to lynch me now.

I'm pretty sure MK is an anti town role since he's leading hard to get me lynched.

Percy’s mother having that kind of modifier makes sense, since Percy is a very influential demigod, and some of the *cough* higher up beings need him alive and doing what they need, since the book this is based on is based around Percy getting the lightning bolt. Them killing his mother would be a bad idea.

It seems like Luke and the tall boys are going to be the scum faction this time around.

 

Alright since i know velocity knows about the lore and rafay admitted to not knowing the lore i think having this kind of surety is pretty good so in my mind i think rafay is off the hook for now

[Rafay]

Alright since i know velocity knows about the lore and rafay admitted to not knowing the lore i think having this kind of surety is pretty good so in my mind i think rafay is off the hook for now

 

Thank you. 

[Wolfpacks]

I dont feel MK is scum but then nor do I feel anything from Rafay,

[Lyner]

I can believe Rafay's RC

[Tony Maurice]

vote wolfpacks

[brewersalliance]

Vote Torres

For mod killing me

Fuck you 12 yr old bitch
I'm drink
I'm drink

[Tony Maurice]

HE DRKNK HE DRINK 

[Lord MK]

He's not Percy's mother.
If it's a real RC, we would have gotten a name, instead of Percy's mother.


If anything, that's a safe claim.

Well, screw you. We are going to lynch you. We are going to get 8.

Vote: Lord MK

He did the same thing last game. Got me lynched and crippled the town and then won as mafia. Lynch him

I didn't do no such thing.
You were killed by Nadarr in that game.
Liar.

By the rule of Lynch All Liars, i say we lynch him

[Wolfpacks]

vote wolfpacks

Any reason for the vote

[Rafay]

He's not Percy's mother. If it's a real RC, we would have gotten a name, instead of Percy's mother. If anything, that's a safe claim.

 

I replied w/o looking at my role PM. Its Sally Jackson. 

[The Warrior]

Rafay’s claim would be a strange one to make up.

HE DRKNK HE DRINK

I laughed pretty hard at this.

[KevinH]

as the late great Kevin would say, somebody knows something.

Thanks for the "great" but hopefully in this game, I won't be "late" anytime soon.

I believe Rafay.

Vote: Lord MK

[Tony Maurice]

 

vote wolfpacks

Any reason for the vote

 

Not really

I think MK is doing his distraction play again. He could be jester too.

[Rafay]

I believe Rafay.

 

Thank you Kevin. 

[lilweirdward]

Alright I went back and read a few pages, and there are a few things that stood out:

- Kevin making up numbers to justify voting for brewers. Brewers was convinced that this was a scum tell, and while I don't really buy it, brewers is obviously a good player and has a good scum sense.

- MK being weird about getting Rafay lynched even though he has made a valid town claim. Did this in the other game and turned out scum. I feel like he's just being misleading for whatever reason because it feels too obvious.

- ghaws hasn't really posted a ton, and most of his actions have just been following along with the crowd, e.g. only voting Rafay after I threatened to be suspicious of people who didn't vote (and to hammer him at 4 votes). Granted I think he's just a new player but it's hard to tell which newbie read is more accurate.

- Nadarr/Tony v2 justified voting for brewers but didn't actually commit a vote, which is pretty scummy. I can't read Tony v2 though. The WP vote seems odd.

For now I'm gonna go with:

Vote: Kevin

He's been pretty vote happy and not really been putting much work into justifying any of his votes. I'm gonna trust brewers' gut for now.

[KevinH]

I'm only refuting this claim. 

I think I'm the most obvious town ever. Adding a scum would completely unbalance the game

 

 
It could go either way, but is certainly not "most obvious town ever" nor would it "completely unbalance" the game.

 
 

Vote: Wolfpacks
 
for low activity

 
 

as the late great Kevin would say, somebody knows something.

Thanks for the "great" but hopefully in this game, I won't be "late" anytime soon.

I believe Rafay.

Vote: Lord MK

 
 

- Kevin making up numbers to justify voting for brewers. Brewers was convinced that this was a scum tell, and while I don't really buy it, brewers is obviously a good player and has a good scum sense.

...

For now I'm gonna go with:

Vote: Kevin

He's been pretty vote happy and not really been putting much work into justifying any of his votes. I'm gonna trust brewers' gut for now.

I dispute this. If you don't know my reasoning for my votes, you aren't paying attention.

[lilweirdward]

Lol I never said you don't have any reasons, but that you're not really working through any logic behind them. Just kind of throwing votes at seemingly obvious targets. Let's take your last MK vote as an example. I included him in my suspicious list, so obviously I have an idea of why someone might vote for him, but you didn't really give any justification for why you specifically think he should be lynched today. Suggesting that I'm the one at fault for pointing out that you're making low effort votes instead of reading good intentions into your posts is super scummy and actually makes me more confident of my vote.