866 replies to this topic

[Finster Baby]

 

Tony would be stupid to kill LWW. I think mafia are trying to frame him.

Tony ended d1 4 days early, so Tony isn't the best authority when it comes to smart decisions.

 

This.  Tony had no situational awareness when he voted.  Just because most of us were for NL doesn't mean it had to happen 4 days early.  While not as critical D1, what if this had been later and that last vote was the hammer vote and now a townie is dead? 

 

Gotta pay attention.  I'm not yet inclined to vote for Tony because of it, but I sure not happy about what he did.

[ghaws]

There is something which is bugging me from when i saw tony vote for a no lynch if there was in need of another day why didn't someone just unvote that way it wouldn't had reached a majority right or is it a rule that once majority is reached no matter what the day ends? 

[The Warrior]

Now, something i have been thinking of.
If you don't RC immediately, and instead wait another night.
And stay on the same target, if you Tracked first night, then motion detection the next night and vice versa and you catch them visiting the night kill target again.
Then it's in all likelihood, scum.

If they visit anyone else, then they are joat.
If they don't visit anyone, then they are scum, this time they are not carrying out the kill.
In order to maximize their potential, Joats should be using actions every night.
So anyone who was seen visiting anyone on one night and not visiting anyone the next night, is pretty much guaranteed to be scum.

This sounds reasonable to me.

And as suggested yesterday I think we need to “force” everyone to vote for someone today and maybe even give some sort of actual reason for their vote. Granted, the reasoning will be highly limited and may just be gut feeling but that will at least give us more to analyze than just “Vote: Player X”.

[Lyner]

 

And as suggested yesterday I think we need to “force” everyone to vote for someone today and maybe even give some sort of actual reason for their vote. Granted, the reasoning will be highly limited and may just be gut feeling but that will at least give us more to analyze than just “Vote: Player X”.

 

Let's do it

 

Vote: Robert

[Torres951]

Tony ended d1 4 days early, so Tony isn't the best authority when it comes to smart decisions.

Welcome to the club Tony   

[Ferastical]

There is something which is bugging me from when i saw tony vote for a no lynch if there was in need of another day why didn't someone just unvote that way it wouldn't had reached a majority right or is it a rule that once majority is reached no matter what the day ends? 

 

yes, certain amount of no-lynch votes = day ends immediately

[ghaws]

 

There is something which is bugging me from when i saw tony vote for a no lynch if there was in need of another day why didn't someone just unvote that way it wouldn't had reached a majority right or is it a rule that once majority is reached no matter what the day ends? 

 

yes, certain amount of no-lynch votes = day ends immediately

 

even if we unvote?

 

 

 

[Rafay]

Let's do it   Vote: Robert

 

Vote: Robert2424 

[Tony Maurice]

Ending the day early also gave scum less time to kill the best player. Benefitted us more than them.

[Robert2424]

Random Wagons are Random. 

 

Vote Brewers

[The Warrior]

Ending the day early also gave scum less time to kill the best player. Benefitted us more than them.

How do you figure that? The scum kill at night. Ending the day early doesn’t affect them negatively in any way.

[Lord MK]

I think tw said that a reason alongside the vote is expected.
Whereas every vote since has been everything except that.
..

Ending the day early also gave scum less time to kill the best player. Benefitted us more than them.

How do you figure that? The scum kill at night. Ending the day early doesn’t affect them negatively in any way.

Exactly, if anything, ending early benefitted scum more than anything.

[KevinH]

Once a majority is reached, whether on a player or on no-lynch, it's too late to unvote.

 

Vote Count:

Robert2424 (2): Lyner, Rafay, 
Tony Maurice (1): Lord MK, 
brewersalliance (1): Robert2424, 
Rafay (0):
Finster Baby (0):
Ali bin Turban (0):
Ferastical (0):
ghaws (0):
Lord MK (0):
Lyner (0):
The Warrior (0):
Torres951 (0):
Velocity (0):
Wolfpacks (0):

No Lynch (0):

 

Not Voting: The Warrior, Finster Baby, Ferastical, Ali bin Turban, brewersalliance, Velocity, ghaws, Wolfpacks, Torres951, Tony Maurice,

With 14 alive it takes 8 to lynch, or 4 at deadline.
Deadline is Saturday, August 29 at 23:59 EDT.

[ghaws]

Once a majority is reached, whether on a player or on no-lynch, it's too late to unvote.

 

 

thanks for the clarification really appreciate that!

[ghaws]

And why isn't anyone discussing the death of lww? 

is everyone just certain that the scum is trying to frame the group that lww was having an argument against? 

[Robert2424]

It's believed to be a more a frame then random or thought he was a JOAT. 

 

There is ALLOT of players. Though I personally doubt the reasoning for targeting LWW was simply framing. 

[Wolfpacks]

VOTE rafay

Well why not if its all random

[Tony Maurice]

What about me 

[The Warrior]

What about me 

How does ending the day early hurt the scum more than the town?

[Tony Maurice]

 

What about me 

How does ending the day early hurt the scum more than the town?

 

it doesn't.