866 replies to this topic

[Finster Baby]

Vote FB because its been a while

VOTE:  Wolfpacks

 

Because OMGUS.

[KevinH]

In every game I mod, all roles are assigned randomly.

Vote Count:

Lyner (2): brewersalliance, Lord MK,  
Rafay (1): Lyner, 
brewersalliance (1): Robert2424, 
Robert2424 (1): Rafay, 
Ferastical (1): Tony Maurice,
ghaws (1): Torres951,
Finster Baby (1): Wolfpacks,
Wolfpacks (1): Finster Baby,
Tony Maurice (0): 
Ali bin Turban (0):
Lord MK (0):
The Warrior (0):
Torres951 (0):
Velocity (0):

No Lynch (0):

 

Not Voting: The Warrior, Velocity, ghaws, Ali bin Turban, Ferastical,

With 14 alive it takes 8 to lynch, or 4 at deadline.
Deadline is Saturday, August 29 at 23:59 EDT.
 

[ghaws]

Oo okay I thought it wasn't random sorry my bad!

[Lord MK]

Arrgh, too many posts to quote.

First one.
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Numbers,_Part_1
Says clearly there, odd numbers for town wins games.
So definitely not a liar.
And 93 percent chance It's scum.
But to the Joat investigating, from their perspective, it can be either.
You are just being a bottom dwelling troll now.

Another one to ghaws.
You comment that Kevin won't give you the role is baseless.
All roles and alignment are decided by RNG.
So everyone here had an equal chance of being mafia or joats.
Actually almost all mafia games played here are decided by RNG

[ghaws]

Yea it is my bad I really thought it was based on the mod whom they want to assign which role and I accept that mistake will keep this in mind thanks for pointing it out

[Wolfpacks]

Vote FB because its been a while

VOTE: Wolfpacks

Because OMGUS.

I know lol

[Robert2424]

 

 

How is it digging? That’s a recent game fresh in memory.

 

 

That's not changing a strategy, that's having two entirely different philosophies and directly contradicting oneself

What, so you don't think people can change?

Going digging in other game threads to fill gaps in your scum reads might just be the most sus thing I've seen yet, or is it something that is done often? Either way, can't stand it.

It's not digging.
It was a recent game.
Besides, some people here will not believe anything without proof.
And thus the accused will dismiss it without proof.

I don't know about you, but going into another game thread to find a one-sentence post from like 2 months back, and specifically linking to it definitely fits my definition of digging. And yes, you may say it's a "recent game" and such, but I can barely remember what I had for lunch 2 days ago, how's Brewers supposed to remember what a person posted in a forum mafia game 2 months back? lol
And hey, if he somehow did, props to him. Good memory.

But as it so happens that you're all so cool about it, how about this...

Brewers, remember this post? https://ironcentral.org/community/topic/64644-tw-12-agents-of-shield-mafia-hydra-wins/?p=1006043

If you're, and I quote, always trying to lynch on D1... then congratulations, you're 100% contradicting yourself here.

Lol wait so shame on me for remembering players past actions from other games? And considering I said I never vote no Lynch in this game and straight up pointed out how I don't ever do this, and then proceeded to give an explaintion several times for why the change of heart for this game, you are grasping at straws here. If I just changed my entire philosophy with no reasoning at all and then after I was called out for it started to make excuses **cough cough what lyner did cough cough** that would be one thing. But that's not even remotely what happened. And u know it
So congratulations, im 0% contradicting myself

Its a Theory for me after seeing the death last night honestly TW.

Are u claiming you're a JOAT and saw the death of LWW at night?

 

If I was going to claim that, I would of claimed right away once I had information. 

 

My Vote is based off entirely who was killed. So I only have a short list. But I have suspects. 

[Lyner]

Vote: FB

 

reasons mentioned

[Ali bin Turban]

Arrgh, too many posts to quote.

First one.
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Numbers,_Part_1
Says clearly there, odd numbers for town wins games.
So definitely not a liar.
And 93 percent chance It's scum.
But to the Joat investigating, from their perspective, it can be either.
You are just being a bottom dwelling troll now.

I see your mistake. You've trusted wiki numbers without checking them. They're wrong and one can feel it intuitively just by looking at them.

Lets have the simplest case of odd number from the wiki: 5 players with 1scum.
Towns initial chance of nailing scum on D1 is 20%.
If they miss game's reduced to 3 players with 1 scum, so towns chances on D2 are 33%. If they miss they loose.
To sum up chance for the town to win is 20% + 80%*33% = 46,67%

This is exactly the same as with 6 players ( and it should be) because 6 players open with no lynch.
Numbers on the page are wrong because for each setup no lynch is assumed ( and in fact if you open 5:1 game with no lynch you have just 25% chance of winning the game)

About trolling accusation I'm seriously speechless. The fact that there are 2 outcomes for JOAT does not make them equally probable. Like the fact, that you can get robbed while going for groceries doesn't make it equally probable as getting home in one piece.

Why pointing out true probabilities is trolling for you I dont even dear to imagine.

[Lord MK]

You being a troll is not due to that.
You were resorting to personal attacks, basically last resorts of trolls.

[Tony Maurice]

Ooh, I see finster often but I like the trend

 

vote- finster

[Ali bin Turban]

You being a troll is not due to that.
You were resorting to personal attacks, basically last resorts of trolls.

And where exactly did it happen? Which part of my comment was a personnal attack?

[Ali bin Turban]

Well, actually it does not matter.
MK if you felt something I said was a personal attack, then please accept my apologies. It was not my intention to do it.

[ghaws]

Yo torres you haven't been speaking much in this game guess you do not want the top post spot?

[brewersalliance]

Yo torres you haven't been speaking much in this game guess you do not want the top post spot?

speaking of post counts...

 

Member name Posts brewersalliance 44 Lord MK 34 Tony Maurice 31 lilweirdward 28 Ali bin Turban 27 ghaws 23 Ferastical 22 Lyner 22 KevinH 19 Finster Baby 19 The Warrior 19 Robert2424 14 Torres951 12 Wolfpacks 8 Velocity 7 Rafay

5

 

 

@Rafay do you plan on contributing at all to this game or?

[Torres951]

Yo torres you haven't been speaking much in this game guess you do not want the top post spot?

I like to lurk in the background, thank you very much

[KevinH]

Vote Count:

Finster Baby (3): Wolfpacks, Lyner, Tony Maurice,
Lyner (2): brewersalliance, Lord MK,  
brewersalliance (1): Robert2424, 
Robert2424 (1): Rafay, 
ghaws (1): Torres951,
Wolfpacks (1): Finster Baby,
Ferastical (0):
Rafay (0):  
Tony Maurice (0): 
Ali bin Turban (0):
Lord MK (0):
The Warrior (0):
Torres951 (0):
Velocity (0):

No Lynch (0):

 

Not Voting: The Warrior, Velocity, ghaws, Ali bin Turban, Ferastical,

With 14 alive it takes 8 to lynch, or 4 at deadline.
Deadline is Saturday, August 29 at 23:59 EDT.
 

[Finster Baby]

UNVOTE

 

VOTE:  RAFAY

 

I'm all in favor of eliminating inactives unless they start participating.

[Lord MK]

So wp, and Tony.
Why are you voting for Finster again?

I get lyner's reason.

WP's vote is a fluff vote.
And Tony is well, Tony.

He's at DL-1.


The only sensible vote atm, is indeed Rafay.
Velocity has atleast given a reason for his absence.
WP is a serial lurker.

Rafay hasn't shown up at all recently, in any of the games being played.


And the other reasonable option is Tony.
Cause of his rather careless actions.
That being said,

Vote: Rafay.

[Velocity]

Yo torres you haven't been speaking much in this game guess you do not want the top post spot?

speaking of post counts...
Member name Posts brewersalliance 44 Lord MK 34 Tony Maurice 31 lilweirdward 28 Ali bin Turban 27 ghaws 23 Ferastical 22 Lyner 22 KevinH 19 Finster Baby 19 The Warrior 19 Robert2424 14 Torres951 12 Wolfpacks 8 Velocity 7 Rafay
5


@Rafay do you plan on contributing at all to this game or?

Truthfully I can’t get to the game until most people have already said most of what can be said about something that somebody else says.

If I see something else I can contribute, or something that many people may have missed, I will pitch in, but in the earlier days it’s mostly just waiting to see who comes out ahead as scummy.