866 replies to this topic

[Rafay]

Tony Maurice (7): brewersalliance, Lord MK, Finster Baby, Ferastical, ghaws, The Warrior, Tony Maurice,

 

Well well well. Looking forward to 7 explanations.

 

We're lucky that the mafia are either incompetent or someone successfully blocked. 

[Finster Baby]

Tony Maurice (7): brewersalliance, Lord MK, Finster Baby, Ferastical, ghaws, The Warrior, Tony Maurice,

 
Well well well. Looking forward to 7 explanations.
 
We're lucky that the mafia are either incompetent or someone successfully blocked.

Not Voting: Velocity, Rafay, Wolfpacks,

How about you start on why you felt you didn't need to vote???

My guess is one of the JOATs guessed correctly last night. Good show, we needed that.

[brewersalliance]

In before robert votes for me for "theories"

[Lord MK]

Well well, peaceful night.

[Lyner]

Thoughts on who mafias chose & our JoAT protected last night?

 

That's 3 confirmed town if JoATs claim right now

 

What's the optimal strategy?

[Robert2424]

Well, I'm somebody could make a point scale on who was likely targeted. but yeah. I think JOAT did protect somebody correctly. Witch may or may not give us information. However, this may also indicate if a successful block wasn't done, inactive mafia. It'll be impossible to know unless that same JOAT discovers Scum, in witch case, maybe we can look into it more. 

 

Tony did turn up town. Though, him thrusting himself into the spotlight to end Day 1 and 2 early would really be a good move by either Town or Mafia. Maybe Slightly worse if he was mafia. Although, its hard to say who JOAT's would of protected. 

 

we had a few wagons yesterday, and a lynch of a town, 3 non voters as well. 

 

For Non voters, Rafay is the most surprising to me. 

 

Out of options, Town will likely vote off an inactive, cause unless JOAT comes forward, nobody is going willing to take a risk and take a stand. So probably Wolfpacks and Velocity will be targeted today by people to be lynched. If not, prove me wrong. 

[ghaws]

Well well well. Looking forward to 7 explanations.

 

If you want an explanation from my side all i will say is i was not sure until the very end but once someone is questioned about why they made a specific statement and their defence is "nope" that is something which titled me, yea i agreee he could be tired from all the explaining he had to do but that does not change the fact that he literally had no defence

[Ferastical]

Well well well. Looking forward to 7 explanations.

 

Come on, it's not like we had a better alternative... since you've been a little inactive I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and guess that you haven't fully caught up with the situation and all the posts yet. Tony unfortunately did not contribute to the Town's cause. Obviously, hindsight is 20/20, but what did you expect of us yesterday?

 

Nicely done, JOAT.

[Velocity]

Yeah, I can’t blame y’all for lynching Tony. He dug himself a hole, pretty much any town would lynch him over another candidate in a situation like that.

Nice job by the JOAT(s)

[Ali bin Turban]

Tony was too easy target to be scum. If he was one, then after his first blunder he'd be surely coached by his team not to do it again.

Still being a town and a premiere target ( if Im not mistaken he tied with other wagon only for a moment) created a comfortable situation for the scum, since they were not in a danger of getting lynched, so they were not forced to vote.

So right now I'm leaning towards taking a look at those, that didn't participate. Even though we all know that we must vote in order to win.

Rafay, Velocity, Wolfpacks, we all know the excuse for voting on Tony, whats your excuse for not voting at all?
Also Velocity why dont you want to blame anyone for lynching Tony? Were there some of your pals on the wagon?

[Lyner]

Yesterday's wagon is very convenient to join for scums I'd bet there are at least two scums here:

 

Tony Maurice (7): brewersalliance, Lord MK, Finster Baby, Ferastical, ghaws, The Warrior, Tony Maurice,

 

[Velocity]

Tony was too easy target to be scum. If he was one, then after his first blunder he'd be surely coached by his team not to do it again.

Still being a town and a premiere target ( if Im not mistaken he tied with other wagon only for a moment) created a comfortable situation for the scum, since they were not in a danger of getting lynched, so they were not forced to vote.

So right now I'm leaning towards taking a look at those, that didn't participate. Even though we all know that we must vote in order to win.

Rafay, Velocity, Wolfpacks, we all know the excuse for voting on Tony, whats your excuse for not voting at all?
Also Velocity why dont you want to blame anyone for lynching Tony? Were there some of your pals on the wagon?

I didn’t vote because my dog died, and I was focusing on things that weren’t mafia. Same reason why I was immune to lynching yesterday.

I don’t blame people, because Tony was going to end up a detriment to town rather than an asset with his habits and literally just saying “nope” in response to asking if he had a defense.

[Ali bin Turban]

Oh, right. You had a valid reason not to participate.

Still, there are more than one person here, that have playstle thats detrimental to town. If we go lynching them with that excuse we'll loose every game.

[Wolfpacks]

I wasnt inactive I just choose not to vote, looked like my choice was right, so before you choose to lynch a so called inactive I suggest you look closely at the 7 who did vote first

[Ali bin Turban]

I wasnt inactive I just choose not to vote, looked like my choice was right, so before you choose to lynch a so called inactive I suggest you look closely at the 7 who did vote first

If you're town, then you can't sit and wait for the results. You're part of investigation team. So what do you see, when you look closely at those 7?

[brewersalliance]

Yesterday's wagon is very convenient to join for scums I'd bet there are at least two scums here:

Tony Maurice (7): brewersalliance, Lord MK, Finster Baby, Ferastical, ghaws, The Warrior, Tony Maurice,

Scum typically don't like to be at the begining or end of a wagon, they usually like to slide in the middle

I do agree with lyner that we probably have one or two scum on this wagon. My guess would be one since there really wasn't any danger of someone not named tony being lynched.

With that being said, I'd be willing to wager one of MK, Finster, Ferastical or ghaws is a scum

Velocity wasn't allowed to vote per kevin, but that also doesn't mean he isn't scum.

Shout out to our joat doctor. Good work. Plz don't take credit lol
Rafay not voting kind of bothers me

He tends to do that quite often when he is scum. He sits on the sidelines and doesn't vote. As town Rafay usually just votes someone and doesn't really explain why.

Wolfpacks has been very quiet this game but that's also per usual for him

[ghaws]

I can see why I am being suspected but I think I already gave my reason I just didn't like the way he was defending himself seemed suspicious to me at that moment

[Rafay]

First of all I am not going to provide an "excuse" because only wrong doers make "excuses".

 

My "reasoning" is that I didn't think he was guilty so I didn't feel the need to lynch out a townie unlike you 7 trigger happy murderers.

[Lord MK]

Brewers, How am i in the middle of the wagon?
I am like the second person on the wagon and i pushed for it more than you.
And you know why i voted for Tony. He was a prick.

And rafay, you have no right to accuse us of being trigger happy, especially with your history of doing what Tony did this game every other game.

Vote: Rafay

[Rafay]

Ding ding looks like we're on to something. Why so angry MK. I didn't accuse you yet...