866 replies to this topic

[brewersalliance]

Just an FYI I'm going to be out of town until Tuesday. Don't know how much I'll be able to get on. I'll try my best

[Lyner]

As predicted scums are taking the easy route. Yesterday was Tony and today it is Rafay. 

 

Deadline is 15 Sept, start voting people.

 

Tony Maurice (7): brewersalliance, Lord MK, Finster Baby, Ferastical, ghaws, The Warrior, Tony Maurice,

 

 

Out of all these people, I'd bet MK is one of our scum.

 

Vote: MK

[Finster Baby]

If somebody knows somethin, maybe it's time they spilled what they know.  We're still grasping at straws here on D4.

[Robert2424]

Well. How bout I stir the pot even more. I wouldn't of be the least bit surprised if scum tried to kill me or Velocity last night as it fit there agenda and profile of scum I've been talking about.

Considering everyone believe last night kill was saved, somebody followed evidenced and predicted somebody would likely been targeted, or is mathamaticly seriously lucky.

[Velocity]

Well. How bout I stir the pot even more. I wouldn't of be the least bit surprised if scum tried to kill me or Velocity last night as it fit there agenda and profile of scum I've been talking about.

Considering everyone believe last night kill was saved, somebody followed evidenced and predicted somebody would likely been targeted, or is mathamaticly seriously lucky.

I would hope they didn’t try to kill me last night, that would have been a douche move.

A save last night is the only viable option I can see. I doubt that scum would forget to enter a night kill, unless they were all super inactive players.

[Robert2424]

Has everyone posted today? Can we get a post count for today actually vs a post count in general?

[Lord MK]

Rafay was lynched, as he deserved.
I'm happy. Lol

Unvote.

.

Tony Maurice (7): brewersalliance, Lord MK, Finster Baby, Ferastical, ghaws, The Warrior, Tony Maurice,

Out of all these people, I'd bet MK is one of our scum.

Vote: MK

You just really want to lynch me for once, don't you?

[Lord MK]

Lyner, weren't you the one who accused brewers, Finster, me and tw of being scum? That's 4 people, btw.
Your FoS targets are all people who have caught you numerous times, yet you never been able to.

You have been throwing accusations left and right without any reasons.

Why is exactly you behave every time you are scum
Which is how you behaved in the infamous greening game of tw, and we caught you even then.
And you have acted like Rafay every time you are scum.

And thus,
Vote: Lyner

[ghaws]

Rafay was lynched, as he deserved. I'm happy. Lol

 

he was not even scum lol

[Lord MK]

Rafay was lynched, as he deserved. I'm happy. Lol

he was not even scum lol

Your point?
I was just serving my own personal agenda, lol

[ghaws]

no no i just found it funny that he got lynched mostly because you helped lol

[Velocity]

Rafay was lynched, as he deserved. I'm happy. Lol

he was not even scum lol

Your point?
I was just serving my own personal agenda, lol

To be fair “personal agenda” equaling “townie dying” isn’t a great look. I know you just wanted to lynch him because that’s you, but it’s not great.

[ghaws]

Your point?

 

and also i won the game because u helped him lynch lmao

[Lord MK]

Rafay was lynched, as he deserved. I'm happy. Lol

he was not even scum lol

Your point?
I was just serving my own personal agenda, lol

To be fair “personal agenda” equaling “townie dying” isn’t a great look. I know you just wanted to lynch him because that’s you, but it’s not great.

But i was right about all the Scum, except ghaws.
I didn't even know someone with that name existed, lol.

Rafay was lynched, as he deserved. I'm happy. Lol

he was not even scum lol

Your point?
I was just serving my own personal agenda, lol

To be fair “personal agenda” equaling “townie dying” isn’t a great look. I know you just wanted to lynch him because that’s you, but it’s not great.

Wait wait, how is that not a great look on me?
I'm dead in that game and that game is over.
Yes, I did my initial vote in this game to help push the lynch along.
But that had nothing to do with this game.
So it's not a good look or a bad look, there's no "look", in fact.

[Velocity]

Rafay was lynched, as he deserved. I'm happy. Lol

he was not even scum lol

Your point?
I was just serving my own personal agenda, lol

To be fair “personal agenda” equaling “townie dying” isn’t a great look. I know you just wanted to lynch him because that’s you, but it’s not great.

But i was right about all the Scum, except ghaws.
I didn't even know someone with that name existed, lol.

I knew ghaws was one of the scum, I just didn’t press hard enough.

No more nice Velocity lmao
If I know something imma use it

[The Warrior]

Sorry again about my relative inactivity. There is all sorts of stuff going on irl for me right now.

To address a few things that have been said today so far:

First off, I don’t think anyone needs to actually justify why they voted for Tony. His actions warranted the votes against him. I’m not surprised he ended up being town but he also deserved the votes he got based off of in game actions. Having said that, there probably was at least one scum in there somewhere but this would also be an easy place for the majority of scum to stay away from while town kills town.

Secondly, Rafay calling out the 7 people who voted for Tony and asking for justification from us all is again, ridiculous. He earned his votes.

Thirdly, There is very little reason why scum wouldn’t have killed on given night with the low odds of a town JOAT catching someone in the process so it’s likely that at least one of our JOAT’s uses a protective action last night. So if that was you, you probably know who at least one more townie is today. I advise sitting on that knowledge unless absolutely necessary to save that person in line for a lynch or until we’re in a LYLO situation or something.

[Lord MK]

But there's another possibility you didn't consider.
Say, 1st Joat saves a VT.
On the same night, the 2nd Joat could have used doc action on a mafia goon.
So yes, they are probably townie.
But that doesn't mean we should exonerate them completely.

Also there's something else that i have just confirmed with Kevin.

The motion detection action result message in case of a positive hit.
"Actions were performed either by or on that player"
What that means is,
1st Joat uses motion detection on player A.

2nd Joat uses any action on player A
Or Player A commits a kill. Or both.
Or player A is the other Joat.

The same message would be sent to the 1st Joat, in all these cases.

[Wolfpacks]

But there's another possibility you didn't consider.
Say, 1st Joat saves a VT.
On the same night, the 2nd Joat could have used doc action on a mafia goon.
So yes, they are probably townie.
But that doesn't mean we should exonerate them completely.

Also there's something else that i have just confirmed with Kevin.

The motion detection action result message in case of a positive hit.
"Actions were performed either by or on that player"
What that means is,
1st Joat uses motion detection on player A.

2nd Joat uses any action on player A
Or Player A commits a kill. Or both.
Or player A is the other Joat.

The same message would be sent to the 1st Joat, in all these cases.

Sounds interesting

[The Warrior]

It is possible that a JOAT protected a Scum but that wouldn’t block a kill anyway. Scum aren’t going to kill scum.

[Velocity]

It is possible that a JOAT protected a Scum but that wouldn’t block a kill anyway. Scum aren’t going to kill scum.

I believe what MK means is that if both JOATs used a Doctor ability the same night, there’s a chance one of the JOATs used it on a person who didn’t get attacked, so without a way to check who actually saved the attempted target for kill we couldn’t exonerate either of them.

It would help their case, but not exonerate.