1065 replies to this topic

[junkahoolik]

What do you mean pushing for your lynch the most??? There are others that wanted to lynch you more than I. I only told that you're suspicious. It's not my fault that right now you're acting quite scummy. I haven't even voted for you...

Also I'm guessing you really want me to get lynched even since day one. You've stated thrice that you feel that I'm scum or something. The only thing I know that I've done wrong was the OMGUS at the beginning but still I believe it's not a good reason for lynching me. Perhaps if you're really scum, your scum mates told you how noob I am at this game and it would be easy for you to lynch me.

not just that kazio... i counted that falzis helped you 3 times already. so if he is scum, there is a high probability that you are too.

also, welcome Aquinas!!

[Kaziocore]

not just that kazio... i counted that falzis helped you 3 times already. so if he is scum, there is a high probability that you are too.

also, welcome Aquinas!!

Or he could be just like EM like last game...

And what do you mean 3 times already. I thought it was only when I voted for you on D1.

[angel of doom]

unvote

that got ppl talking also if you check the wiki it says docs generally cant protect themselves, its not common but not unheard of

[Falzis]

Or he could be just like EM like last game...

And what do you mean 3 times already. I thought it was only when I voted for you on D1.

Yes I only defended Kazio once. Why is there a persistent attempt to misrep things?

[CanucksDynasty]

unvote

that got ppl talking also if you check the wiki it says docs generally cant protect themselves, its not common but not unheard of

True...it does say that.
Also since Narsis is modding the game, I don't know if he threw in a twist or not (ie. talking after majority lynch is made but before death scene). His modding style and games are different than moles (ie. his Streets of Detroit game).

[CanucksDynasty]

Hahaha elow Aquinas!!

So ok it's really 3 for a half majority I read it wrong. But the claim is still incredulous.

Told ya so

[CanucksDynasty]

I was sticking up for AoD up until he said he could protect himself. I've played a lot of mafia games, Mole's played a lot of mafia games, CD's played a lot of mafia games and no one has ever heard of a self protecting doctor before. This makes me think that AoD is lying about his power role and is most likely scum. The only thing that has me wondering is why he voted for himself. It seems like he jumped the gun on the role claim when he felt the pressure, so it's likely that his self vote is a last ditch effort to save his own skin.

Is it enough for you to put a vote on him?

[CanucksDynasty]

For my purposes...

KevinH Townies
Falzis
Sir Jesus

Townies (my gut feeling)
Aquinas - replaced CV so most likely vanilla townie.
Junkahoolik
mole

Undecided
Theopolis
Kaziocore

Who I think are probably scum
Electric Mango
angel of doom

[CanucksDynasty]

i've had some time to consider the possible outcomes.

1.) we dont lynch kevinH and he turns out to be a power role, he helps us.

2.) we dont lynch KevinH and he turns out to be scum, and if the doc decides to help him the doc will end up dead and we'll be down 3 people before the 2nd day even starts.(lynch, doc, and the mafia target)

3.) we lynch him and he's a power role. doesnt cripple the town but does hurt none the less.

with that in mind

unvote
vote:KevinH

the chances of loosing more ppl than needed is to high to risk not lynching you.

This just sticks out to me.
You came up with the theory of a weak doc eventhough you roleclaim as a doc.
Why would you suggest a weak doc if you knew the description of the doc role.

When asked to paraphase you role you said this...

i dont know what the success rate for a self protect is, it was never mentioned in the pm, all it said was i had the ability to protect others or if i choose myself, i'm assuming its a random chance of success or failure

You didn't even mention that you could get killed if you protected scum (as a weak doc).
Also why would you assume you would have a random chance of success or failure?

I gave you the benefit of the doubt to explain yourself but the noose around your neck keeps getting tighter and tighter.

Unvote: Electric Mango
Vote: angel of doom

[Falzis]

Oh damn that puts the nail in the coffin. I forgot about that.

[Sir Jesus]

No, AoD currently sits at 4 votes.

This pisses me off to no end.

[Falzis]

I didn't mean nail as in he's dead. I just meant CD's insight reinforces his scuminess.

[CanucksDynasty]

No, AoD currently sits at 4 votes.

This pisses me off to no end.

Why does this piss you off?

[junkahoolik]

No, AoD currently sits at 4 votes.

This pisses me off to no end.

i second his question...

[junkahoolik]

also, falzis, you're right... you only stood up for kazio 2 times


post 60 strongly against mole

and post 82 as a response to me

[angel of doom]

and when in any game has a weak doc been told that he was a weak doc? a weak doc would be under the assumption that he is a regular doc. also when i asked about a possible doc death i didnt know there was even such thing as a weak doc.

[CanucksDynasty]

and when in any game has a weak doc been told that he was a weak doc? a weak doc would be under the assumption that he is a regular doc. also when i asked about a possible doc death i didnt know there was even such thing as a weak doc.

Umm...in mole's hospital game (the previous game played)...it has a description of what the Weak Doc was and I'm pretty sure Narsis (who was the weak doc in that game) got all the info (even the part about dying if he protected the wrong guy). Since Narsis is modding this game...I think he would know to put that kind of info in the role description.

I'll grant that you probably don't know what a weak doc is since you didn't play mole's hospital game.

BUT the possible doc death was one of your main reasons for lynching KevinH. You stated it would be better to lynch KevinH rather and be 2 down instead of 3 down. Also...why would you assume you would die if you protected scum? Was there any hint of that in your role description? I don't think so...thus my vote on you remains.

[angel of doom]

like i said i didnt know i had to be a weak doc to die from protecting scum. if i had i wouldnt have even brought that theory to the table

[Sir Jesus]

Why does this piss you off?

Because you guys have some awful desire to immediately lynch anyone that hints at their abilities. Just because someone is lying to you doesn't mean they're not on your side. Frankly I'm pissed that nobody has the insight to recognize this, and that EM keeps getting closer to safety as the deadline approaches.

[junkahoolik]

Because you guys have some awful desire to immediately lynch anyone that hints at their abilities. Just because someone is lying to you doesn't mean they're not on your side. Frankly I'm pissed that nobody has the insight to recognize this, and that EM keeps getting closer to safety as the deadline approaches.

i thought the basic rule of thumb in mafia is lynch all liars... since townies wouldn't need to lie and even if they would lie they would screw things up... so what's with this part??

Just because someone is lying to you doesn't mean they're not on your side