1469 replies to this topic

[CanucksDynasty]

Bah, I needed a good re-read. CD posted right after Martino voted for me...blindness!

Ah, but thank you for defending me (him) back then.

You definitely need to do some more re-reading since I didn't post right after Martino voted for you.
Falzis, Narsis, and Martino had posted after Martino's vote...yet you for some reason voted for me.

On Feb 4th...I first voted for Martino and then subsequently unvoted.
On Feb 5th...Falzis voted for you.
On Feb 6th...Martino voted for you.


@EM, Narsis, and Aquinas - what are your thoughts so far with regards to 2 votes on AKCPLUTO?

[Narsis]

i do think they are...well placed. it's either him or Falzis...although still trying to figure out which...

[Narsis]

i do think they are...well placed. it's either him or Falzis...although still trying to figure out which...

EBWOP: it could also be him and Falzis.

[Falzis]

I don't know what's taking so long for other people to come in, chime their thoughts, and vote. There's nothing new that could be added to the discussion.

I give CD plus points for voting and unvoting subsequently. I'm not liking the activity from EM or Aquinas.

I've long voted for Sinkon/AKC. I don't think it's a coincidence that he hasn't been lynched yet or that mafia couldn't end the day yesterday or the day before (?) given one of them was inactive.

Narsis is sure that only I or Sinkon moved to kill junkahoolic, therefore votes should be pouring in on either of us. The fact that people are not voting must mean something especially if you assume that both of us are scum. I'm sure I'm not, therefore the vote. It's as clear as day!

We need four votes. I implore Aquinas and EM to vote already. CD and Narsis, make up your mind.

[CanucksDynasty]

I don't know what's taking so long for other people to come in, chime their thoughts, and vote. There's nothing new that could be added to the discussion.

I give CD plus points for voting and unvoting subsequently. I'm not liking the activity from EM or Aquinas.

I've long voted for Sinkon/AKC. I don't think it's a coincidence that he hasn't been lynched yet or that mafia couldn't end the day yesterday or the day before (?) given one of them was inactive.

Narsis is sure that only I or Sinkon moved to kill junkahoolic, therefore votes should be pouring in on either of us. The fact that people are not voting must mean something especially if you assume that both of us are scum. I'm sure I'm not, therefore the vote. It's as clear as day!

We need four votes. I implore Aquinas and EM to vote already. CD and Narsis, make up your mind.

I'm waiting for those 2 to chime in before casting my vote.

[CanucksDynasty]

EBWOP: it could also be him and Falzis.

If it's both of them (I highly doubt it)...then it doesn't matter who you vote for then.

[Aquinas]

I doubt that both scum have votes in right now but, I wouldn't think that one of them doesn't necessarily. I think its to forward for the mafia to both have votes locked down at this point when they could have much more easily piled on after someone voted anywhere else. At this point I am most suspect of Falzis or Martino. I think we're pretty for up creek right now and I don't think there is much anyone can do. However, a combination of yesterdays night actions and the rest of the game it seems like I would find Falzis to be the most likely scum at this point.

Vote: Falzis

At this point I think we're pretty lost no matter what.

[Falzis]

Fair enough you voted, but your post looks convoluted I don't understand it especially the first sentence. You do look lost.

[Narsis]

I don't know what's taking so long for other people to come in, chime their thoughts, and vote. There's nothing new that could be added to the discussion.

I give CD plus points for voting and unvoting subsequently. I'm not liking the activity from EM or Aquinas.

I've long voted for Sinkon/AKC. I don't think it's a coincidence that he hasn't been lynched yet or that mafia couldn't end the day yesterday or the day before (?) given one of them was inactive.

Narsis is sure that only I or Sinkon moved to kill junkahoolic, therefore votes should be pouring in on either of us. The fact that people are not voting must mean something especially if you assume that both of us are scum. I'm sure I'm not, therefore the vote. It's as clear as day!

We need four votes. I implore Aquinas and EM to vote already. CD and Narsis, make up your mind.

i have not voted because i dont know which of you to vote for. i still suspect Martino or CD or being scum as well as you. however the inactive scum theory also makes sense. so i'm trying to figure out whether to go with my gut feeling or with some semblance of logic.


@Aquinas: something interesting i've noticed is that you seem to think so highly of Sinkon/AKC being townie. why is that?

[Aquinas]

I really don't. Its more that I'm just not convinced from the evidence I have seen. At first it was because SinKon was annoying which just turned into a case against him because he became inactive. I just don't see it. I'm not trying to stand up for him I just am not convinced by him.

[Falzis]

And you're convinced of me because...?

(because you're not convinced of Sinkon's / AKC so I'm scum by default?)

[Narsis]

And you're convinced of me because...?

(because you're not convinced of Sinkon's / AKC so I'm scum by default?)

yes. either you or AKC has to be scum(either that or mole really dropped the ball on my item )

[Falzis]

My question was more for Aquinas...

[Aquinas]

And you're convinced of me because...?

(because you're not convinced of Sinkon's / AKC so I'm scum by default?)

That's almost right. Actually, I think you're using AKCPluto as a scapegoat. Through that roles replacements we've have rookie players and the first one really got on people nerves. Its easy to draw conclusions about a player like that. We're looking at some pretty sneaky scum in this game and I don't think they're playing as overtly outspoken as SinKon was.

[Falzis]

Huh? So you're more willing to give him a pass for doing something negative than me who has done something positive? (I assume you would concede I have been more pro-town than him)

Oh well. Three votes left - CD, Narsis, and AKC's.

[AKCPLUTO]

Huh? So you're more willing to give him a pass for doing something negative than me who has done something positive? (I assume you would concede I have been more pro-town than him)

Oh well. Three votes left - CD, Narsis, and AKC's.

But I already voted?

[CanucksDynasty]

Huh? So you're more willing to give him a pass for doing something negative than me who has done something positive? (I assume you would concede I have been more pro-town than him)

Oh well. Three votes left - CD, Narsis, and AKC's.

That should be EM instead of AKCPLUTO.


Unofficial Vote Count:

AKCPLUTO (2) - Falzis, Martino
Falzis (1) - Aquinas
CD (1) - AKCPLUTO

Not Voting (3) - CD, Narsis, EM

[Electric Mango]

Vote: CD.

[CanucksDynasty]

Well...I was waiting to see how EM voted.
Out of all...he was the one I suspected as scum (other than Martino).
I would have voted the opposite of how he would have voted.

He voted for me instead of ACKPLUTO or Falzis.
One of them has to be mafia.

IF ACKPLUTO was townie...it would have been an easy vote for him to place it on.
EM didn't vote for Falzis cuz he really doesn't have a valid arguement for it.
If that is the case...then EM and Narsis are the other mafia since I firmly believe Aquinas is townie.


So therefore...God...hope I'm right.

Vote: ACKPLUTO

[Falzis]

No explanation for your vote EM?