AKCPLUTO

I am not committed to voting for anyone yet. As I said, I think that it is more likely that CD or Kaziocore are scum than Falzis. I have a "pinkie of suspicion" (as opposed to a Finger OS) on CD and Kaz. Not enough to vote on, but merely a hunch. Now, if more people come up with better reasons to vote for Falzis, then I'll reconsider those reasons. Hence why I basically asked who agrees with KevinH. I'm trying to stimulate conversation and see who blinks first. I want more data to work with. *Yawns* at the inactivity....

Thank you for the explanation, Narsis Well, who else is in favor of lynching Falzis then?

Exactly, I don't want to get hasty with my vote either.

@CD Oh okay...in which case, arguing from precedent...you are entitled to your opinion. @Narsis Ah...yes...I remember the humor of that film well. But I fail to understand the concept of a 'wine in front of me' vote. Is it akin to a ly-or-lo situation?

@ CD Me: Kevin, if I had to pick one of your two theories, I think the second one is much more likely, especially in light of CD's experience. CD: My current suspects are... AKCPLUTO for the bandwagon vote. How am I bandwagoning or voting? All I said that out of the two options that Kevin presented, the second one is much more likely than the other. In other words, I think that CD and Kaziocore are much more likely to be scum than Falzis, and I think that to be so because of Falzis' inactivity. However, I'm not voting, and I'm not even FOSing. I'm merely stating an opinion. @ KevinH What does the acronym WIFOM mean? @ CD (again) So it would be best not to lynch Falzis/Theophilos just yet I agree -- I don't see the point of lynching Falzis for being inactive. If Falzis is townie, then obviously, we wouldn't want to lynch a townie. If Falzis is scum, it is to our advantage that we have an inactive scum. I would rather shoot for (no pun intended) the active scum, as opposed to the inactive scum, in a 2-scum game. Anyways... the day is young...

Yeah, tough one... Kevin, if I had to pick one of your two theories, I think the second one is much more likely, especially in light of CD's experience.

Edit by way of post .... spelling .... I meant .... 'switch their vote to Falzis'.

If two people switch their vote tot Falzis, I'll switch mine.

Where is everyone?

Should be an interesting 48 hours here.

Narsis, I thought that he just wanted to post something for the sake of posting, seeing as how the topic went inactive?

Hello? Thanks for the prod.

Edit by way of post... Narsis, well, obviously, there was an issue. Would it be possible to be specific, at all? Please? If not, that's alright. The site's back up, and that's pretty much all that matters now.

Testing? Testing? What happened to the website, guys? I couldn't log in, and firefox told me that this was an attack site...hmm... Anyways....hmm....

MG, if everyone votes sooner than next Wednesday, can the votes be counted early? Of course. I count the votes essentially whenever I feel like it, so I'll be sure to get one up in a few days / if there's a flurry of activity.

Huh, I will keep that in mind, CD. Right. I agree. LOL!

Ah, the buddy-buddy thing? I misunderstood that. Alright. Well, I'm not agreeing for any reason in particular? We happen to have the same goals in mind - winning. Hehe. Well, Narsis, why should I not believe you are scum? CD, why aren't YOU scum?

See posts 43-44. He said: "all i'm doing is putting some pressure on and getting info." I said: "Exactly, Narsis." See posts 52-53. I said: "As for Narsis (it's all a piece of the puzzle and we are better off solving it then not.), I agree with you." To reiterate: I agree with some statements that Narsis has made. I am trying to gather information, just like he is. Narsis, post 64: "however i am in no way defending AKC, and neither him me. although we may agree partially on a particular issue, agreeing and defending are two very different things." I agree. I am supporting Narsis, if by supporting, you mean agreeing. But as I say, and as he has said, we are not defending each other - that is, against accusations. So, again, the point is that I agree with these three statements that Narsis has made. Nothing more. Nothing less.

I don't support Narsis, per se. I just agreed with a few statements he made with regard to information gathering and strategy. As for CD, I'm kinda split between two opinions: him and Kaziocore. Hmm....gotta mull this one over a bit more.

Yeah, one day, I'll get even with Theo for tricking me, last game, LOL.

Kaziocore, you will see, as the game progresses. As for Narsis (it's all a piece of the puzzle and we are better off solving it then not.), I agree with you.

Sorry, it's my fault for not communicating better. Narsis probably understands the humor, having known me in real life for a while, LOL... Uh, why FOS CD? Do I have to tell you? Again, I'm information gathering.

Well, I wanted to be sarcastic towards CD's description of a SFOS. Hehe. So, now, FOS: CD.

Exactly, Narsis.

Wind, I'm gathering information?