Everything posted by molestargazer
-
Traitors on the Battlefront
Is today's choice not obvious? Vote: Chaoshawk
-
Traitors on the Battlefront
When's deadline? MOD: If deadline's within a day, extension pretty please? Someone like to fill me in on what's happened?
-
Traitors on the Battlefront
Sorry folks, been away over the weekend up 'til now, I'm here now.
-
What are you listening to... RIGHT NOW.
Disowned Inc - Serj Tankian
-
Traitors on the Battlefront
EBWOP: The "Jesus, please" statement applies to my 99.9% post as well. Just so you know. Also - quadruple post ho!
-
Traitors on the Battlefront
Jesus, please, PLEASE do not make me reveal why I said that. Vote: Kasabian Well, this seems simple enough. If he's scum, it's good. If he's doc, we kill Chaos tomorrow.
-
Traitors on the Battlefront
EBWOP: I posted that before I saw recent updates. I'm a fool. Hang on, let me read.
-
Traitors on the Battlefront
I am 99.9% sure it's truth. Way, way more than enough to not hunt him for today at least.
-
Traitors on the Battlefront
OK, Kasabian's town. Damn.
-
Traitors on the Battlefront
If it was, would you really expect me to admit it? :facepalm: No, of course it isn't. I want a roleclaim.
-
Traitors on the Battlefront
Kasabian, I don't want to put you at L-1 and risk a quicklynch. However, you are currently at L-2. I'd like a roleclaim, please.
-
Traitors on the Battlefront
No, no. I'm NOT no-lynching.
-
Traitors on the Battlefront
Dammit people, stop posting so much. OK, I'll catch up properly, but quick post now. I am not no-lynching today. (The one exception being if it was between Me and a NL) I'd like a vote count. This is important.
-
Traitors on the Battlefront
Assuming KevinH is right, you've only been able to narrow it down to 3 scum in 7 people. If Martino can be included by certain posts being discounted or whatever, all you've managed to exclude from the entire player list is yourself and Canucks (Something that, quite frankly, you would have done anyway - Canucks is pretty pro-town). Can we pretty please hunt scum now?
-
Traitors on the Battlefront
Which means it's pretty ambigious if we have a scum in the Top 3 or not. For instance. Kasabian + Chaos + CC = 43 (None in top 3) CC + Kazio + Martino = 42 (None in top 3. Assuming a post or 2 can be discounted for not being relevant by mod standards) Chaos + Martino + Nerau = 41 (None in top 3) Chaos + Kazio + Martino = 45 (I didn't read KevinH's math, but I'm assuming this could be accounted for by having a few townie posts that aren't relevant. If it can, then that throws even more things wide open) The mod has said that the battlefield is not meant as a method of catching scum and is meant for encouraging activity. Therefore, it would be quite easy for him to discount posts to throw us off the scent. I agree that by all means, this could be used as a guideline of finding possible scum matchings and the like. But I urge people not to use this as their primary method of scumhunting. Mafia isn't a game of mathematics.
-
Count to XC before an IRON Councilor Posts
This irritates me. 2
-
What are you listening to... RIGHT NOW.
Nucleus - A DARK HALO
-
Count to XC before an IRON Councilor Posts
F***ing... 2!
-
What are you listening to... RIGHT NOW.
The Cage / Vodka - Sonata Arctica
-
Count to XC before an IRON Councilor Posts
2
-
Count to XC before an IRON Councilor Posts
2! (damn, it's a while since we got this far.)
-
Count to XC before an IRON Councilor Posts
Dammit. 1!
-
Count to XC before an IRON Councilor Posts
I've changed the title to a more realistic goal. :wink2: 1
-
Count to XC before an IRON Councilor Posts
Hm. I think we need to lower the limit. ONE!
-
Traitors on the Battlefront
1. The point is well made despite it being an acronym. Heh. 2. In essence, you're quite right. However, I could consider the possibility a scum deliberately acting differently/"scummy" to invoke WIFOM and keep his name clear is, well, very remote.