Imran Ehsan

Masked. Welcome

He mailed me. And I linked him to this thread. He doesnt have log-in problems, he can access the forum fine. I think he is just confused about the whole sign in thing. He hasnt read my mail yet but if he doesnt show up still probably we should look for another guy.

Masked. Welcome.

Masked. Welcome.

Mask adjusted. Welcome.

Masked. Welcome.

Hey hasanasohel. Welcome.

Updated

Who wants to explain what a Death Note is?

Masked. Welcome.

Try posting an invitation in the embassies. Lots of diplos from different alliances hanging around our forum nowadays.

In. :bandwagon:

Masked and welcome.

Masked and welcome.

Updated.

I have re-opened your old embassy. Welcome.

' This statement is so completely false it boggles my mind about he can make statement like this and get away with it. No. There was no way you could have known that I would be a Miller or a scum. EMs investigation showed only whether I had a gun or not. Not whether I was innocent or guilty. I could have been vigilante or a cop. It happened that I was a Miller. But it could easily have been that I was a cop or a vigilante. If I were scum, I dont know why I would claim to be a scum-like character. I would probably have claimed to be the cop. You on the other hand keep making completely false statements.

And I pointed out how it is also possible that his investigations are not rock solid facts. In this game we probably have the Godfather and the Mafia framer, as well as Miller. They all mess up investigation conducted by cops or coplike roles (gunsmith). When it is clearly specified in the beginning by the MOD that these roles have a good chance of existing, why is it that we are still ADAMANT about following an investigation result (which has a high probability of being wrong) over examining scum like behavior on Day 1. Neither you nor EM could answer why I, among almost all the players tried to save Kazio from a lynch. It may be that I am wrong about CoD, but at this point he is looking the most scummy to me. By his behavior on Day 1 and again almost identical behavior on Day 2. EM is hung up on his investigations because after all he conducted them and he is finding it difficult to see the scenario where his investigations may be wrong. On the other hand CoD is just trying to save his own skin while lynching another townie. If you want the follow an unverified investigation result, thats fine. But might I say, the town should give serious attention to these roles which exist which mess up investigation results. If the town wants to win, following cop-like roles blindly is not the solution. Look for inconsistencies and scum like behavior. You were equally as convinced of Kazio being scum when you led the bandwagon on lynching him on Day 1. We all know how that ended.

btw Rafay will understand why I am busy. We are celebrating Eid ul Azha here..which is kind of like a Christamns like celebration.

Very busy today, so i am unable to address the multitude of accusations against me but i will try to provide a detailed response tomorrow. just posting as FYI that i am not posting because i got awed by the arguments against me..

It was actually me who suspected that Aenir is scum on Day 1. Now you are saying that I suspected someone who is actually a scum...but I am also a scum? Also according EM, who yo are telling everyone else to follow: Two of them seem to be voting for you.

Your embassy war archived. I have opened it up again. Masked and welcome. You already have one :wink2: Masked and welcome.

What?! That doesnt even make sense... How have you helped exactly? You started the bandwagon on Kazio without even waiting to hear his side of the story. When I pointed that we should wait for Kazio's response, you just as quickly switched your vote. Then come Day 2, we do the same exact thing again. That looks pretty scummy to me. Yes as I have already said in my earlier post, my role is very hard to defend. But I also pointed out why people should not follow the Cop blindly in this game. There are a multitude of roles which give wrong result to investigations.

He might be a Godfather, which will make him look innocent to cops.

Well it was due to come up sooner or later. Yes. I am a Miller. <- Role Claim. I look guilty to cop type roles when investigated. Thanks for catching that Alternate_Tree and Aenir. While I understand this role is very hard to defend against, but people should be looking at what happened on Day 1 before making a decision. If I were scum I would stay silent on Day 1 and let Kazio be lynched without a fuss or join the bandwagon. It was me in fact who pointed out that people were bandwagoning on Kazio the first time which resulted in a couple of people to unvote. If I were scum, why possibly would I want a townie power role to be saved from lynching?? This game is set up so that "follow the cop blindly" strategy does NOT work. So we should be looking at voting trends and actions and make decisions. Not depend entirely on cops. Now, I am seeing a similar trend on Day 2 with Day 1. EM comes up with a theory and Chaplain of Death bandwagons immediately to get the vote rolling without even giving me a chance to defend or role claim. I believe EM;s claim to be a Gunsmith. But Chaplain of Death is scum. He is following Day 1's strategy again hoping for another quick lynch. Vote: Chaplain of Death