Perez

The game I enjoy this days is halo. I just don't know what it has that keeps me into it.

Welp, honestly not impressed. I loved COD, I have the modern warfare trilogy, blacks ops 1 and 2 but it just been stale for me. I mean ghost sucked. Then I bought advance adware thinking I would like it as Modern but didnt. I played only a week, thats it. I might buy BCIII because of the story nothing else.

Far too many to list. Tell me what you like, and we'll start from there. Honestly, I don't really know anything about her that's why I ask. The only thing I know is that she has been in politics for years.

I don't get why you guys dislike Hillary. I need reasons, why?, explanation, ext...

That guy is just the best.

I personally don't see any harm having this agreement with them. The regulations implied in the deal are very strict. This is a benefit for us and for them.

For all of you Putin lovers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-_-XpfpLPE

I wonder who it was. lol

This are my reactions after reading that: Is that really...? But why? Tha fuck, now? I just cant read that guy(Putin)...

Kim John Un 2015!!!

So far, the Russians have used nukes only for deterrence. That's precisely the point, it can deter from adequate response to Russian aggression in Georgia and Ukraine. Of course they can do this relatively easy, Georgia and Ukraine are unaligned. But Russia has been following the same script for a while now, which is to agitate Russian minorities in country X, spark unrest, then intervene militarily and go for a nice landgrab. But then there are NATO countries with significant Russian minorities like the Baltic states and Poland. The question is, when will the Russians feel brave enough to try the same shit there, and how far NATO is willing to go to protect these states in the face of Russian nuclear "deterrance". This threat might not be very real or concerning to you, but as a resident of a country that has been under Soviet occupation from 1945-1989, and where the far-right party (current ranked the second most popular) is openly financed by the Russians, it's hard for me to take a laid-back attitude. Truth is, there's been an ongoing string of murders against Russian polititians and journalists who have been critical with Putin ever since he came to power. Of course, he might not be responsible for each and ever one of those, but it's increasingly hard to give the benefit of doubt. The quality of the job also means very little, what matters is that the job was done. One can just as easily say that it was staged that way PRECISELY because we'd think secret services were more professional than that. Much easier to blame it on some mafiosos that way, wouldn't surprise me if they found the "killers" in a couple of months, wrapping up the case for good. Agression in Ukraine? You overthrew a democratically elected neutral govt and replaced it with stooge govt, you went into Russia's backyard and tried to steal their ball, they kicked you in the balls instead as a response, this isn't aggression, it's an adequate response. You complain about funding of pro-Russian politicians, pro-western politicians get funded too, openly, to the tune of billions, in all the neighboring states of Russia, probably alot more than what Russians can afford. Quid Pro Quo. Putin is smart enough to not go and poke a proper member of NATO, as is NATO that is smart enough to not use one of it's members to poke Russia, instead they use more grey or red areas rather than the blue. Job doing and quality matter a lot, the job was done in Iraq too, but you can see the results and job now needs to be done again, quality absolutely matters, the politician could have been knocked out due to heart attack or some accident, but getting shot in middle of kremlin on cameras, that's custom designed for taking a PR shot at Putin. Putin had no reason to knock out someone who doesn't even have the political stature to be a viable opposition leader nor managed to build up one for the past few years and Putin had the capability and the means to knock em out where it wouldnt hurt him politically. Putin played the cards he had, he inherited a country falling on it's own weight and turned it around into something. All these incompetent liberal petty politicians, the so-called opposition, they had their chances, they did nothing, this guy who got killed was part of the previous administration that devoured Russia from within. The only mileage they get is in western media because they repeat verbatim whatever propaganda that's flowing from west to east, that's the limit of their worth. The only reason we went to his backyard is because he (Putin) broke international laws. Do you expect the world leader to watch blindly? Are you saying you're the international law police?, because I have bridge to sell you and the sky is green. You engineer a coup, put in place an illegal govt under which an election occurs etc and cry foul when Russia responds in a similar but in a more swift and determined manner. I'm sorry but that's a very laughable comment, especially in context of international law which gets trampled over by you and allies every couple years or so. You intervened not to defend some law, you intervened to contain Russia, because you deem it in your self-interest and to cut Russia's wings, power is a relative thing, gotta keep a check on it and all that is perfectly fine and understandable, you don't get to be super power sitting doing nothing, you gotta kick any threat to your power every now and then, that's how the game is played. But cmon, if you honestly believe this has to do with international law, then my friend, you're very naive. I think Putin's biggest challenge now would be to develop a sustainable governance institution robust enough to withstand enormous outside pressure and with an ability for a clean and smooth succession and transition. South Korea managed it well as a case study, they developed and progressed under a dictator and then transitioned into a functioning democracy without a lot of drama. However, geopolitics would mean there will be strong intent and resources poured in Russia to destabilize it internally like in Ukraine and countless other countries over the past few decades. Once again, the issue is not that Russia is a democracy or not, or the govt is run like a mafia or anything, let's not insult each other's intelligence by pretending as such, the problem is Russia isnt bending the knee. I can understand where ccabal is coming from, but this has nothing to do with style of governance, you know it wont be hard enough to point out bff/own govts having worst record than Putin. In your first paragraph: 1) I rather be corrected by a police(US) than a thief(RUS). 2) The coup was made by the people, it was their choice. If the previous Ukrainian president would just accept to join the EU, non of this would of happened, people got pissed and said: "Hey this guy doesn't want to listen our opinions, lets protest". We influenced it, yes but that doesn't mean we engineer it. 3)At least the way we trample it is way less comprising than Russia. Name me one sovereign country who has been annexed in the 21 century, apart from Crimea. None... In second paragraph: Exactly, to contain a potential threat that might just keep moving forward if no one does something. In third paragraph: Yep, just killing the opposition.

So far, the Russians have used nukes only for deterrence. That's precisely the point, it can deter from adequate response to Russian aggression in Georgia and Ukraine. Of course they can do this relatively easy, Georgia and Ukraine are unaligned. But Russia has been following the same script for a while now, which is to agitate Russian minorities in country X, spark unrest, then intervene militarily and go for a nice landgrab. But then there are NATO countries with significant Russian minorities like the Baltic states and Poland. The question is, when will the Russians feel brave enough to try the same shit there, and how far NATO is willing to go to protect these states in the face of Russian nuclear "deterrance". This threat might not be very real or concerning to you, but as a resident of a country that has been under Soviet occupation from 1945-1989, and where the far-right party (current ranked the second most popular) is openly financed by the Russians, it's hard for me to take a laid-back attitude. Truth is, there's been an ongoing string of murders against Russian polititians and journalists who have been critical with Putin ever since he came to power. Of course, he might not be responsible for each and ever one of those, but it's increasingly hard to give the benefit of doubt. The quality of the job also means very little, what matters is that the job was done. One can just as easily say that it was staged that way PRECISELY because we'd think secret services were more professional than that. Much easier to blame it on some mafiosos that way, wouldn't surprise me if they found the "killers" in a couple of months, wrapping up the case for good. Agression in Ukraine? You overthrew a democratically elected neutral govt and replaced it with stooge govt, you went into Russia's backyard and tried to steal their ball, they kicked you in the balls instead as a response, this isn't aggression, it's an adequate response. You complain about funding of pro-Russian politicians, pro-western politicians get funded too, openly, to the tune of billions, in all the neighboring states of Russia, probably alot more than what Russians can afford. Quid Pro Quo. Putin is smart enough to not go and poke a proper member of NATO, as is NATO that is smart enough to not use one of it's members to poke Russia, instead they use more grey or red areas rather than the blue. Job doing and quality matter a lot, the job was done in Iraq too, but you can see the results and job now needs to be done again, quality absolutely matters, the politician could have been knocked out due to heart attack or some accident, but getting shot in middle of kremlin on cameras, that's custom designed for taking a PR shot at Putin. Putin had no reason to knock out someone who doesn't even have the political stature to be a viable opposition leader nor managed to build up one for the past few years and Putin had the capability and the means to knock em out where it wouldnt hurt him politically. Putin played the cards he had, he inherited a country falling on it's own weight and turned it around into something. All these incompetent liberal petty politicians, the so-called opposition, they had their chances, they did nothing, this guy who got killed was part of the previous administration that devoured Russia from within. The only mileage they get is in western media because they repeat verbatim whatever propaganda that's flowing from west to east, that's the limit of their worth. The only reason we went to his backyard is because he (Putin) broke international laws. Do you expect the world leader to watch blindly?

So far, the Russians have used nukes only for deterrence. That's precisely the point, it can deter from adequate response to Russian aggression in Georgia and Ukraine. Of course they can do this relatively easy, Georgia and Ukraine are unaligned. But Russia has been following the same script for a while now, which is to agitate Russian minorities in country X, spark unrest, then intervene militarily and go for a nice landgrab. But then there are NATO countries with significant Russian minorities like the Baltic states and Poland. The question is, when will the Russians feel brave enough to try the same shit there, and how far NATO is willing to go to protect these states in the face of Russian nuclear "deterrance". This threat might not be very real or concerning to you, but as a resident of a country that has been under Soviet occupation from 1945-1989, and where the far-right party (current ranked the second most popular) is openly financed by the Russians, it's hard for me to take a laid-back attitude. Truth is, there's been an ongoing string of murders against Russian polititians and journalists who have been critical with Putin ever since he came to power. Of course, he might not be responsible for each and ever one of those, but it's increasingly hard to give the benefit of doubt. The quality of the job also means very little, what matters is that the job was done. One can just as easily say that it was staged that way PRECISELY because we'd think secret services were more professional than that. Much easier to blame it on some mafiosos that way, wouldn't surprise me if they found the "killers" in a couple of months, wrapping up the case for good. Sorry guys but I would have to side with CC on this. It honestly makes more sense.

Agreed.

Yep, for them it never gets old.

Here is something cooler. Russia vs Ukraine Oh thanks Fox FF vs FF Who is the better FF??!!?? LOL

Nice, thanks!

Wont happen, but if it does... Putin is the most stupidest person I will ever know.

That is a start. In that case the most troublesome funding country towards Muslims minorities is Saudi Arabia. If they passed something like this it would really devastate future uprisings.

The only "army" who have managed to halt ISIS and take back some(little) territory is the Peshmerga. After all they have done and will do, they wont get independence. It saddens me.

What can you expect from animals...

Fuck Iraq. The Shia government in the east has already lost all credibility in the eyes of both Sunnis and Kurds. I don't think there is any repairing that. The only involvement I'm OK with is arming the Kurds. Air strikes and training can be handled by the people actually there. Like Jordan. Jordan is always boasting it's military. They're obsessed with it. Let them prove their worth. And I agree with you on that. It is the best choice. And this is for you James (they might not get independence but UK, Germany and Italy are surely arming and training them): http://edition.cnn.com/2014/10/06/world/meast/isis-coalition-nations/index.html

I have actually thought of that many times, it would be a great way to settle things. I mean the kurds has some claims in Irak and Syria, so it would mean they can take some territory of the Syrian Regime as well. Eventually both Isis and the Regime would fall with the help of US and NSA.

Take it easy, the US wont send ground troops in an active duty there. They have said it like a hundred times. The only thing the US is doing is assisting Irak with air superiority, surveillance and training.

More developments: http://edition.cnn.com/2015/02/09/europe/ukraine-conflict/index.html Its going to happen sooner or later.