akc, we can't kick you out of any games. if it turns out to be a meta, i doubt you'll get lynched in every game. however, you're disturbing my already weak scumhunting skills

I'm pretty active on the forums, which means it's quite probable that I post in this thread fast.

 

I will never make accusations regarding scumness based on prompt posting. In fact, I would prefer that we have more active players so I will be inclined to vote to lynch players that don't post.

 

It's very easy for scum to hide behind inactivity. I understand that there's a war and all but it doesn't take much effort to make an occasional post in the mafia thread.

 

If I keep on bandwagoning and stumbling around, will you guys kick me out of all future games? Or will it make me a popular lynch target?

 

Certainly only the later.

PS: i'm still looking for a replacement for the Unknown. if you know anyone give me a call.

 

3 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)

3 Members: Aquinas, KevinH, Electric Mango

 

EM, we miss you!

I don't see how ACKPluto is guilty of bandwagoning here however, he is the only one voting or did I gloss over someone?

 

I'm most suspicious of Theophilos at the moment. He has barely contributed beyond his vote for Falzis where his reasoning did not develop at all beyond what had already been stated. I'm more concerned about this bandwagon vote than the others for the time being.

Well, I've bandwagoned previously....well, thank you guys for relieving me. I thought my privilege to play was on the line.

 

So, I've a lot to lose by bandwagoning - got it!

So, I've a lot to lose by bandwagoning - got it!

 

Don't be too hard on yourself.

 

If we are ever get a lynch, there has to be a 2nd, 3rd, 4th, ... vote. If you make one of those votes, somebody will accuse you of bandwaggoning.

 

 

Yeah.

That happened to me too.

So to prevent people to accuse you of bandwagoning, give a good reason.

 

EM, we miss you!

 

EM must be the Unknown!

I'm most suspicious of Theophilos at the moment. He has barely contributed beyond his vote for Falzis where his reasoning did not develop at all beyond what had already been stated. I'm more concerned about this bandwagon vote than the others for the time being.

 

Me too. I'm a bit suspicious of Theo.

 

So to prevent people to accuse you of bandwagoning, give a good reason.

 

...even if the reason is the same as that previously given.

 

For instance, Windblade has given us some good reasons to suspect him. He voted to lynch atownie and the townie that was voting for him got killed. A vote on him would easily be defended as not bandwaggoning.

 

eh... this is going nowhere fast. gonna vote: Windblade for now. you all know why.

Alright, thank you for the helps, guys. I, for one, don't think that junk is bandwagoning at this point. Hehe.

I, for one, don't think that junk is bandwagoning at this point.

 

So now you're defending a bandwaggoner. A sure scum-tell! (just kidding)

 

Night 2 begins. Majority is 5; Half-majority is 3. Deadline is March 13th.

 

 

eh... this is going nowhere fast.

 

I would prefer more activity prior to the deadline on March 13.

 

My vote will go onto Windblade because I believe he is the most suspicious but I would rather not see a quick lynch with 5 votes going his way without any other discussion.

Alright, where can I sign up to be a scum?

 

Why would I convince my scum fellows to vote on CD when I've made it so clear I suspected him. It is clear that I would be an immediate suspect because of what I said.

 

And for why I thought CD was scum, his post.

Vote: Windblade

 

At this point we really don't know who is who.

Falzis seems like a good choice...however...if he is townie, then one of the four that voted for him is scum.

 

My gut is going to Windblade...so that's where my vote will go.

 

I don't like gut, come with suspicions and facts.

 

Here some facts.

 

After Aquinas voted CD.

CD's post:

 

I find it interesting that you are homing in on me for my vote and not anyone else for their vote.

I'm thinking BH is correct in assuming you are mafia.

The only reason I think voted for me is cuz of my veteran experience...and it would best served for you to eliminate me as early as possible.

It seems you are trying to sway the focus off of Windblade onto others such as myself.

FOS: Aquinas

 

So, why is everyone focusing on me and forget about that in fact he voted on CD. He is now dead. Of course, this could also scum trying to get an another townie.

 

I FoS: Theopholis.

 

Reason is that he hasn't posted yet and is active on the forums otherwise. He's keeping a low profile, so for what reason?

 

 

Also Modquestion: Must all scum people vote before the target gets killed?

 

So, why is everyone focusing on me and forget about that in fact he voted on CD. He is now dead. Of course, this could also scum trying to get an another townie.

 

Are you inditing me of something here? What are you trying to say? Are you just trying to get suspicion off relative to my actions?

I say that we respect the dead and at least consider their options. CD FoS you, but I only see that KevinH mentioned that, and you haven't responded to that. So I'm bringing it up again to let it know, you have to say that it is a bit suspicious.

 

Further I currently hold no other suspicions against you, that's why I don't FoS you.

@Aquinas - You voted for CanucksDyanasty and then he was night-killed. Were you responsible? (Just kidding on that one.)

 

I believe this is what you are referring to. I considered not responding to it because it seemed to me it was not a serious accusation because of that last parenthetical aside.

 

Can I clear my name here? Should I have to? Well, you suggested that we respect the dead and as such I will try not to speculate to much on what CanucksDynasty's thoughts were on the matter. However, it seems to me that his FOS was based on the fact that he, unlike me, knew himself to be town allied. After my vote he FOSd me because he believed that I accused him out of malice. I accused him because I believed his accusation of Windblade to be baseless. I did not believe that Falzis was scum nor did I believe at the time that you were scum. I voted for CD to spread out the vote and not condemn either of two players who I considered to be townies. Especially when doing so meant that by hammering either of you two I would end up lynched next (most likely) and then the town would be down two members. I believe Falzis and Windblade were tied at that end of the day, although I may have that wrong the sentiment remains the same. I voted for CanucksDynsaty because I did not like his reasoning and his "gut feeling" vote to be not in keeping with his general meticulous play style.

LOL @ Kevin.

 

I personally don't suspect Aquinas...that is a satisfactory defense.

 

Seriously, let's take out Wind and see what happens. What do we have to lose?

 

LOL @ Kevin.

 

I personally don't suspect Aquinas...that is a satisfactory defense.

 

Seriously, let's take out Wind and see what happens. What do we have to lose?

 

Another townie player.

I should say, that last post wasn't so much in defense of Windblade but, to demonstrate how unlucky we've been thus far.

it seemed to me it was not a serious accusation because of that last parenthetical aside.

Indeed, I did not expect a response. If you were scum, you certainly wouldn't say, "you're right -- I wanted him dead and since I didn't get the lynch, I night-killed him"

 

I voted for CD to spread out the vote

 

That's something I would do. Voting no-lynch gets people angry but voting for someone that isn't going to be lynched seems ok.

 

That's something I would do. Voting no-lynch gets people angry but voting for someone that isn't going to be lynched seems ok.

 

With all do respect to your no-lynch strategies, I don't think it is something you would do, at least no in spirit. I voted for CanucksDynasty because I thought he was a better lynch candidate than either Falzis or Windblade at that time. I wanted to lynch someone, I believe the town is better off today because Falzis died than we would have been if we had only lost CanucksDynasty. Obviously, not as well off if Falzis had been scum. I did not vote for CanucksDynasty so that we would not lynch a someone in fact, I may have made a different decision if the half majority had not been reached. I voted for him because I believed he was more likely scum than either Falzis or Windblade, obviously I was wrong.

LOL @ Kevin.

 

I personally don't suspect Aquinas...that is a satisfactory defense.

 

Seriously, let's take out Wind and see what happens. What do we have to lose?

 

You would take out another townie player. And thanks for your explanation Aquinas.

With all do respect to your no-lynch strategies, I don't think it is something you would do, at least no in spirit.

But that's exactly what I did do when I voted for mole. Remember this?

 

A great way to do the no-lynch vote, without doing it. I commend you, sir.

Or this?

 

If I didn't vote for mole, I would vote for BastilleHades, Theophilos, or Nerau, giving one of them their first vote. Would that be better?

And I almost fogot ...

 

Falzis, the Apprentice, an Insane Guy, and a simple townie, was hung Night 1.

 

"I told you so"