Aquinas

Vote: Theophilos He is probably a repeat offender.

In! Phew just made it!

Yeah. However, it doesn't sound like we will postpone and maintain too much activity.

Vote: Theophilos

I'm going to disagree with your reasoning here. I don't think the two votes Windblade had would be enough to scare a scum into retaliating like that. It was a "gut feeling" vote. There wasn't any case built and if CanucksDynasty was not night killed we probably wouldn't even have paid much attention if CanucksDynasty hadn't pushed the matter. My bet is that CanucksDynasty was killed because he is a veteran. He is a good player and the scum didn't want to deal with him. Power role or not he is always and asset for the town. That said, I am going to toss my vote on Theophilos. He hasn't been around to contribute much. Generally that would not be good enough for me except that he had a vote of Falzis. He had barely anything to say about it. Certainly however I don't admit high strength to the case. It just seems to me that he has been lurking around and found a convient out getting a vote on Falzis for the half majority. Without putting an official hammer down his vote made a big difference that he hadn't been posting about much to analyze. Vote: Theophilos He is in the thread now so, considering a good case from Theophilos my vote could swing over to Windblade or anyone else shortly.

With all do respect to your no-lynch strategies, I don't think it is something you would do, at least no in spirit. I voted for CanucksDynasty because I thought he was a better lynch candidate than either Falzis or Windblade at that time. I wanted to lynch someone, I believe the town is better off today because Falzis died than we would have been if we had only lost CanucksDynasty. Obviously, not as well off if Falzis had been scum. I did not vote for CanucksDynasty so that we would not lynch a someone in fact, I may have made a different decision if the half majority had not been reached. I voted for him because I believed he was more likely scum than either Falzis or Windblade, obviously I was wrong.

I should say, that last post wasn't so much in defense of Windblade but, to demonstrate how unlucky we've been thus far.

Another townie player.

I believe this is what you are referring to. I considered not responding to it because it seemed to me it was not a serious accusation because of that last parenthetical aside. Can I clear my name here? Should I have to? Well, you suggested that we respect the dead and as such I will try not to speculate to much on what CanucksDynasty's thoughts were on the matter. However, it seems to me that his FOS was based on the fact that he, unlike me, knew himself to be town allied. After my vote he FOSd me because he believed that I accused him out of malice. I accused him because I believed his accusation of Windblade to be baseless. I did not believe that Falzis was scum nor did I believe at the time that you were scum. I voted for CD to spread out the vote and not condemn either of two players who I considered to be townies. Especially when doing so meant that by hammering either of you two I would end up lynched next (most likely) and then the town would be down two members. I believe Falzis and Windblade were tied at that end of the day, although I may have that wrong the sentiment remains the same. I voted for CanucksDynsaty because I did not like his reasoning and his "gut feeling" vote to be not in keeping with his general meticulous play style.

Are you inditing me of something here? What are you trying to say? Are you just trying to get suspicion off relative to my actions?

I don't see how ACKPluto is guilty of bandwagoning here however, he is the only one voting or did I gloss over someone? I'm most suspicious of Theophilos at the moment. He has barely contributed beyond his vote for Falzis where his reasoning did not develop at all beyond what had already been stated. I'm more concerned about this bandwagon vote than the others for the time being.

Certainly only the later.

Forgot to mention, that last post was mostly me thinking out loud and trying to be open and honest. There may or may not be anything of value to you.

I thought about coming in and tossing another on Windblade. I'm have to believe Falzis is a townie and so I am very upset about his impending lynch but, I fear it would to the town no good. If Windblade is a townie, I'd get lynched for sure. Then we'd be out two town members. If Falzis is scum, I'd get lynched for sure. We'd be at 1 and 1. I'd go for Windblade on the chance that he is scum and save my own skin (potentially) on Day 2. However, odds are he is townie since I have only seen everything short of evidence against him. That means we're down two townies after my death. If Falzis turns out be be scum, I'll prolly end up dead (though I believe on no account of my own actions). If I am to vote for him now and he turns out to be townie I'm certainly dead. Therefore,it seems either in either case, we're out the greater number of townies. Therefore, I'll keep my vote where it is and hope that the rest of you sort Falzis v. Windblade out accuratly. @Accusers of Windblade(Specifically CanucksDynasty): Can you elaborate of the case against him?

Vote: CannucksDynasty For putting the third vote on Windblade without any sufficient reasoning. There really is no case for him. Thats not a defense of him either so don't get any ideas BastilleHades. I'd simply like to point out that CanucksDynasty's gut feeling lent enough credence to the matter to sway Junkahoolik's vote and now we have a clear neck and neck race. Neither of these canidates to I find particularity scummy. I'm am compelled to believe in Falzis because he "defended" a townie, if you can even call it that. Windblade is getting taken down for I don't know what reason. Falzis at least made an accusation in his vote. I think Nerau's vote was random and Junkahoolik is now just piling on. Generally I would condemn Junkahoolik's bandwagoning and vote for him, but at least he pointed out his rationale.

Yikes. I feel like I am the target of some kind of vendetta. I fear for the ramifications of your witch hunt, whatever the outcome if Falzis is to be lynched. If Falzis is scum and I am lynched your victory will be squandered by your realization of my innocence and loss of my benefit on behalf of the town. And where will you go from there? Continue to dig for murky accusations? If Falzis is a member of our town we will loose a good man, I will indeed hold you to some scrutiny although I will profess I hope it becomes that your are misguided rather than violent. It seems that I, and all of us, will know when the morning comes... What of you who hold a sole vote, where will your allegiance stand? To reason or to a rash crusade?

I will not vote for Falzis, for this reason, this day. I am sure that I am townie. I will always play professing no more than the knowledge that that is indeed true. Knowing this, I find no reason for Falzis to defend me if he is indeed playing a scum role. A scum should not have come to my aid, as during this time there was little need and little merit to do so. I am thankful that Falzis did, surely it has misdirected some heat I have garnered to himself. I fear that if Falzis does indeed turn out to be scum from a lynch, you all will be suspicious of me next. I would ask his accusers this, what motivation would scum have in defending another scum that early in the game? With such a small case made it seems like it would do little more than draw unnecessary attention. Furthermore, as the scum are the only players to understand a majority of alignments early on it would be seemingly more beneficial to place suspicion on a independent party or redirect conversation than to rush to the defense of the other so hardly tarnished. If indeed somehow I am wrong which seems to me unlikely, I surely will not farewell in the days to come. However, I will again assert my position and defense that I will not vote for Falzis, a scum would have no reason to defend me, a townie the only thing I can be sure of.

I agree, I assure you I will aid the town to the best of my ability. Voting for Unorthodox and Strange seems much more beneficial... However, I can think of a cool power role to fit all the titles which makes random voting infinitely more difficult. I would vote for Nerau since he is the only one without a title, but that could just be TMWIFOM (The Mod's Wine In Front of Me). Alas, I will stay my vote until there is more information out there. We'll see where this goes for now. The night is still young!

Bummer, its over. As a result of my absence I decided not to intervene in the current day. I knew that if I voted the wrong way it would pull a ton of heat. As a townie my goal is generally self preservation because the only role I am sure is townie is mine. So, I figured since I had missed so much it was of little use to anyone for me to get involved. Well, see you all in the next game.

I just got here....((am I dead?)) I sincerely apologize. I really dropped the ball here. Give me a short while longer to familiarize myself and I'll get in the game.

I'm back and I'm in.

@ Narsis: You got me as far as knowing goes. I was pretty sure ElectricMango would vote for CanucksDynasty. I don't think that assumption was far off. He wasn't very active and his last accusations were pointed at CanucksDynasty. At which point I figured CanucksDynasty would turn around and vote for ACKPluto to make sure a half majority would not lynch him. @ CanucksDynasty: You're sure in both of your scenarios that ElectricMango is scum. In a LOYL why are you voting for someone who is 50/50 scum in your scenarios instead of someone you are more sure of. There doesn't seem like much of a reason to vote for ACKPluto to save your skin here. If you mislynch you loose.

I think its clear this vote was also placed to save your own skin being tied with ACKPluto before you voted. This vote insured you'd survive if the vote stay the way they are. One of the reasons why I didn't vote for ACKPluto was because of this. I figured you'd vote for him after ElectricMango voted for you. However I wonder, you wrote a good post defending SinKon/ACKPluto a long while ago (so much so I don't want to dig it up although I think you may remember). Why now do you vote for him? It looks to me like you're just trying to save yourself rather than vote for a scum target to me. Could you confirm this our further justify your vote for ACKPluto instead of Falzis, ElectricMango or Martino? Maybe not so much ElectricMango or Martino at this point but, certainly Falzis indeed is in the same scum-tell boat by voting patterns and night actions as ACKPluto is in.

That's almost right. Actually, I think you're using AKCPluto as a scapegoat. Through that roles replacements we've have rookie players and the first one really got on people nerves. Its easy to draw conclusions about a player like that. We're looking at some pretty sneaky scum in this game and I don't think they're playing as overtly outspoken as SinKon was.

I really don't. Its more that I'm just not convinced from the evidence I have seen. At first it was because SinKon was annoying which just turned into a case against him because he became inactive. I just don't see it. I'm not trying to stand up for him I just am not convinced by him.