Guys, seriously, at this point, I have very little ... he voted for X, so I think I'll vote for Y ... so I'm picking randomly.

*enters the Greek hero >_<

 

Hiya all, missed the fact that this started, thus I'm a tad late ...

 

 

Having read the ongoings up to the above post, I'd echo the thought that Falzis is indeed acting a tad strange with that FOS and defence of Aquinas out of the blue.

I'd say it's normal to vote randomly on day 1, mostly I'd think, so it makes no sense to FOS someone so fast for having only cast a random vote; thus "fishy" is as good as any word to describe Falzis' reaction.

 

Based on that, vote: Falzis

Mod: Is Mole playing, aka can we vote for him and will there be a death scene?

 

 

@MOD - Can we get a votecount?

 

Alot of people voted when they didn't unvote and also didn't bold their votes.

 

 

Mod: Please answer the above.

 

Also, Mod: Do the scum know they are scum? Aka, is it possible someone is scum and does not know?

 

man you guys ask a lot from a mod.

 

(btw i was gone all day yesterday. with the Olympics in town and an offer from a friend to go down for the day...i didn't get back until 1 AM my time. )

 

first: mole is not playing, although you can vote for him. the rule is somewhat of a joke.

 

second: i'll get right on that VC. although i do count non-bolded votes and will switch a vote for a person...if they dont bold it and dont unvote i run the risk of making a mistake...and if i do and it results in a mislynch then that's their own fault and won't be fixed.

 

third: scum most indeed know they are scum.

 

fourth, and an added goodie: man i love seeing you all squirm. however Mod WIFOM will get you no where.

Then I am 100% townie, and still think we should lynch Falzis.

The "I Laugh at Your Calamity" VC

 

Falzis - 4 (BH, AKC, Wind, Theo)

Kaziocore - 1 (CD)

AKCPluto - 1 (Kazio)

Windblade - 1 (Nerau)

 

Molestargazer - 1 (Kevin)

I will not vote for Falzis, for this reason, this day. I am sure that I am townie. I will always play professing no more than the knowledge that that is indeed true. Knowing this, I find no reason for Falzis to defend me if he is indeed playing a scum role. A scum should not have come to my aid, as during this time there was little need and little merit to do so. I am thankful that Falzis did, surely it has misdirected some heat I have garnered to himself. I fear that if Falzis does indeed turn out to be scum from a lynch, you all will be suspicious of me next. I would ask his accusers this, what motivation would scum have in defending another scum that early in the game? With such a small case made it seems like it would do little more than draw unnecessary attention. Furthermore, as the scum are the only players to understand a majority of alignments early on it would be seemingly more beneficial to place suspicion on a independent party or redirect conversation than to rush to the defense of the other so hardly tarnished. If indeed somehow I am wrong which seems to me unlikely, I surely will not farewell in the days to come. However, I will again assert my position and defense that I will not vote for Falzis, a scum would have no reason to defend me, a townie the only thing I can be sure of.

Nice try. WHEN we find Falzis to be scum, we'll be looking at you next. His fingers slipped and he made a mistake, and he's paying for it now.

 

I also think KevinH might be murky, as he didn't do his no-lynch thing. Last thread he was scum, and he did a similar thing to what he did here. Just a FYI.

Nice try. WHEN we find Falzis to be scum, we'll be looking at you next. His fingers slipped and he made a mistake, and he's paying for it now.

 

I also think KevinH might be murky, as he didn't do his no-lynch thing. Last thread he was scum, and he did a similar thing to what he did here. Just a FYI.

 

Yikes. I feel like I am the target of some kind of vendetta. I fear for the ramifications of your witch hunt, whatever the outcome if Falzis is to be lynched. If Falzis is scum and I am lynched your victory will be squandered by your realization of my innocence and loss of my benefit on behalf of the town. And where will you go from there? Continue to dig for murky accusations? If Falzis is a member of our town we will loose a good man, I will indeed hold you to some scrutiny although I will profess I hope it becomes that your are misguided rather than violent. It seems that I, and all of us, will know when the morning comes...

 

What of you who hold a sole vote, where will your allegiance stand? To reason or to a rash crusade?

Yikes. I feel like I am the target of some kind of vendetta. I fear for the ramifications of your witch hunt, whatever the outcome if Falzis is to be lynched. If Falzis is scum and I am lynched your victory will be squandered by your realization of my innocence and loss of my benefit on behalf of the town. And where will you go from there? Continue to dig for murky accusations? If Falzis is a member of our town we will loose a good man, I will indeed hold you to some scrutiny although I will profess I hope it becomes that your are misguided rather than violent. It seems that I, and all of us, will know when the morning comes...

 

What of you who hold a sole vote, where will your allegiance stand? To reason or to a rash crusade?

 

Eh, if Falzis is innocent then you'll be off the hook and I'll likely be next on the lynch list. Which is fine, I'm willing to risk my life because Falzis is just acting so weird he has to be scum. It's not a vendetta, it's just Day 1 and I have no other basis to go on

How funny I've already got four votes on me. That must mean I can't be scum... (figure out why lol)

 

FOS on all who have voted for me.

 

(OOC: my heart got broken...)

You want to expand on that, or give us some reason to believe you? And, going a step further, you want to point at someone else?

Believe what you want to believe. I don't care. I'm pointing to those who have voted for me. Imagine that, four votes already!! I imagine there are three scum in this 11 person game, with at least one scum vote on me already.

...which means you believe BH, AKC, Wind, or Theo are scum (possibly 1 or more). Problem is I don't know Wind or Theo, AKC seemed to more or less take direction from me (and I think I was pretty compelling). Definitely something to take note of, if you are proven innocent.

Whereas 2 more votes mean lynch i will leave my vote where it lay in the meantime

 

i believe disscussion needs to continue, though i do have my beliefs on falzis

I say lets get the hammer done on Falzis, and then see if he's scum or not. If not, it's curtains for me, if he IS then we're one step closer.

 

There isn't really anything else to say until we know for sure.

Ugh why am I the RVS sacrificial lamb? WTF what the hell i'm going to sleep

Ugh why am I the RVS sacrificial lamb? WTF what the hell i'm going to sleep

 

I just really hate getting fingered.

Three scum out of eleven seems about right.

 

No townie can know a scum at first sight.

 

Nobody knows nothin' and still you fight.

 

I hope we get lucky this night!

 

 

i really don't see the case against Falzis... and Hades, why did you switch our case from Aquinas to Falzis??

ebwop:

 

why did you switch your case from Aquinas to Falzis??

Since I doubt scum would charge straight ahead and put his neck out early on, I am more suspicious of AKC, Wind and Theo than Hades.

 

I love how paranoid everyone is.

 

Falzis voted for Bastille Hades immediately when Bastille Hades voted kind of random. Which is something everyone does at the first day night. Does Falzis feel threatened that his partner in crime is getting a vote?

 

But then the fact that AKCPLUTO post to lynch Falzis without any good reason provided. Could it be that Bastille Hades henchmen AKCPLUTO voted for Falzis? His vote is without much reasoning. Saying that something smells fishy on the first day night goes a bit to far. Who is right?

 

For now I vote Falzis based on that it is indeed a bit suspicious.

 

This is just wrong. Aquinas was never in danger of being lynched, he got an RVS vote. I'm really at a lost why you and Theo would think that I felt the need to defend Aquinas, and that assuming I'm scum why defend him so outright. Nevermind that my post was also an RVS post along the lines of the flavor text plus it was an FOS and not a vote. =.=

 

Since I think this post implies an assumption of guilt on my part and AKC, and I think that scum already want to taint more people as scummy, and that based on this post AKC should have been more suspicious than I was (bandwagon no reasoning vote)...

 

Vote: Windblade

Da Rules

6. Days will last 1 week, or less. Nights will last a minimum of 24 hours and up to 48 hours.

 

Since days are night and nights are day, shouldn't this night be over after 48 hours?

 

 

Since days are night and nights are day, shouldn't this night be over after 48 hours?

 

 

nope. that rule is intentionally written backwards.

I was voting randomly until Falzis acted up, and nothing he has said since has swayed me otherwise. As I said before, if Falzis is scum we can go after Aq, if not I think that puts Aq's head out the night 2 lynch noose....

It is officially...

 

Night 1

 

...And so it begins.

 

Majority is 6(unless i get a 12th player in which case it would become 7). Deadline is update Feb 30. Half-majority is 3(or 4).

 

So who done it?

 

Feb 30th doesn't exist.

So is the deadline Sunday Feb 28th instead?