761 replies to this topic

[AKCPLUTO]

Based on what I have read thus far, my vote is on CD. Vote: Canucks Dynasty.

VOTE COUNT
CaoCao (3): Electric Mango, CanucksDynasty, KevinH
CanucksDynasty (2): ccabal86, AKCPLUTO

Not Voting (5): TerrorChrist, Nerau, CaoCao, Preston, reign of terror

With 10 Alive, 6 is needed to lynch.
3 is needed to lynch at deadline.

Edited by molestargazer, 05 May 2011 - 08:15 PM.

[KevinH]

I have no idea where my previous double post came from ...

My point was that Narsis made this absolute claim that he had no justification for making. If we would have all agreed, we would have lynched d3mon the townie and then lynched him. That's not very good play for a scum nor is it very good play for a townie.

I think CaoCao is our best option to lynch at this point.

[Preston]

Based on what I have read thus far, my vote is on CD. Vote: Canucks Dynasty.

Since we haven't heard much from you yet AKCPLUTO, please specify which posts/analysis/etc you've read that are making you choose to vote CD. CD and Cao Cao are my top two right now, and I'm interested in anything that may give me a means to differentiate between them. Even at this late stage, new information/viewpoints/analysis could still cause the vote to go anywhere.

-Preston

[AKCPLUTO]

I would prefer not to discuss my rationale insofar as my analysis has been very limited in nature. However, I have a lot of confidence in your competence and judgment.

[AKCPLUTO]

I would prefer not to discuss my rationale insofar as my analysis has been very limited in nature. However, I have a lot of confidence in your competence and judgment.

[AKCPLUTO]

Hmm, it improperly double posted me...my bad...or more accurately, my internet's bad.

[KevinH]

Death to the scum!

[reign of terror]

Kevin and AKC both double posted!! They must be scum!!!

[TerrorChrist]

Well, I am getting rather annoyed now... the new replacements all act as suspicious as they possibly could.

But I am getting off the fence.

Vote: CaoCao

[reign of terror]

CaoCao (4): Electric Mango, CanucksDynasty, KevinH, TerrorChrist
CanucksDynasty (2): ccabal86, AKCPLUTO

Not Voting (4): reign of terror, Nerau, CaoCao, Preston

@TC I could be much more suspicious if I wanted to.
I will vote CaoCao unless convinced any other option is better.

[KevinH]

Kevin and AKC both double posted!! They must be scum!!!

The scum are attacking us!

[Preston]

I would prefer not to discuss my rationale insofar as my analysis has been very limited in nature. However, I have a lot of confidence in your competence and judgment.

The problem I have is that if you throw down a vote with no rationale given, then you're getting away with not really giving much detail at all. Given that you JUST replaced Narsis, I do not believe your rationale could be from any sort of role information - you havent had a night yet to use it, and if narsis was inactive he could not have either. Absent that only valid excuse, I cannot see a reason to NOT explain your reasoning. We need to know what/how you are thinking, who you are siting with/against, etc - information that can be used to link potential scum together regardless of whether the lynch succeeds or fails.

Death to the scum!

Kevin and AKC both double posted!! They must be scum!!!

Doubleposts happen. Let's try to stay focused please - we dont have much time left.

If RoT and I applied our votes right now the lynch would happen, but we NEED to hear more from akcpluto at minimum before the day ends; if needed we can ask mole for an extension (and have it actually HAPPEN this time). I don't like that AKC's posts so far have been that sparse: one to question when he was mentioned in relation to Narsis's list, one to place a vote with no reason given, and one to say that he doesn't want to give a reason. It's not enough for suspicion yet, but if he refuses to give his reason AGAIN then I'll be very curious as to why.

-Preston

[KevinH]

I can't imagine why a townie would not want to discuss the rationale behind a vote.

I can't imagine why a scum would not want to make up a false rationale behind a vote.

[CanucksDynasty]

I can't imagine why a townie would not want to discuss the rationale behind a vote.

I can't imagine why a scum would not want to make up a false rationale behind a vote.

Because they'd rather not say too much that might be used against them.

[AKCPLUTO]

Preston,

In the last 6 months, there was a game where I attempted to go for a "preemptive strike" in that I began accusing and voting against people on the first day. I ended up getting lynched real fast for talking too much. As such, I am trying to adjust and more under control with regard to what I say, when I say it, and how I say it. It has to do with being more conservative with how I play the game. CD is exactly right in understanding that I am reluctant to speak insofar as I am afraid of running into suspicion.

As an aside, It would be nice if I had access to a spreadsheet or document that tracked the history of each player to this point; that is, a log of FoS' and votes.

My rationale for voting against CD is because of his involvement in voting against demon on day 1. I also noted how Caocao had the hammer vote, which may be part of the case against him here on day 2. I want to admit that I am somewhat hasty in my conclusion, but I am confident enough in it to move forward.

[TerrorChrist]

Preston,(...)

As an aside, It would be nice if I had access to a spreadsheet or document that tracked the history of each player to this point; that is, a log of FoS' and votes.

Nobody is stopping you from making such a spreadsheet.

[AKCPLUTO]

I understand that, Terror. However, I am admittedly being lazy in that I am curious to know if any such spreadsheet already exists, LOL.

[TerrorChrist]

And I am admittedly lazy hoping that you are going to put in all the effort

But then again...could anyone trust any list they didn't make themselves?

[KevinH]

Sometimes we do that with post counts to compare activity.

It's appropriate to remain vague and not draw attention. I think attention is increased if someone refuses to comment.

[Electric Mango]

I put together a couple posts day2 that tracked the FOSs that may be helpful.