Allright, just to avoid jumping on the No-Lynch bandwagon ...

So I think everyone has posted and KevinH was the last ...

 

They must be scum!

Vote: SirCrocodile

 

Last game was very different from this game.

Last game we already know the roles included in the game.

In this game, we are not sure whether there is a cop or not.

If you would have observed, last game there's almost no discussion

whatsoever as all the players have done is no lynch and then disappear...

And also if ever there is a cop, unlike the previous game, it is very unlikely that

the target of the cop will be broadcasted for all the players

(last game was the first where that happened)

unvote

vote:kaziocore

 

Solid arguments, but why did you vote for me?

Edited January 20, 201214 yr by SirCrocodile

I'm gonna go on the bet that there is a cop and he gets lucky before a lynch or lose situation.

 

Vote: No-Lynch

unvote

vote:kaziocore

 

Solid arguments, but why did you vote for me?

 

it's better than no lynching...

i find it suspicious that people

chose no-lynch very fast

 

and yours? retaliation?

Unvote

 

There are too many votes for no lynch atm and I dont think any quick decision helps the town.

 

I am finding Sir Crocodile very suspicious>

 

Vote: SirCrocodile

 

Can I ask why?

Wow, this is better discussion on day one than in any other game. Sorry to be late *cowers from the wrath of Electric Mango*

 

There has got to be a cop, but with accusations already flying, I'd rather not no lynch so fast and see if we can instead find a good pick for scum.

 

Looks to me like Imran's vote was relatively arbitrary, but Kaziocore placed a second pretty quickly. I wonder why they both picked the same target right out of the gate...

neither of them gave real specific reasons for SirCrocodile that distinguished him from the other no-lynch voters.

Also Crocodile was the 3rd to no lynch. If you're going to put a blame someone to no lynch right out of the gate wouldn't it be d3mon?

 

Edit: Just noticed he unvoted after I posted

Edited January 20, 201214 yr by ABigDeer

@ABigDeer

 

Um.. I think you are forgetting a rule

 

2. No editing or deleting posts.

My suspicions are not based on air. I find it very suspicious that SirCrocodile confirmed so early. Almost 12 hrs before I even received my game pm. So it is likely that those who are scum were given role pms early..and those who are inncocent (me) received role pms later on in the day.

 

aaand..it is more fun to lynch then to do no lynch. :V

Ok i just noticed he posted 2 hrs earlier than others...not 12 hrs. my bad. but still "off with his head!"

Sorry thought it was meaning something like someone else editing/deleting someone else's post.

Ouch, that editing was bad. I did it once and nearly cost me a lynch. I think it's enough to at least put a suspicion on you.

 

FoS: ABigDeer

Besides, how could we edit someone else's post without mod powers?

They must be scum!

 

Exactly what I would suspect a scum would say when cornered like a rat!

 

With that said, I realized that Beebs was truly the last one to post, so in all fairness...

 

Unvote: KevinH

Vote: Beebs

 

Feel my wrath Beebs!

 

*OOC* We have a good friend whose nick name is Beebs, I felt the need to add that as it's the only other Beebs I've known until now. Too bad you're obviously scum Beebs, we could have been friends. Now you'll just have to die with the rest of your scum buddies.

Unvote: KevinH

Vote: Beebs

 

I'm a noob

My suspicions are not based on air. I find it very suspicious that SirCrocodile confirmed so early. Almost 12 hrs before I even received my game pm. So it is likely that those who are scum were given role pms early..and those who are inncocent (me) received role pms later on in the day.

 

aaand..it is more fun to lynch then to do no lynch. :V

What is that based on? I could have forgone checking the role PM for perhaps 3 hours and my role would not have changed any. How do you know I got my PM early? Maybe you just got one late. Maybe you chose not to respond as quickly as I did. That argument is invalid.

 

You want to random lynch. That seems to be a bit suspicious mindset you have because if you're Mafia, you know who your allies are (Assuming they are a single faction) so you don't care who dies, just that a town dies.

Double posted. Oops.

Edited January 20, 201214 yr by SirCrocodile

Again an edit.

 

FoS: SirCrocodile

I edited out a double post. Is that suspicious?

Sir Crocodile, editing of posts regardless of the reason is disallowed.

Wow, this is better discussion on day one than in any other game. Sorry to be late *cowers from the wrath of Electric Mango*

 

There has got to be a cop, but with accusations already flying, I'd rather not no lynch so fast and see if we can instead find a good pick for scum.

 

Looks to me like Imran's vote was relatively arbitrary, but Kaziocore placed a second pretty quickly. I wonder why they both picked the same target right out of the gate...

neither of them gave real specific reasons for SirCrocodile that distinguished him from the other no-lynch voters.

 

Same with the relatively fast voting on no lynch...

The scum would want relatively few discussions...

so the only way to go against it is to vote

Regardless if I chose KevinH instead, someone will still point that out.

I edited out a double post. Is that suspicious?

 

Editing posts would allow scum to go back and change or delete parts of their conversation. A townies main weapon is his/her ability to research posts and look for clues and voting patterns that help them catch mafia.

 

I believe you edited your posts innocently, but since there is no way to verify your original post there is no way to tell.

 

Golden Rule, do not edit posts for any reason

Lynch v. No Lynch

 

I believe that it is in the town's best interest to lynch on Day 1. There can be information gathered during conversation we have during this day and more importantly, we will have the beginning of voting records and patterns as well. With a quick no lynch vote, we would begin Day 2 with as little knowledge as we have today. Rock the vote.

Following that train of thought, I have to ask; we have little knowledge, only when people confirmed and who voted for who based on that. There is no real reason to vote for anybody, so a no lynch would be in place. The problem with that is that as Electric Mango said, a no lynch would leave us where we are today minus a few people who were night killed and possibly a cop investigation. A truly random lynch is best at the moment, with no real reason to accuse or defend and we all have to take a stand behind a single chosen victim or we will not get enough votes behind a single person to lynch.

Who should be lynched?

unvote