Hmm why cam are you bent on lynching sum1. Especially me. So you're just gonna kill sum1 easy, who is already being lynched by so many. Sounds like scum/opportunistic talk to me.

The way the game normally works, at some point the town has to start guessing at whom the scum are in order to win.

 

Since a scum, but not a townie, died by a night-kill last night, maybe this game is not normal.

 

However, we should at least get some voting going so we have something to analyze later.

 

Unvote: OrangeRush7

Vote: Reign of Terror

 

... because Ccabal86 is kind of liking that version better.

Well, like it or not, we need to get lynching...

 

Vote: Reign of Terror

 

it's really sad that by Day 3, we still have nothing to go off of.

I'm still pondering that no townies were killed last night.

Did a doc save us? Can he do it again?

Did a cop investigate? Is there information that's not being shared?

I think with so many ppl there have to be multiple roles involved or maybe two ppl maybe given the same role for two factions. Also are we the only 4-5 alive.

Reign_of_Terror I'm in agreement with the sentiment we need a lynching, and I'm going on vacation away from steady internet for the next few days.

 

One thing that is probable is that whoever is the cop role has some crazy twist as par for the rest of the game, so we can't assume someone just withholding cop info

You bolded Reign_of_Terror but I'm not sure that will count as a vote.

 

Player Actions/Voting/Player Death

...

• Votes should be bolded or they may not be counted (e.g. Vote: Player).
  
• Vote revocations should be bolded or they may not be counted (e.g. Unvote: Player or Unvote).
  
• You may Vote: No Lynch - a simple majority of these vote types is usually required to send the game to Night phase without a Lynch.
  
• Votes/Unvotes should be placed on a line all by themselves to make them easier for everyone to see.
  
• Votes/Unvotes that reasonably follow the guidelines specified above, and are unambiguous with respect to player nicknames/abbreviations, will count.
  ...
  

 

Please post again with your intent.

Posts since June 9th:

14 KevinH

8 Rafay

5 BeeBs

5 ccabal86

4 Electric Mango

3 Alternate_Tree

3 Cam177

2 Daimos

1 Xx Karl xX

0 Angel Cruz dela Sant

0 OrangeRush7

0 Reign of Terror

0 ABigDeer

Sorry about that, forget the rules sometimes

 

Vote: Reign_of_Terror

I'm behind pushing for a vote as well, but tossing a forth on Reign of Terror would be a little quick I think?

 

Before that happens can we decide as a team, that if a cop/doc does have information regrading last night or any other that they come forward? If there is something out there, I think it might be best to get into a offensive position before the last day. Certainly there is considerations of how pertinent the information is etc., but disregarding that: do we as a team collectively think a power role with solid information should step forward at this point? I think with new players (at least in this forum) answering this question might help encourage them to step forward, assuming those power roles are active in the thread.

 

I am generally for it, concerns about the weight of the information aside, I would hate to drop another townie on so little information - especially when our highest voted candidate at this point hasn't posted all day.

 

If I'm the only one feeling this way, so be it. All you eager voters, notice I am asking for consensus, not pushing for a reveal that the town does not find appropriate. In the alternative, if we mis-lynch today, what about tomorrow?

But if sum1 role claims then won't they be targeted by mafia hence making their role useless.

But if someone role claims and their role seems legit, I'm sure the town doctor would protect them.

and I'm with BeeBs, but I don't think anyone knows anything super useful yet or else they probably would have tried to turn the vote off of reign of terror. So:

 

Vote: Reign of terror

 

Oh and I'm using my iPhone to post this, and I don't think you can bold things on the mobile site, so does my vote count? Or is there some way to bold that I'm just not seeing?

Nevermind, I guess I can switch to the full version on my iPhone instead of the mobile version, so:

 

Vote: reign of terror

I would urge the cop (if any) to use discretion in role-claiming.

If all you know is that someone is a townie, there are other ways to let us know that without role-claiming.

For instance if I were killed and shown to be a cop, you could place more weight on my belief that Electric Mango is a townie.

 

However, if I am killed I will not be shown to be a cop.

I had a one-use tracker which I used on EM on the first night. It gave no result so I simply hinted that he's less likely to be townie.

 

I find it amusing that two other players found it appropriate to "probe" him.

 

Regarding lynching. I would not be totally sad if we didn't reach majority.

I'm guessing 3 scum are still alive out of the 13 remaining players. Odds favor a random lynch hitting a townie.

 

The real tragedy will be when somebody investigates and discovers scum but we are not able to get 7 votes to lynch. That's very possible since only 9 players have posted this day. We would need 7 of those 9 to agree to lynch. If the lynching target happens to be scum, there won't be any scum votes on him.

 

If the scum have night-kills, then they will be targetting active townies and our problem only gets worse. The case can be made that we should lynch inactive townies so that a majority will be easier to reach when we finally have better information.

 

A pro-town vigilante that has to kill would be wise to choose an inactive as well.

Theory: 1/2 the town is sane, the other 1/2 is insane. Both have equal powers. That is why we have so many power roles and why we need a full majority to lynch. Neither side knows who else is on their team. I think we should lynch because if what I believe is true, we have better odds than not of lynching a sane person since we are down two and they are only down one.

Theory: 1/2 the town is sane, the other 1/2 is insane. Both have equal powers. That is why we have so many power roles and why we need a full majority to lynch. Neither side knows who else is on their team. I think we should lynch because if what I believe is true, we have better odds than not of lynching a sane person since we are down two and they are only down one.

 

Hm, interesting theory, but how would a faction win?

We just kill each other off until one side is lucky enough to remain.

 

It works and is balanced, although not very strategic. Half the fun is discovering the set-up, anyway.

VOTE COUNT

reign of terror (4): KevinH, ccabal86, Alternate_Tree, Xx Karl xX

ABigDeer (1): Rafay

Rafay (1): cam177

 

Not Voting (10): ABigDeer, Angel Cruz dela Sant, BeeBs, Daimos, d3mon, Electric Mango, reign of terror

 

With 13 Alive, 7 is needed to lynch.

reign of terror is the current wagon leader, at L-3

Deadline is in 3 days.

 

d3mon will immediately replace OrangeRush7

Edited July 2, 201214 yr by Kaziocore

Looks like another interesting setup from Kazio.. I am reading the thread and will try to post something later in the day..

Our home has been without power over the weekend in 100 plus degree weather. Our electric company is projecting it could last 7 days! I am at work posting these.

 

I am casting my vote now just in case I do not get another chance this week.

 

Since I agree we need to lynch someone and most seem to be leaning towards RoT so…

 

Vote: Reign of Terror

Welcome d3mon!

 

I have 10/13 faith that you are on my side if it's a normal setup and 6/13 faith if it's the equal sides setup.

I think since everybody is favouring a lynch vs no lynch I might as well vote roT too. I just don't want any innocent blood on my hands. But I also don't wanna post the lynching vote as it will make ppl think as if I'm a wrong guy like last time.

Reign of Terror is currently at 5 votes with 7 needed for lynch.

There is no half majority at deadline so we need 2 more votes to lynch.

Those of you that are not voting to lynch are effectively calling for a no-lynch since no other candidate will realistically get the votes in 3 days.

I honestly don't mind the no-lynch since we didn't lose any townies to a night-kill last night but you will be counted as either in favor of lynching Reign of Terror or not. There is no alternate candidate being pushed.

I don't yet know if I can bring myself to vote for someone not even active enough to post a single word in their defense, especially when we have launched very few alternative theories. At this point I am unwilling to stake my name on it. Has anyone heard from Reign of Terror? I mean, he's got some government roles doesn't he? He should be active somewhere on the forum...

 

Obvious probabilities are obvious and I agree with the sentiment that a no-lynch is not completely harmful; it likely saves us from a mis-lynch. With so many remaining players I'd like to allow for more days for something from the cop or doc. Maybe we'll get a good kill with a vigilante or even something else from a power role we weren't expecting. Clearly, we're even at a loss for what sorts of power roles we've lost at this point, not to mention their faction!

 

At this point today I am unable to get us so close to a lynch on an easy target candidate without any more immediate need to get a pattern. With everyone who is active voting for Reign of Terror the "voting pattern" is going to be damn near worthless anyway. I think things would be different if the other half of the players were here as well.

 

Interestingly enough KevinH, I see you seeming to play both sides of the fence. Voting to lynch while recognizing the serious likelihood of a townie lynch, even furthermore advocating for a aggressive use of the vigilante. While I'm not entirely sure I disagree with your prod of our vigilante, it seems more aggressive than what I have noticed as a more calculated play style. Just something that raised a flag for me a bit.