1277 replies to this topic

[iSocialism]

 

Then show me how it's "properly" done. Why the vote on me?

 

I've properly answered your questions (which I think quite a few may agree here?)

I've been forthcoming.

I've been active.

I've not disappeared and then claimed 'life', when I know that many here also have a job, schooling, or a life.

 

You, have not.

 

You've been busted.

 

lol, so you voted for me because you have been active. you voted for me because you answered my questions. you voted for me because you planned for the future. You voted for me because you have not disappeared.

 

and as for my work. I had to travel which reading and posting back while driving is kind of hard, so if anyone feels like I'm scum because of an inability to post for a few fucking days, then vote for me now, and as for now, if you don't vote for me. Then lets forget about out-of-game stuff as a reason for voting for someone. No one can choose their RL situation, but only how they play in game, so if the best you can do is reiterate a past statement of RL as a reason to vote for someone. Then LOL

[Rusken]

 

 

Then show me how it's "properly" done. Why the vote on me?

 

I've properly answered your questions (which I think quite a few may agree here?)

I've been forthcoming.

I've been active.

I've not disappeared and then claimed 'life', when I know that many here also have a job, schooling, or a life.

 

You, have not.

 

You've been busted.

 

lol, so you voted for me because you have been active. you voted for me because you answered my questions. you voted for me because you planned for the future. You voted for me because you have not disappeared.

 

and as for my work. I had to travel which reading and posting back while driving is kind of hard, so if anyone feels like I'm scum because of an inability to post for a few fucking days, then vote for me now, and as for now, if you don't vote for me. Then lets forget about out-of-game stuff as a reason for voting for someone. No one can choose their RL situation, but only how they play in game, so if the best you can do is reiterate a past statement of RL as a reason to vote for someone. Then LOL

 

Planned for the future? Huh? Looking at my response to you, I do not see where you gathered that information. I could also add in that I've asked questions. You have not. You immediately assume me with very poor reasoning.

 

Sad that I can't just nix out an inactive because of your poor excuse. I'd rather get rid of one of them, rather than someone that is here, but that's I guess how we have to play this now.

[Robert2424]

The isoc and rusken battle is heating up. *plays MK music*

[iSocialism]

[quote name="Rusken" post="825456" timestamp="1454136634"][quote name="iSocialism" post="825452" timestamp="1454133151"]

 
[quote name="Rusken" post="825448" timestamp="1454131139"]

 
[quote name="iSocialism" post="825443" timestamp="1454126449"]

Then show me how it's "properly" done. Why the vote on me?

[/quote]
 
I've properly answered your questions (which I think quite a few may agree here?)
I've been forthcoming.
I've been active.
I've not disappeared and then claimed 'life', when I know that many here also have a job, schooling, or a life.
 
You, have not.
 
You've been busted.
 

[/quote]
lol, so you voted for me because you have been active. you voted for me because you answered my questions. you voted for me because you planned for the future. You voted for me because you have not disappeared.
 
and as for my work. I had to travel which reading and posting back while driving is kind of hard, so if anyone feels like I'm scum because of an inability to post for a few fucking days, then vote for me now, and as for now, if you don't vote for me. Then lets forget about out-of-game stuff as a reason for voting for someone. No one can choose their RL situation, but only how they play in game, so if the best you can do is reiterate a past statement of RL as a reason to vote for someone. Then LOL
 

[/quote]

Planned for the future? Huh? Looking at my response to you, I do not see where you gathered that information. I could also add in that I've asked questions. You have not. You immediately assume me with very poor reasoning.
 
Sad that I can't just nix out an inactive because of your poor excuse. I'd rather get rid of one of them, rather than someone that is here, but that's I guess how we have to play this now.[/quote

Yep I haven't asked one single question. Such as how I'm sum to you? I guess that isn't a question toyboy, so you don't feel the need to answer it.
I will point this out. There is definitely people watching. But none have piped in. They're being quiet. As almost they are happy with either one of us being lynched.

[Perez]

This discussion between isoc and rusken might change my vote...

[Robert2424]

They have the spotlight as others hide in the shadows.

[Road2Victory]

It all started with one vote 

[Finster Baby]

This is becoming interesting.

[Rusken]

[quote name="iSocialism" post="825452" timestamp="1454133151"]

 
[quote name="Rusken" post="825448" timestamp="1454131139"]

 
[quote name="iSocialism" post="825443" timestamp="1454126449"]

Then show me how it's "properly" done. Why the vote on me?

[/quote]
 
I've properly answered your questions (which I think quite a few may agree here?)
I've been forthcoming.
I've been active.
I've not disappeared and then claimed 'life', when I know that many here also have a job, schooling, or a life.
 
You, have not.
 
You've been busted.
 

[/quote]
lol, so you voted for me because you have been active. you voted for me because you answered my questions. you voted for me because you planned for the future. You voted for me because you have not disappeared.
 
and as for my work. I had to travel which reading and posting back while driving is kind of hard, so if anyone feels like I'm scum because of an inability to post for a few fucking days, then vote for me now, and as for now, if you don't vote for me. Then lets forget about out-of-game stuff as a reason for voting for someone. No one can choose their RL situation, but only how they play in game, so if the best you can do is reiterate a past statement of RL as a reason to vote for someone. Then LOL
 

Planned for the future? Huh? Looking at my response to you, I do not see where you gathered that information. I could also add in that I've asked questions. You have not. You immediately assume me with very poor reasoning.
 
Sad that I can't just nix out an inactive because of your poor excuse. I'd rather get rid of one of them, rather than someone that is here, but that's I guess how we have to play this now.[/quote

Yep I haven't asked one single question. Such as how I'm sum to you? I guess that isn't a question toyboy, so you don't feel the need to answer it.
I will point this out. There is definitely people watching. But none have piped in. They're being quiet. As almost they are happy with either one of us being lynched.

 

Yes. Don't think that hasn't gone unnoticed, because it's definitely not a surprise or shock.

 

Such as how you sum to me? You're right, that is a question. Not very well put together, nor does its response help make determinations.

 

So tell me then, what did you do during the night?

[The Warrior]

Those of us watching this argument are doing so because we are trying to formulate our opinions about the argument. There are several actions here that are suspicious and I would like to see if any other information comes out of it.

[iSocialism]

Those of us watching this argument are doing so because we are trying to formulate our opinions about the argument. There are several actions here that are suspicious and I would like to see if any other information comes out of it.

and what actions or suspicious?

 

and Rusken, you would be assuming that I could do something during the night with your questions.

 

Unvote

[Samus]

where's Lyner?

[The Warrior]

Those of us watching this argument are doing so because we are trying to formulate our opinions about the argument. There are several actions here that are suspicious and I would like to see if any other information comes out of it.

and what actions or suspicious?

and Rusken, you would be assuming that I could do something during the night with your questions.

Unvote

The vague defense of votes and Rusken voting for you because you voted for him.

where's Lyner?

Or Kazio? Or Rafay?

[Rusken]

 

Those of us watching this argument are doing so because we are trying to formulate our opinions about the argument. There are several actions here that are suspicious and I would like to see if any other information comes out of it.

and what actions or suspicious?

 

and Rusken, you would be assuming that I could do something during the night with your questions.

 

Unvote

 

 

I would be doing such, yes, but if one is to cover the basis for determination of scum, then one must ask questions like that, regardless of whether or not they can. It adds to the information pool.

 

Besides, if you get lynched and you are a townie, then I would 100% expect myself to be lynched in response. I still don't think I am, so if you wish to clear your name with me, and potentially the others, now would be a good time to make your defense as to why people shouldn't lynch you based on the information that has been presented.

 

Quite frankly, you've been dodgy.

[Road2Victory]

Those of us watching this argument are doing so because we are trying to formulate our opinions about the argument. There are several actions here that are suspicious and I would like to see if any other information comes out of it.

and what actions or suspicious?

and Rusken, you would be assuming that I could do something during the night with your questions.

Unvote

Say what? Kill or protect townie? Or you hinting at something we don't know?

[iSocialism]

I see no reason to plead a case in which I seek to tell people not to lynch me. It's 3 votes on a very weak basis.

[Rusken]

And your one vote was even weaker with even less reasoning behind it, but yet you were readily willing to defend that...

[iSocialism]

So, why such a hard push to label me scum? to get me lynched?

Because I just voted, one vote, like everyone else, and you guys made a firestorm from it.

[Rusken]

So, why such a hard push to label me scum? to get me lynched?

Because I just voted, one vote, like everyone else, and you guys made a firestorm from it.

Well, I believe R2V requested an answer, and you didn't respond in a manner that he felt would warrant you voting for me.

I voted for you because you voted for me with such a weak ass excuse.

Finster Baby stated the reason they voted for you was because your answer wasn't satisfactory.

 

At least, that's what I've gathered from it thus far.

 

I've never made any excuse why I voted for you, but even you have to be able to look back and see why it is the way it is. I give kudos to those who are actually reading this information and making an informed decision (or are planning scum attacks).

 

Regardless, because you decided to drag me into this by voting for me, it puts a target on me as well. I don't appreciate being a target without viable reason, and no, "Because you voted to lynch a day 1 inactive" doesn't quantify the placement of a target on me.

[KevinH]

Q: What do you call a potato that has turned to the Dark side?
A: Vader Tots.

Vote Count

iSocialism (3): Road2Victory, Rusken, Finster Baby,
Electric Mango (2): Kaziocore, Perez,
Perez (1): Electric Mango,
The Warrior (1): Samus,
Lyner (1): Robert2424, 
Rusken (0): 
Mandarijn (0):
Finster Baby (0):
Imran Ehsan (0):
Yehom (0):
Robert2424 (0):
Samus (0):
Rafay (0):
Kaziocore (0): 
Road2Victory (0):

No Lynch (0):

Not voting: Mandarijn, Imran Ehsan, The Warrior, Yehom, Lyner, Rafay, iSocialism,

 
With 15 alive, it takes 8 to lynch or 4 at deadline.
Deadline is Saturday, February 6, at 18:00 EST.